Visualization analysis of occupational safety research trend based on CiteSpace

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To analyze the current situation in the field of occupational safety by using the scientific knowledge map，intuitively reflect the research hotspot and development trend in the field of occupational safety，and provide reference for the follow-up research in the field of occupational safety. Methods Based on 12 067 occupational safety papers collected in Web of Science database from 2009 to 2019，the visualization analysis was conducted by the literature visualization software CiteSpace V to study the research areas，institutions，word frequency and hot spots in the field of occupational safety. Results The top two countries with the highest volume of articles in the field of occupational safety from 2009 to 2019 were the United States（4 334 articles） and Canada（953 articles）. The top two institutes with the highest volume of articles were the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health of the United States and the University of Toronto of Canada，with 507 and 248 respectively. The journals with the highest source centrality were the American Journal of Medicine and Environmental and Occupational Health. The research hotspots mainly focused on legislation，government supervision and other fields. Conclusion The number of occupational safety literature shows a rapid growth trend，and the research in the fields of occupational safety technology and behavioral safety has also begun to become a hot spot.

Key words: Occupational safety, Mapping of science, Visualization, CiteSpace

CLC Number:

R181.3⁺1

QIAO Wan-guan, LIU Quan-long, CHNE Xue. Visualization analysis of occupational safety research trend based on CiteSpace. [J]OCCUPATION AND HEALTH, 2023, 39(3): 405-409.

References

[1] ADAKU E,ANKRAH N A,NDEKUGRI I E.Design for occupational safety and health:A theoretical framework for organisational capability[J].Saf Sci,2021:133.
[2] SINYAI C,CHOI S.Fifteen years of American construction occupational safety and health research[J].Saf Sci,2021:131.
[3] 赵瑞华.美国劳工部职业安全卫生监察局(OSHA)30年重大事件[J].劳动安全与健康,2001(4):51-52.
[4] 陈悦,陈超美,刘则渊,等.CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J].科学学研究,2015,33(2):242-253.
[5] 汪张毅,赵浩梅,王月,等.基于CiteSpace的我国护理领域情绪调节策略研究的文献计量及可视化分析[J].职业与健康,2021,37(23):3270-3275,3280.
[6] 黄雯,杨松霖.中美安全关系研究20年:回顾与展望——基于CiteSpace的知识图谱分析[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2020(1):97-113.
[7] 谌倩,何琴.我国职业安全规制体制改革的演变及发展趋势[J].齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020(7):67-70.
[8] 金浩,潘长城,陈健,等.中美国防工业安全生产监管体系比较[J].中国安全科学学报,2020,30(10):12-19.
[9] 段志萍,张沁雨,周志俊.芬兰政府在职业卫生工作中的作用[J].职业卫生与应急救援,2022,40(1):119-123.
[10] 竺逸,周志俊.英国职业卫生安全管理模式[J].中国工业医学杂志,2008,27(4):279-281.
[11] 朱素蓉,戴云,卢伟.美国职业安全卫生管理中的非政府组织及其作用[J].环境与职业医学,2015,32(2):159-163.
[12] 卢伟,朱素蓉.非政府组织在职业健康保护中的作用——中美职业安全与卫生专业性非政府组织比较和启示[J].环境与职业医学,2014,31(10):747-752.
[13] THOMAS J W C,HILLEBOE H E.Administrative centralization versus decentralization and the role of generalists and specialists[J].Ame J Pub Hea Nations Health,1968,58(9):1620-1632.
[14] 刘欣.职业安全卫生政府规制与企业自我规制边界研究[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2021.
[15] 刚占慧,汪礼俊,李俊.美国公共安全挑战赛对提升我国应急救援科技创新能力的启示[J].科技管理研究,2022,42(3):23-29.
[16] STOFFREGEN S A,GIORDANO F B,LEE J.Psycho-socio-cultural factors and global occupational safety:Integrating micro- and macro-systems[J].Soc Sci Med,2019,226(c):153-163.
[17] 刘旭东,张志浩,李小明.我国职业卫生与安全工作现状与展望[J].职业与健康,2012,28(3):370-372.
[18] YAGIL D.Beliefs,motives and situational factors related to pedestrians self-reported behavior at signal-controlled crossings[J].Tra Res F-Traf,2000,3(1):1-13.
[19] KUNAR B M,BHATTACHERJEE A,CHAU N.Relationships of job hazards,lack of knowledge,alcohol use,health status and risk taking behavior to work injury of coal miners:A case-control study in India[J].J Occup Health,2020,50(3):236-244.
[20] SUPTITZ C A,ANDOLHE R,DE LIMA DALMOLIN G,et al.Occupational stress,burnout and patient safety culture among workers from critical care and non critical care units in a hospital in Brazil[J].Intensive Crit Care Nurs,2021:63.
[21] 陈夏明.工人安全行为与职业伤害关系的相关性[J].中国热带医学,2013,13(4):456-459.