Health risk assessment of 17 chemical substances in drinking water in Huai'an City in 2022

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To understand the content of 17 chemical substances such as arsenic and cadmium in the drinking water in Huai'an City in 2022,and evaluate their potential risks to human health through drinking water routes. Methods Totally 825 drinking water samples were collected from various counties and districts in Huai'an City in 2022. The health risk assessment model recommended by the US Environmental Protection Agency was used to evaluate the health risks of 17 chemical substances. T-test was used to compare the health risks differences of 17 chemical substances in different types of drinking water. Results The qualified rates of 17 chemicals in drinking water in Huai'an City were 100%,in which mercury and volatile phenols were not detected. The carcinogenic risks of cadmium,hexavalent chromium,arsenic,trichloromethane and carbon tetrachloride in drinking water were 9.14×10^-7/a,8.74×10^-7/a,7.40×10^-7/a,2.66×10^-7/a,2.87×10^-9/a,respectively,and the cumulative carcinogenic risk value was 2.80×10^-6/a,which was within an acceptable range. The non-carcinogenic risks of chemicals substances in drinking water,from high to low,were fluoride,nitrate nitrogen,lead,mercury,copper,selenium,ammonia nitrogen,iron,zinc,cyanide,manganese,and volatile phenols,which were 4.89×10^-9/a,4.75×10^-10/a,4.27×10^-10/a,7.87×10^-11/a,4.30×10^-11/a,2.48×10^-11/a,2.15×10^-11/a, 2.00×10^-11/a,1.67×10^-11/a,1.43×10^-11/a,1.30×10^-11/a,1.57×10^-12/a,respectively,and the cumulative non-carcinogenic risk value was 6.03×10^-9/a,which was a negligible level. The carcinogenic risk of 5 chemicals（including cadmium,hexavalent chromium,arsenic,trichloromethane,and carbon tetrachloride） and the non-carcinogenic risk of 5 chemicals（including selenium,fluoride,iron,manganese and copper） were higher in wet season than in dry season（all P<0.05）. The carcinogenic risk of arsenic and trichloromethane and the non-carcinogenic risk of selenium and zinc in finished water,were lower than that of tap water（all P<0.05）. Conclusion The carcinogenic risk caused by the exposure of 5 chemical substances in drinking water through the water route in Huai'an City in 2022 was in acceptable range,which needs high attention. Among them,cadmium and hexavalent chromium were the main chemical substances of health risk in drinking water in Huai'an,and the non-carcinogenic risk caused by the exposure of 12 chemical substances was at a negligible level.

Key words: Drinking water, Chemical substances, Health risk assessment

CLC Number:

R181.3⁺4

YANG Juan, WANG Qi, CHEN Xiaomin, CHEN Guocai, LUO Shancai, ZHANG Wen. Health risk assessment of 17 chemical substances in drinking water in Huai'an City in 2022. [J]OCCUPATION AND HEALTH, 2025, 41(17): 2378-2381.

