职业与健康 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (22): 3085-3091.

• 论著—流行病学与预防保健 • 上一篇    下一篇

新疆疾控系统实验室人员检验检测知信行及影响因素调查

马依拉·莫合旦尔1, 郭荣2, 艾力非热·吾买尔1, 王翔1, 刘万里2()   

  1. 1 新疆医科大学新疆 乌鲁木齐 830011
    2 新疆维吾尔自治区疾病预防控制中心(新疆维吾尔自治区预防医学科学院)新疆 乌鲁木齐 830002
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-04 修回日期:2026-01-06 出版日期:2026-11-15 发布日期:2026-09-20
  • 通信作者: 刘万里,E-mail:xjcdclwl@163.com
  • 作者简介:马依拉·莫合旦尔,女,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为流行病与卫生统计学。
  • 基金资助:
    公共卫生人才培养支持项目

Investigation on knowledge-attitude-practice and influencing factors of inspection and testing among laboratory personnel in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Xinjiang

Mayila Mohedaner1, GUO Rong2, Ailifeire Wumaier1, WANG Xiang1, LIU Wanli2()   

  1. 1 Xinjiang Medical UniversityUrumqiXinjiang 830011, China
    2 Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Center for Disease Control and Prevention(Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Academy of Preventive Medicine)UrumqiXinjiang 830002, China
  • Received:2025-09-04 Revised:2026-01-06 Online:2026-11-15 Published:2026-09-20
  • Contact: LIU Wanli,E-mail:xjcdclwl@163.com

摘要:

目的 了解新疆疾病预防控制(疾控)系统实验室人员检验检测方面的知识、信念和行为(knowledge-attitude-practice,KAP)现况,并探究其影响因素。方法 采用方便整群抽样的方法,于2024年10月和2025年4月对来自新疆维吾尔自治区地(市)级和县级疾病预防控制(疾控)中心273名实验室人员进行检验检测知信行问卷调查,用秩和检验、Spearman秩相关系数法和多元线性回归法对数据进行分析。结果 新疆疾控系统实验室人员知信行量表各维度和总维度信效度均良好;知识、信念和行为维度得分MP25P75)分别为78.18(65.45,84.55)、83.08(75.39,87.69)和80.00(72.94,87.65)分;知识与信念、知识与行为、信念与行为得分之间均呈正相关(r=0.438、0.477、0.533,均P<0.01)。多元线性回归分析发现,在知识维度,年龄、工作内容和学习方式均是其影响因素(均P<0.05);在信念维度方面,单位级别是影响因素(P<0.05);在行为维度方面,是否仍进实验室是其影响因素(P<0.05);在KAP维度方面,单位级别差异和是否仍进实验室均是其影响因素(均P<0.05)。结论 新疆疾控系统实验室人员检验检测信念和行为水平较高,但知识水平较低。实验室人员知信行主要影响因素分别为年龄、工作内容、学习方式、单位级别、是否进实验室等,这为实验室人员管理、培训和教育提供了有价值的参考依据。

关键词: 疾病预防, 实验室人员, 检验检测, 知识, 信念, 行为

Abstract:

Objective To understand the current status of knowledge,attitude,and practice(KAP) of laboratory personnel in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDCs) in Xinjiang and explore the influencing factors. Methods A convenient cluster sampling method was used to conduct a KAP questionnaire survey among 273 laboratory personnel from prefectural and county-level CDCs in Xinjiang in October 2024 and April 2025. The data were analyzed using rank sum test,Spearman rank correlation coefficient method,and generalized linear regression method. Results The reliability and validity of each dimension and the total dimension of the KAP scale among laboratory personnel in CDCs in Xinjiang were good.The MP25P75) scores of the knowledge,attitude,and practice dimensions were 78.18(65.45,84.55),83.08(75.39,87.69),and 80.00(72.94,87.65)points,respectively. There were positive correlations between knowledge and attitude,knowledge and practice,and attitude and practice scores(r=0.438,0.477,0.533,all P<0.01). Multivariate linear regression analysis found that there were statistically significant differences in the knowledge dimension regarding age,job content,and learning methods(all P<0.05);In the attitude dimension,unit level was the influencing factor(P<0.05);In the behavior dimension,whether the staff continued to enter the laboratory was the influencing factor(P<0.05);And in the KAP dimension,unit level and whether the staff continued to enter the laboratory were the influencing factors(both P<0.05). Conclusion The attitude and practice levels of laboratory personnel in the CDCs in Xinjiang are relatively high,but the knowledge level is relatively low.The main influencing factors of KAP of laboratory personnel are age,job content,learning methods,unit level,and whether the staff continued to enter the laboratory,which provide valuable reference for the management,training,and education of laboratory personnel.

Key words: Disease prevention and control, Laboratory personnel, Inspection and testing, Knowledge, Attitude, Practice

中图分类号: