职业与健康 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 689-692.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

中药治疗尘肺病的meta分析

李诗婷a, 董蝶雯a, 郑鑫樑b, 崔霖b, 张敏c   

  1. 杭州医学院a医学影像学院,b公共卫生学院,c全科医学与继续教育学院,浙江 杭州 310053
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-22 修回日期:2023-07-24 发布日期:2026-03-16
  • 通信作者: 张敏,助理研究员,E-mail:zhangm@zjams.com.cn
  • 作者简介:李诗婷,女,在读本科生。
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省教育厅一般科研项目(Y202146046); 杭州医学院院所专项(YS2021013); 浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2021KY131)

Meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of pneumoconiosis

LI Shitinga, DONG Diewena, ZHENG Xinliangb, CUI Linb, ZHANG Minc   

  1. a School of Medical Imaging,b School of Public Health,c College of General Practice and Further Education,Hangzhou Medical College,Hangzhou Zhejiang,310053, China
  • Received:2023-06-22 Revised:2023-07-24 Published:2026-03-16
  • Contact: ZHANG Min,Research associate,E-mail:zhangm@zjams.com.cn

摘要: 目的 了解中药对尘肺病的治疗效果。方法 检索2000年12月—2022年6月在国内外医学期刊上发表的中药治疗尘肺病的文献,单纯中药治疗或者中医合并西医治疗为试验组,西医治疗或者安慰剂或者不治疗为对照组。纳入文献17篇,共 1 424例尘肺患者,用Review Manager 5.4进行meta分析。结果 试验组与对照组对比,中药治疗能提高患者临床治疗有效率(OR=6.51,95%CI:3.36~12.64),改善临床呼吸症状(OR=3.29,95%CI:2.50~4.31)、明显改善感染肺部阴影(OR=9.75,95%CI:4.89~19.45)、提高肺功能第1 s用力呼气量(forced expiratory volume in one second,FEV1)(OR=0.98,95%CI:0.43~1.54)、第1 s用力呼气量占用力肺活量百分比(forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity,FEV1/FVC)(OR=6.82,95%CI:4.90~8.74)和第1 s用力呼气容积占预计值百分比(forced expiratory volume in one second/ normal expected value,FEV1%)(OR=8.66,95%CI:6.57~10.75)、明显增加6 min步行试验(6-minute walking test,6 MWT)(OR=45.71,95%CI:27.21~64.21),差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论 中药治疗尘肺病在提高临床治疗有效率、改善临床症状和感染肺部阴影、提高肺功能和增加6MWT等方面有一定优势,但由于纳入研究样本量较少,需要更多高质量研究加以验证。

关键词: 中药, 尘肺病, 治疗, 系统评价

Abstract: Objective To understand the therapeutic effect of traditional Chinese medicine on pneumoconiosis. Methods Literature on the treatment of pneumoconiosis with traditional Chinese medicine published in domestic and foreign medical journals from December 2000 to June 2022 was retrieved. The experimental group was treated with traditional Chinese medicine alone or with traditional Chinese medicine combined with western medicine,and the control group was treated with western medicine or placebo or no treatment. Totally 17 literatures were included,including 1 424 cases of pneumoconiosis,and meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.4. Results Compared with the control group,Chinese medicine treatment can improve the clinical treatment efficiency of patients(OR=6.51,95%CI:3.36-12.64),improve clinical respiratory symptoms(OR=3.29,95%CI:2.50-4.31), significantly improve the shadow of infected lung(OR=9.75,95%CI:4.89-19.45),improve pulmonary function FEV1(OR=0.98, 95%CI:0.43-1.54),FEV1/FVC(OR=6.82,95%CI:4.90-8.74) and FEV1%(OR=8.66,95%CI:6.57-10.75),and significantly increase 6MWT(OR=45.71,95%CI:27.21-64.21),the differences were statistically significance(all P<0.05). Conclusion Traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of pneumoconiosis has certain advantages in improving the clinical treatment efficiency,improving clinical symptoms and infected lung shadows,improving lung function and increasing 6MWT. However,due to the small sample size of the included studies,more high-quality studies are needed to verify.

Key words: Traditional Chinese medicine, Pneumoconiosis, Treatment, System assessment

中图分类号: