认知重评与心理韧性在幸福素养赋能军校学员主观幸福感过程的中介作用

职业与健康 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 89-94.

认知重评与心理韧性在幸福素养赋能军校学员主观幸福感过程的中介作用

贾臻^1,2, 吕恬歌^1,3, 杨国愉¹

1.陆军军医大学医学心理系军人发展心理学教研室,重庆 400038;
2.空军勤务学院专工训练大队,江苏徐州 221000;
3.北部战区总医院干部病房一科,辽宁沈阳 110000

收稿日期:2023-09-06 修回日期:2023-09-19 出版日期:2024-01-01 发布日期:2026-03-11
通信作者: 杨国愉,教授,E-mail：gyyang0122@foxmail.com
作者简介:贾臻,男,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为军人心理健康教育和心理训练。
基金资助:
全军军事理论重点项目（JJ201910-B003）

Mediating role of cognitive reappraisal and mental toughness in the process of happiness literacy empowering military cadets' subjective well-being

JIA Zhen^1,2, LYU Tiange^1,3, YANG Guoyu¹

1. Section of Developmental Psychology for Army Man, Department of Medical Psychology, Army Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, China;
2. Professional Training Group, Air Force Military Service College, Xuzhou Jiangsu, 221000, China;
3. First Department of Cadre Ward, Northern Theater Command Ceneral Hospital, Shenyang Liaoning, 110000, China

Received:2023-09-06 Revised:2023-09-19 Online:2024-01-01 Published:2026-03-11
Contact: YANG Guoyu,Professor,E-mail：gyyang0122@foxmail.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的了解军校学员的幸福素养对其主观幸福感的影响及作用机制。方法 2022年11月—2023年2月,采取整群抽样法抽取军校学员3 218名,采用中文版幸福素养6项量表、中文版总体幸福感量表、情绪调节策略量表、简版心理韧性量表对其进行调查,并对数据进行分析。结果 3 218名军校学员幸福素养、认知重评、心理韧性、主观幸福感平均分依次为（34.22±9.76）、（32.07±7.68）、（30.15±8.25）和（84.82±15.36）分,且两两均呈正相关（均P<0.01）。幸福素养对主观幸福感的直接效应值为0.130（P<0.05）,幸福素养可以正向预测认知重评（路径系数为0.26,P<0.05）和心理韧性（路径系数为0.11,P<0.05）,认知重评和心理韧性对军校学员幸福素养与主观幸福感间的中介效应显著,中介总效应值为0.307。主要存在3条中介效应链：（1）幸福素养→认知重评→主观幸福感,效应值为0.018;（2）幸福素养→心理韧性→主观幸福感,效应值为0.065;（3）幸福素养→认知重评→心理韧性→主观幸福感,效应值为0.094。3条中介效应链占总中介效应的百分比分别为5.9%、21.1%和30.5%。结论幸福素养这一语言能力能够通过认知重评与心理韧性的链式中介作用提升军校学员主观幸福感的赋能。

关键词: 军校学员, 幸福素养, 认知重评, 心理韧性, 主观幸福感, 中介作用

Abstract: Objective To investigate the influence and mechanism of well-being literacy of military cadets on their subjective well-being. Methods From November 2022 to February 2023,3 218 military cadets were selected by the whole-group sampling method,a well-being literacy 6 item scale（Well-Lit 6）,general well-being schedule（GWBS）,emotion regulationquestionnaire（ERQ） and connor-savidsonresiliencescale（CD-RISC-10） were used to survey them,and the data was analyzed. Results The mean scores of well-being,cognitive reappraisal,resilience and subjective well-being of 3 218 military cadets were （34.22±9.76）,（32.07±7.68）,（30.15±8.25） and （84.82±15.36）points,and both were positively correlated（all P<0.01）. The direct effect value of well-being literacy on subjective well-being was 0.130（P<0.05）,well-being literacy positively predicted cognitive reappraisal（path coefficient of 0.26, P<0.05） and resilience（path coefficient of 0.11,P<0.05）,and the mediating effect of cognitive reappraisal and resilience on the relationship between well-being literacy and subjective well-being of military cadets was significant,with a total mediating effect value of 0.307.There were three main mediating effect chains：（1）well-being→cognitive reappraisal→subjective well-being,with an effect value of 0.018;（2）well-being→resilience→subjective well-being,with an effect value of 0.065;（3）well-being→cognitive reappraisal→resilience→subjective well-being,with an effect value of 0.094.The percentages of the three mediating effect chains in the total mediating effect were 5.9%,21.1%,and 30.5%. Conclusion Well-being literacy as a linguistic competence can empower military cadets to enhance their subjective well-being through the chain of cognitive reappraisal and resilience mediation.

Key words: Military cadets, Well-being literacy, Cognitive reappraisal, Resilience, Subjective well-being, Mediation effect

中图分类号:

R395.6

贾臻, 吕恬歌, 杨国愉. 认知重评与心理韧性在幸福素养赋能军校学员主观幸福感过程的中介作用. [J]职业与健康, 2024, 40(1): 89-94.

JIA Zhen, LYU Tiange, YANG Guoyu. Mediating role of cognitive reappraisal and mental toughness in the process of happiness literacy empowering military cadets' subjective well-being. [J]OCCUPATION AND HEALTH, 2024, 40(1): 89-94.

参考文献

[1] 黄燕琳,王玉萍,陶然,等.军校学员情绪智力与主观幸福感的关系:自我效能感的中介作用和威权领导的调节作用[J].中华灾害救援医学,2021,9(2):802-806.
[2] 吴勇,骆陈.思想政治工作视域下军校大学生幸福感的组成与特点研究[J].高教学刊,2022,8(6):193-196.
[3] 张懿. 大学生主观幸福感实证研究[M].北京:人民日报出版社,2019:13-15.
[4] DIENER E.Subjective well-being.The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index[J].Am Psychol,2000,55(1):34-43.
[5] OADES L G,OZTURK C,HOU H,et al.Wellbeing literacy:A language-use capability relevant to wellbeing outcomes of positive psychology intervention[J].J Posit Psychol,2020,15(5):696-700.
[6] OADES L G,JARDEN A,HOU H,et al.Wellbeing literacy:A capability model for wellbeing science and practice[J].Int J Environ Res Public Health,2021,18(2):719.
[7] C S.The development of emotional competence[M].New York:Guilford Press,1999:304-347.
[8] 刘宏艳,胡治国,彭聃龄.情绪与语言加工的相互作用[J].心理科学进展,2009,17(4):714-721.
[9] 文雅,连波,郑德伟,等.书写表达对大学新生社会支持、心理韧性与学校适应不良的改善作用[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2018, 27(2):183-188.
[10] 武瑾,徐珍珍,张亚迪,等.积极心理学视野下表达性艺术治疗对慢阻肺患者自我效能及心理韧性的影响[J].江苏预防医学,2020, 31(5):594-597.
[11] 张伟,杨茜,王燕芳.语言沟通及心理护理在精神病护理中的作用[J].心理月刊,2021,16(20):207-209.
[12] 周浩,周倩羽.体育锻炼赋能大学生主观幸福感提升:认知重评与心理韧性的链式中介作用[J].山东体育学院学报,2022,38(1):105-111.
[13] HOU H,CHIN T,SLEMP G R,et al.Wellbeing literacy:Conceptualization,measurement,and preliminary empirical findings from students,parents and school staff[J].Int J Environ Health,2021,18(4):1485.
[14] 巫婷辉. 幸福素养对幸福感的提升效果:作用机制及干预应用[D].深圳:深圳大学心理学院,2023.
[15] AWATA S,BECH P,YOSHIDA S,et al.Reliability and validity of the japanese version of the world health organization-five well-being index in the context of detecting depression in diabetic patients[J].Psychiatry Clin Neurosci,2007,61(1):112-119.
[16] DE WIT M,POUWER F,GEMKE R J,et al.Validation of the WHO-5 well-being index in adolescents with type 1 diabetes[J].Diabetes Care, 2007,30(8):2003-2006.
[17] 刘华峰,王晓一,高志华.情绪调节策略在大学生情绪体验与健康状况间的调节作用[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2019,28(2):166-171.
[18] CAMPBELL-SILLS L,STEIN M B.Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor-davidson Resilience Scale(CD-RISC):Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience[J].J Trauma Stress,2007,20(6):1019-1028.
[19] 张丹梅,熊梅,李彦章.心理弹性量表简版在社区老年人中的信效度检验[J].中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,2018,27(10):942-946.
[20] 崔向军,逯春洁,郭永芳,等.大学生情绪调节与抑郁的相关研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2012,20(3):431-433.
[21] 张媛媛,郭卓,黄凯.运动群体大学生情绪调节与父母教养方式的相关研究[J].运动,2014(8):37-38.
[22] AR K,T S,AY M.Cognitive emotion regulation in children is attributable to parenting style,not to family type and child's gender[J].Waset Org,2014,39(2):112-119.
[23] HERZOG T K,HILL-CHAPMAN C,HARDY T K.Trait Emotion,emotional regulation,and parenting styles[J].J Educa Develop Psychol, 2015,5(2):119-135.
[24] SANCHEZ-RUIZ M J,BAAKLINI A.Individual and social correlates of aggressive behavior in Lebanese undergraduates:The role of trait emotional intelligence[J].J Soc Psychol,2018,158(3):350-360.
[25] 陈林,韩立.军校学员心理韧性研究述评与展望[J].校园心理,2013,11(6):386-387.
[26] 王孝龙. 父母教养方式对大学生心理焦虑的影响:心理韧性的中介作用[J].喀什大学学报,2022,43(2):96-100.
[27] 刘庆,王苗苗,相青,等.青少年心理韧性与父母教养方式的关系[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2016,24(7):1039-1042.
[28] 袁付成,卢俊义,葛操.军校大学生主观幸福感的调查研究[J].高等函授学报(自然科学版),2012,25(4):52-54.
[29] 李源源.独生与非独生个体的幸福感差异分析——基于CGSS(2015和2017)数据的实证分析[J].调研世界,2021(6):12-19.
[30] 王顺梅. 青少年家庭教育与主观幸福感关系研究——以兰州市青少年为例[J].兰州职业技术学院学报,2022,38(3):63-64.
[31] 刘启刚,周立秋,乔明明.情绪调节的影响因素研究述评[J].心理技术与应用,2015(2):3-9.
[32] 王心怡,高洁,王乾宇.军校学员人生目的、心理韧性与主观幸福感的关系[J].武警后勤学院学报(医学版),2019,28(2):56-59.