2018—2020年河北省农村学校饮用水卫生现状及风险评估分析

职业与健康 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 509-512.

2018—2020年河北省农村学校饮用水卫生现状及风险评估分析

丁婷婷, 王苏玮, 王美琳, 安玉琴, 袁树华, 刘毅刚

河北省疾病预防控制中心环境卫生监测与评价所,河北石家庄 050020

收稿日期:2023-06-13 修回日期:2023-07-17 出版日期:2024-02-15 发布日期:2026-03-12
通信作者: 刘毅刚,主任技师,E-mail：liuyigang797@163.com
作者简介:丁婷婷,女,主管医师,主要从事饮用水水质卫生监测工作。

Analysis on current situation and risk assessment of drinking water hygiene in rural schools in Hebei Province from 2018 to 2020

DING Tingting, WANG Suwei, WANG Meilin, AN Yuqin, YUAN Shuhua, LIU Yigang

Institute of Environmental Health Monitoring and Evaluation, Hebei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shijiazhuang Hebei, 050020, China

Received:2023-06-13 Revised:2023-07-17 Online:2024-02-15 Published:2026-03-12
Contact: LIU Yigang,Chief technician,E-mail：liuyigang797@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的了解2018—2020年河北省农村学校饮用水卫生状况,并对饮用水中氟化物及硝酸盐氮的健康风险进行评估。方法 2018—2020年分别抽取360、365、355所学校采集末梢水,对水质常规指标及氨氮进行分析评价。采用美国环保局推荐的健康风险评估模型,对河北省农村学校饮用水中氟化物及硝酸盐氮的慢性非致癌风险进行评价。结果河北省农村监测学校以公办中小学占比较高,住宿学生占比超过50%;2018—2020年河北省农村学校饮用水水质达标率由高到低为2020年（82.03%）>2019年（74.11%）>2018年（69.83%）,差异有统计学意义（χ²=29.041,P<0.01）。总大肠菌群、菌落总数和氟化物是影响河北省农村学校饮用水水质总体达标率的主要指标;2020年氟化物指标达标率为96.25%;河北省农村学生经饮用水途径暴露氟化物及硝酸盐氮12年的非致癌风险[M（P₁₀,P₉₀）]分别为0.40（0.12,1.17）、0.08（0.01,0.51）,其中男生、女生分别为0.40（0.12,1.19）、0.39（0.12,1.16）、0.08（0.01,0.52）、0.08（0.01,0.50）。结论 2018—2020年河北省农村学校水质达标率逐年升高,但应加强微生物学指标、氟化物的监测,学校供水方式、消毒及消毒设备的使用状况有待改善。河北省农村学校部分高氟地区学生有一定健康风险,应继续开展改水降氟工作,保障学生饮水安全。

关键词: 农村, 学校, 饮用水, 健康风险评估

Abstract: Objective To understand the drinking water sanitation status of rural schools in Hebei Province from 2018 to 2020,and assess the health risks of fluoride and nitrate nitrogen in drinking water. Methods From 2018 to 2020,360,365,and 355 schools were selected to collect peripheral water,to analyze and evaluate the conventional water quality indicators and ammonia nitrogen. The health risk assessment model recommended by the US Environmental Protection Agency was used to evaluate the chronic non carcinogenic risks of fluoride and nitrate nitrogen in drinking water in rural schools in Hebei Province. Results Public primary and secondary schools accounted for a relatively high proportion of rural monitoring schools in Hebei Province,and accommodation students accounted for more than 50%. From 2018 to 2020,the standard rate of drinking water quality in rural schools in Hebei Province from high to low was 2020 year（82.03%）>2019 year（74.11%）>2018 year（69.83%）,and the difference was statistically significant（χ²=29.041,P<0.01）. The total coliform,bacterial count and fluoride were the main indicators that affected the overall compliance rate of drinking water quality in rural schools in Hebei Province. In 2020,the compliance rate of fluoride indicators was 96.25%,and the non carcinogenic risks of rural students in Hebei Province exposed to fluoride and nitrate nitrogen[M（P₁₀,P₉₀）] through drinking water for 12 years were 0.40（0.12,1.17） and 0.08（0.01,0.51）,respectively,with male and female students at 0.40（0.12,1.19）,0.39（0.12,1.16）,0.08（0.01,0.52）,and 0.08（0.01,0.50）. Conclusions The water quality compliance rate of rural schools in Hebei Province has been increasing year by year from 2018 to 2020. However,it is necessary to strengthen the monitoring of microbiological indicators and fluoride,and improve the use of water supply methods,disinfection,and disinfection equipment in schools. Some students in high fluoride areas of rural schools in Hebei Province have certain health risks and should continue to carry out water improvement and fluoride reduction work to ensure the safety of drinking water for students.

Key words: Rural areas, School, Drinking water, Health risk assessment

中图分类号:

R123.1

丁婷婷, 王苏玮, 王美琳, 安玉琴, 袁树华, 刘毅刚. 2018—2020年河北省农村学校饮用水卫生现状及风险评估分析. [J]职业与健康, 2024, 40(4): 509-512.

DING Tingting, WANG Suwei, WANG Meilin, AN Yuqin, YUAN Shuhua, LIU Yigang. Analysis on current situation and risk assessment of drinking water hygiene in rural schools in Hebei Province from 2018 to 2020. [J]OCCUPATION AND HEALTH, 2024, 40(4): 509-512.

参考文献

[1] 陈刚,简子海,蒋励.贵州农村学校2017—2019年饮水安全工程卫生监测结果[J].中国学校卫生,2020,41(10):1587-1589.
[2] 张雪英,龚华.2016—2020年上海市某区中小学校饮用水微生物污染状况分析[J].应用预防医学,2021,27(6):559-561.
[3] 王肖红,李龙建,王丽,等.一起学校净化饮水机出水铅超标事件调查[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2022,32(9):1135-1137.
[4] 中华人民共和国卫生部,中国国家标准化管理委员会.生活饮用水标准检测方法水样的采集与保存:GB/T 5750.2—2006[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007:1-6.
[5] 中华人民共和国卫生部,中国国家标准化管理委员会.生活饮用水标准检测方法金属指标:GB/T 5750.6—2006[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007:17-60.
[6] 中华人民共和国卫生部,中国国家标准化管理委员会.生活饮用水标准检测方法有机物指标:GB/T 5750.8—2006[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007:1-8.
[7] 中华人民共和国卫生部,中国国家标准化管理委员会.生活饮用水卫生标准:GB 5749—2006[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2007:2-6.
[8] US EPA.Risk assessment guidance for superfund volume I-human health evaluation manual(Part A)[R].Washington,DC:US EPA,Office of Emergency and Remedial Response,1989.
[9] 孙庆华,杜宗豪,杜艳君,等.环境健康风险评估方法第五讲风险特征(续四)[J].环境与健康杂志,2015,32(7):640-642.
[10] 郭吉华. 宁夏中宁县农村饮水安全建管体系分析与探索[J].中国水利,2021(5):56-58.
[11] 詹萍,朱琳.2016—2019年遵义市农村学校水质监测结果分析[J].应用预防医学,2021,27(2):155-156.
[12] 陈喆霄,武永平,张宝芳,等.2018—2020年宝鸡市农村生活饮用水监测结果分析[J].职业与健康,2022,38(5):659-662.
[13] 雷佩玉,郑晶利,贾茹,等.2019年陕西省农村饮水安全工程水质卫生状况[J].职业与健康,2021,37(3):388-392.
[14] 闫瑞霞,周媛,李彦国,等.河北沧州饮水中碘氟含量差异地区儿童甲状腺结节的检出情况[J].环境与职业医学,2019,36(5):470-473,478.
[15] 赫娜,吴蕊丽,王玉春,等.2016 年河北省衡水市辖区饮水型地方性氟中毒病情现状调查分析[J].医学动物防制,2019,35(4):391-393.
[16] 刘波,袁树华,路丽,等.2010至2014年河北省农村集中式供水水质监测结果分析[J].河北医药,2016,38(5):768-771.
[17] 潘璐,王炳玲,王寅,等.2014—2019年青岛市生活饮用水健康风险评估[J].山东大学学报(医学版),2021,59(12):42-49,57.
[18] 李杰,夏荣香,蒲丹,等.2016—2018年新疆农村饮用水水质监测结果分析[J].职业与健康,2020,36(21):2974-2977.
[19] 王丽,郭海昊,苗淑明,等.阜阳市某区农村饮用水氟化物的分布特征及健康风险评估[J].环境卫生学杂志,2021,11(2):194-200.