References

[1] 陈绍伟,杨炜毓,黄梓培,等.2017—2019年汕头市生活饮用水水质影响因素分析[J].环境卫生学杂志,2023,13(2):134-138,148.
[2] 何鑫,张玉娇,赖承钺.成都市饮用水源地重金属健康风险初步评估[J].水资源开发与管理,2023,9(6):7-12.
[3] 邓春拓,何伦发,郭艳,等.2015年中山市饮用水源水中化学污染物健康风险评价[J].环境与健康杂志,2018,35(8):722-725.
[4] 中华人民共和国卫生部,中国国家标准化管理委员会.生活饮用水卫生标准检验方法:GB/T 5750—2006[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007:1.
[5] 中华人民共和国卫生部,中国国家标准化管理委员会.生活饮用水卫生标准:GB 5749—2006[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007:1-6.
[6] 邓春拓,何伦发,郭艳,等.珠三角某市2015年出厂水中化学污染物健康风险评价[J].实用预防医学,2017,24(4):425-428.
[7] 江穗宁,邬军军,廖灵灵,等.2019—2022年惠州市集中式生活饮用水中化学污染物状况及健康风险评估[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2023, 33(6):737-741,747.
[8] 陈栋. 2014—2016年六安市生活饮用水水质影响因素分析及健康风险评价[D].合肥:安徽医科大学,2018.
[9] 环境保护部.中国人群暴露参数手册(成人卷)[M].北京:中国环境出版社,2013:142-801.
[10] 江苏省统计局.2020年江苏人口平均预期寿命为79.32[EB/OL].(2022-02-09)[2024-01-04].http://tj.jiangsu.gov.cn/art/2022/2/9/art_85276_10479373.html.
[11] US EPA.Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment[S/OL].(2005-03-25)[2024-01-04].https://www.epa.gov/risk/guidelines-carcinogen-risk-assessment.
[12] Office of Water US EPA.2012 edition of the drinking water standards and health advisories[S/OL].(2012-04)[2024-01-04].https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P100N01H.txt
[13] 梅雯,秦勤,李明俊,等.2021年镇江市区饮用水状况分析[J].镇江高专学报,2023,36(4):84-87.
[14] 王慧,范尉尉,武瑞婷,等.2014—2021年石家庄生活饮用水中化学物健康风险评估[J].环境与职业医学,2023,40(8):942-949.
[15] 韩嘉艺,叶必雄,张岚.某市饮用水中10种污染物的健康风险评价[J].环境卫生学杂志,2019,9(3):203-209.
[16] GENCHI G,SINICROPI M S,LAURIA G,et al.The effects of cadmium toxicity[J].Int J Environ Res Public Health,2020,17(11):3782.
[17] SMITH A H,STEINMAUS C M.Health effects of arsenic and chromium in drinking water:Recent human findings[J].Annu Rev Public Health, 2009,30:107-122.
[18] 唐真. 我国重点流域饮用水中硒、铬、汞形态分布及健康风险评价[D].北京:中国疾病预防控制中心,2021.
[19] 许东海,赵斌,陆建伟,等.2022年广元市饮用水中23种化学物质的健康风险评估[J].预防医学情报杂志,2024,40(7):829-839.
[20] 温豪,何林,古子豪,等.2017—2020年深圳市龙华区生活饮用水常见致癌物质监测及健康风险评价[J].预防医学论坛,2022,28(4):311-314.
[21] 卜倍. 生活饮用水卫生标准的提升对水处理工艺的影响——以饮用水除镉为例[J].安徽农学通报,2016,22(Z1):70-72.
[22] 廖雅芬,叶坚,古翠虹.肇庆市农村地区饮用水健康风险评价[J].现代预防医学,2018,45(6):1133-1136.
[23] 王祚懿,陈强,何晓庆,等.金华市农村生活饮用水化学污染健康风险评估[J].预防医学,2019,31(10):1012-1016.
[24] 徐征东,姚志扬,李金坤,等.2019—2021年连云港市城区饮用水17种化学污染物健康风险评估[J].江苏预防医学,2023,34(5):630-633.
[25] 贾茹,郑晶利,孙茜,等.陕西省生活饮用水中10种污染物的健康风险评价[J].职业与健康,2022,38(22):3092-3096.
[26] 黄素丽,蓝涛,刘鑫,等.2019年深圳市生活饮用水健康风险评估[J].环境卫生学杂志,2021,11(6):519-524.
[27] 余林玲,肖长春.2017—2021年合肥市生活饮用水健康风险评估[J].现代预防医学,2023,50(17):3246-3251.
[28] 岳宣志,李欢,高昇,等.2021年内蒙古自治区农村饮用水砷、镉、铬、铅和汞健康风险评估[J].环境卫生学杂志,2023,13(10):765-769,777.
[29] 罗赟. 2015—2019年绵阳市生活饮用水重金属污染物指标健康风险评价[J].职业与健康,2022,38(7):927-931.
[30] 司晓雪,谭亮,傅伟,等.2020—2022年长沙市城市饮用水中三氯甲烷和四氯化碳含量监测及健康风险评估[J].预防医学情报杂志,2024, 40(7):824-828.