基于熵权TOPSIS和秩和比法的广东省卫生人力资源配置差异研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的分析2016—2021年广东省卫生人力资源配置差异化水平,为优化广东省卫生人力资源配置提供参考依据。方法采用熵权TOPSIS法和秩和比法,选取多个卫生人力资源评价指标,对2016—2021年广东省21个市进行评价,度量各地区卫生人力资源配置差异。结果广东省各地区卫生人力资源配置差异化严重,基于熵权TOPSIS法显示,珠三角地区相对接近度最高值为0.981,最低值为0.369;粤东地区相对接近度最高值为0.137,最低值为0.034;粤西地区相对接近度最高值为0.389,最低值为0.285;粤北地区相对接近度最高值为0.599,最低值为0.296,珠三角、粤西、粤北地区卫生人力资源配置水平明显优于粤东地区。结合秩和比法分档显示,广州、珠海、中山、韶关卫生人力资源配置水平处于档次“好”（Probit>6）,档次“差”（Probit<4）为潮州、揭阳、汕尾,其余14个市均为档次“中”（4<Probit<6）。结论广东省医护比例、全科医生资源配置存在明显地区差异,卫生人力资源配置分档结果处于中等水平。对此,应加强注册护士、全科医生人才队伍建设,加强卫生人力资源扩容和区域均衡布局,缩小各地区卫生人力资源配置差异,以改善卫生人力资源配置。

关键词: 卫生人力资源, 熵权TOPSIS法, 秩和比法

Abstract: Objective To analyze the differential level of health human resource allocation in Guangdong Province from 2016 to 2021,and provide reference basis for optimizing the allocation of health human resources in Guangdong Province. Methods The entropy weighted TOPSIS method and rank sum ratio method were used to select multiple health human resource evaluation indicators and evaluate 21 cities in Guangdong Province from 2016 to 2021,measuring the differences in health human resource allocation among different regions. Results There was severe differentiation in the allocation of health human resources among different regions in Guangdong Province. Based on the entropy weighted TOPSIS method,the highest and lowest relative proximity values in the Pearl River Delta region were 0.981 and 0.369,respectively. The highest relative proximity value in the eastern region of Guangdong was 0.137,and the lowest value was 0.034. The highest relative proximity value in the western region of Guangdong was 0.389,and the lowest value was 0.285. The highest relative proximity value in the northern region of Guangdong was 0.599,and the lowest value was 0.296. The allocation level of health human resources in the Pearl River Delta,western Guangdong,and northern Guangdong regions was significantly better than that in the eastern region of Guangdong. According to the rank sum ratio method,the allocation level of health human resources in Guangzhou,Zhuhai,Zhongshan,and Shaoguan was in the "good" level（Probit>6）,while the "poor" level（Probit<4） were Chaozhou,Jieyang,and Shanwei. The other 14 cities were all in the "medium" level（4<Probit<6）. Conclusion There are significant regional differences in the proportion of medical staff and the allocation of general practitioner resources in Guangdong Province,and the results of health human resource allocation are at a moderate level. In this regard,it is necessary to strengthen the construction of talent teams of registered nurses and general practitioners,enhance the expansion of health human resources and regional balanced layout,narrow the differences in health human resource allocation among different regions,and improve the allocation of health human resources.

Key words: Health human resources, Entropy weight TOPSIS method, Rank sum ratio method

中图分类号:

R192

陈媛. 基于熵权TOPSIS和秩和比法的广东省卫生人力资源配置差异研究. [J]职业与健康, 2024, 40(13): 1852-1857.

CHEN Yuan. Study on the differences in the allocation of health human resources in Guangdong Province based on entropy weighted TOPSIS and rank sum ratio method. [J]OCCUPATION AND HEALTH, 2024, 40(13): 1852-1857.

