网络社会支持量表在中老年人中的信效度检验

职业与健康 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 1167-1172.

网络社会支持量表在中老年人中的信效度检验

王雷萍^1,2, 赵怡霖^1,2, 张镇^1,2

1.中国科学院心理研究所,北京 100101;
2.中国科学院大学心理学系,北京 100049

收稿日期:2023-08-29 修回日期:2023-09-14 发布日期:2026-03-13
通信作者: 张镇,副研究员,博士生导师,E-mail：zhangz@psych.ac.cn
作者简介:王雷萍,女,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为网络社会支持。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（71774157）

Reliability and validity of online social support scale in middle-aged and older adults

WANG Leiping^1,2, ZHAO Yilin^1,2, ZHANG Zhen^1,2

1. Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China;
2. Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

Received:2023-08-29 Revised:2023-09-14 Published:2026-03-13
Contact: ZHANG Zhen,Associate research fellow,Doctoral supervisor,E-mail：zhangz@psych.ac.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的检验网络社会支持量表在中老年人中的信效度和适用性。方法 2022年3—5月采用网络社会支持量表、社交媒体使用量表和心理幸福感量表,通过问卷星平台对896位中老年人开展问卷调查,并对数据进行分析。结果该量表具有良好的区分度;探索性因子分析获得的四因子模型可解释总变异的68.28%,验证性因子分析则显示,修订后量表的四因子模型拟合度良好,卡方/自由度（χ²/df）=2.81,比较拟合指数（comparative fit index,CFI）=0.94,相对拟合指数（Tucker-Lewis index,TLI）=0.93,标准化残差均方根（standardized root mean square residual,SRMR）=0.06,近似误差均方根（root-mean-square error of approximation,RMSEA）=0.06;效标关联效度较好,相关系数r=0.65,P<0.01。修订后量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.92,对91人间隔两周的重测信度为0.83。该量表具有跨性别及跨年龄的等值性。对修订后量表的应用还显示,中老年人网络社会支持在性别、年龄和健康状况等人口学变量上的差异有统计学意义,且与心理幸福感各指标显著相关。结论网络社会支持量表在中老年群体中具有良好的信效度和较好的适用性。

关键词: 网络社会支持量表, 效度, 信度, 中老年人, 心理幸福感

Abstract: Objective To test the reliability and validity,applicability of online social support scale in middle-aged and older adults. Methods Totally 896 middle-aged and older adults were tested by online social support scale,social media use scale and 24 items psychological well-being scale through the questionnaire star from March to May 2022,and the data were analyzed. Results The scale was proved to have good discrimination. The four-factor model obtained by exploratory factor analysis could explain 68.28% of the total variation,while the confirmatory factor analysis showed that the four-factor model of the revised scale had a good fit[Chi-square/degrees of freedom（χ²/df）=2.81,comparative fit index（CFI）=0.94,Tucker-Lewis index（TLI）=0.93,standardized root mean square residual（SRMR）=0.06,root-mean-square error of approximation（RMSEA）=0.06]. The criterion correlation validity was good,r=0.65,P<0.01. The Cronbach's α coefficient of this scale was 0.92,and the retest reliability after two weeks among 91 people was 0.83. The scale was equivalent across gender and age. The application of the revised scale also showed that there were statistically significant differences in online social support among middle-aged and older adults with demographic variables such as gender,age and health status,and it was significantly correlated with the indicators of psychological well-being. Conclusion The online social support scale has good reliability,validity and applicability in middle-aged and older adults.

Key words: Online social support scale, Reliability, Validity, Middle-aged and older adults, Psychological well-being

中图分类号:

R181.2

王雷萍, 赵怡霖, 张镇. 网络社会支持量表在中老年人中的信效度检验. [J]职业与健康, 2024, 40(9): 1167-1172.

WANG Leiping, ZHAO Yilin, ZHANG Zhen. Reliability and validity of online social support scale in middle-aged and older adults. [J]OCCUPATION AND HEALTH, 2024, 40(9): 1167-1172.

参考文献

[1] TURNER J W,GRUBE J A,MEYERS J.Developing an optimal match within online communities:An exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support[J].J Commun,2001,51(2):231-251.
[2] ELIZABETH A,NICK D A,COLE S C,et al.The online social support scale:Measure development and validation[J].Psychol Assess,2018, 30(9):1127-1143.
[3] 陶玲霞,程素萍.大学生网络社会支持与主观幸福感的关系:自尊的中介作用[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2018,26(1):109-114.
[4] 王伟,王兴超,雷雳,等.移动社交媒介使用行为对青少年友谊质量的影响:网络自我表露和网络社会支持的中介作用[J].心理科学,2017, 40(4):870-877.
[5] 刘沛汝,姜永志,白晓丽.手机互联网依赖与心理和谐的关系:网络社会支持的作用[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2014,22(2):277-280.
[6] 罗媛慧,张静平.中国离退休老人心理健康[J].中国老年学杂志,2017,8(37):2075-2077.
[7] 聂淼,汪全海,姚应水.我国留守和空巢老人心理问题研究进展[J].中国老年学杂志,2011,12(31):2364-2366.
[8] CLAYTON R B,OSBORNE R E,MILLER B K,et al.Loneliness,anxiousness,and substance use as predictors of Facebook use[J].Comput Hum Behav,2013,29(3):687-693.
[9] 李谨如. 线上社会支持对老年人心理健康的影响研究[D].厦门:厦门大学,2020.
[10] 苏琪. 城市中老年人微信使用对心理健康的影响机制研究[D].济南:山东大学,2021.
[11] 梁晓燕. 网络社会支持对青少年心理健康的影响机制研究[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2008.
[12] 丁道群,沈模卫.人格特质、网络社会支持与网络人际信任的关系[J].心理科学,2005,28(2):300-303.
[13] ELLISON N B,STEINFIELD C,LAMPE C.The benefits of Facebook "friends":Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites[J].J Comput-Mediat Commun,2007,12(4):1143-1168.
[14] 孙晓军,连帅磊,牛更枫,等.社交网站使用对青少年抑郁的影响:上行社会比较的中介作用[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2016,23(1):32-35.
[15] CHENG S,CHAN A.Measuring psychological well-being in the Chinese[J].Pers Individ Differ,2005,38(6):1307-1316.
[16] CHAN D W,CHAN L,SUN X.Developing a brief version of Ryff's scale to assess the psychological well-being of adolescents in Hong Kong[J].Eur J Psychol Assess,2009,35(3):414-422.
[17] PODSAKOFF P M,MACKENZIE S B,LEE J Y,et al.Common method biases in behavioral research:A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies[J].J Appl Psychol,2003,88(5):879-903.
[18] 张明妍,王大华,MICK P,等.老年人重要社会支持的特点及其与老化态度的关系[J].心理科学,2011,34(2):441-446.
[19] 丁轶飞,陈兰双,张镇.老年人社交网络量表在中国的信效度检验[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2022,30(4):909-914.
[20] MATHER M,CARSTENSEN L L.Aging and motivated cognition:the positivity effect in attention and memory[J].Trends Cogn Sci,2005, 9(10):496-502.
[21] ANTONUCCI T C,AJROUCH K J,BIRDITT K S.The convoy model:Explaining social relations from a multidisciplinary perspective[J].Gerontologist,2014,54(1):82-92.
[22] 费文清. 健康老龄化背景下老年健康的社会支持研究[D].南昌:江西财经大学,2021.
[23] 张羽,邢占军.社会支持与主观幸福感关系研究综述[J].心理科学,2007,30(6):1436-1438.
[24] 吴捷. 老年人社会支持、孤独感与主观幸福感的关系[J].心理科学,2008,31(4):984-986.
[25] SULER J R.To get what you need:Healthy and pathological Internet use[J].CyberPsychol Behav,1999,2(5):385-393.
[26] BRANDTZAEG P B.Social networking sites:Their users and social implications—A longitudinal study[J].J Comput-Mediat Commun,2012, 17(4):467-488.
[27] WOOD J V,TAYLOR S E,LICHTMAN R R.Social comparison in adjustment to breast cancer[J].J Pers Soc Psychol,1985,49(5):1169-1183.