参考文献

[1] 杨荣晓,孙进,李雪文,等.河南省2011—2018年卫生人力资源配置时空差异分析[J].现代预防医学,2021,48(7):1218-1221,1285.
[2] 宾津佑,唐小兵,白福臣.广东省经济发展的区域差异及其时空格局演变[J].湖南师范大学自然科学学报,2021,44(4):62-70.
[3] 贾庆文,曲艺,尤殿平.北京市卫生人力资源配置现状及公平性研究[J].卫生软科学,2022,36(5):62-67.
[4] 曾华堂,杜芳,巩英杰,等.广东省医疗卫生机构及其人力资源配置公平性分析[J].中国卫生经济,2021,40(8):50-55.
[5] 苏彬彬,刘尚君,卢彦君,等.基于集聚度的我国基层卫生人力资源配置评价研究[J].中国卫生政策研究,2021,14(4):49-54.
[6] 黄上玉慧,冯启明,冯俊,等.基于公平与效率的广西妇幼保健机构卫生人力资源配置研究[J].中国卫生统计,2022,39(3):400-404.
[7] 朱斌,毛瑛,何荣鑫,等.中国卫生人力资源配置公平性测量方法及应用综述[J].中国卫生事业管理,2022,39(1):10-16.
[8] 广东省卫生健康委员会政务服务中心. 2016年广东省卫生和计划生育统计年鉴[EB/OL].(2017-04-24)[2023-04-28].https://gdhealth.net.cn/ebook/2016tongjinianjian/mobile/index.html.
[9] 广东省卫生健康委员会政务服务中心. 2017年广东省卫生和计划生育统计年鉴[EB/OL].(2018-10-18)[2023-04-28].https://www.gdhealth.net.cn/ebook/2017tongjinianjian/mobile/index.html#p=1.
[10] 广东省卫生健康委员会政务服务中心. 2018年广东省卫生健康统计年鉴[EB/OL].(2019-04-20)[2023-04-28].https://www.gdhealth.net.cn/ebook/2018tongjinianjian/mobile/index.html#p=1.
[11] 广东省卫生健康委员会政务服务中心. 2019年广东省卫生健康统计年鉴[EB/OL].(2020-04-22)[2023-04-28].https://www.gdhealth.net.cn/ebook/2019tongjinianjian/mobile/index.html#p=1.
[12] 广东省卫生健康委员会事务中心. 2020年广东省卫生健康统计年鉴[EB/OL].(2022-03-09)[2023-04-28].https://www.gdhealth.net.cn/ebook/2020tongjinianjian/mobile/index.html#p=1.
[13] 广东省卫生健康委员会事务中心. 2021年广东省卫生健康统计年鉴[EB/OL].(2022-10-31)[2023-04-28].https://www.gdhealth.net.cn/ebook/2021tongjinianjian/mobile/index.html#p=1.
[14] 朱文鹏,肖月.新医改以来我国卫生人力资源配置公平性研究[J].中国卫生经济,2020,39(2):51-54.
[15] 李婉,韩彩欣.我国西部地区全科医生配置公平性研究——基于基尼系数和集聚度[J].卫生经济研究,2020,37(9):29-32.
[16] 宋佳,范成鑫,艾旭峰,等.基于熵权-TOPSIS结合RSR法的山东省卫生资源配置地区性差异研究[J].现代预防医学,2022,49(3):456-460.
[17] 赵李洋,武春燕,胡善菊,等.基于熵权TOPSIS法乡镇卫生院基本公共卫生服务项目综合评价[J].中国卫生统计,2021,38(6):848-851,859.
[18] 杨方娜,李勇.基于熵权TOPSIS法和RSR法对不同医疗保险下的老年人健康状况评价[J].现代预防医学,2021,48(11):2001-2005.
[19] 曹海军,王梦.基于熵权TOPSIS法辽宁省健康城市建设水平综合评价[J].中国公共卫生,2022,38(9):1214-1218.
[20] 张雅欣,孙华君,杜汋,等.基于熵权TOPSIS与RSR联合模型的天津市基本公共卫生服务效果评价[J].中国预防医学杂志,2021, 22(8):608-612.
[21] 田凤调. RSR法中的分档问题[J].中国卫生统计,1993,10(2): 26-28.
[22] 姚捷,孙志明,施雯慧,等.老龄化背景下江苏省护理人力资源配置公平性研究[J].中国临床研究,2021,34(8):1148-1152.
[23] 袁文辉,苏婉敏,王培席.广东省全科医生配置公平性分析[J].卫生经济研究,2023,40(2):85-88,93.
[24] 广东人才网.“广聚英才计划”解读[EB/OL].(2019-11-01)[2023-05-01].http://www.gdrc.gov.cn/gdrcw/zcjd/201911/c790320a860a4c3f9346a2e6e77d8742.shtml.
[25] 中华人民共和国人力资源和社会保障部.广东中山:实施技能人才五年倍增计划[EB/OL].(2021-04-21)[2023-05-01].http://www.mohrss.gov.cn/SYrlzyhshbzb/rdzt/zyjntsxd/zyjntsxd_xdal/202104/t20210421_413210.html.
[26] 韶关市人民政府.为卫生健康事业高质量发展提供动力——我市用坚实人才引擎拉动医疗行业提速升级[EB/OL].(2023-01-09)[2023-05-01].https://www.sg.gov.cn/ms/ztfw/ldjy/content/post_2354203.html.
[27] 徐碧霞,姚卫光.基于秩和比法评价粤港澳大湾区卫生资源配置现状[J].现代预防医学,2021,48(3):473-476.
[28] 朱长聪,李青华.广东省卫生资源配置公平性分析[J].中国初级卫生保健,2020,34(8):35-38. 责任编辑:张文洁