基于AHP模型构建的高校健康校园综合评价体系

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的构建一套科学合理、实操性强的高校健康校园综合评价指标体系。方法 2022年8月5日—12月23日通过计算机检索中国知网、万方、维普、PubMed、Springer及Web of Science等6个中英文数据库,分析归纳影响高校校园健康的主要指标因素,检索时限为2012年7月—2022年7月,2023年2月20日—4月15日邀请21名专家借助Likert 5级评分法对各指标进行重要性赋值,把重要性均值≥3.50、变异系数<25.00%的指标纳入下一轮。经过3轮德尔菲法确定最终评价指标体系,建立指标层次结构模型,通过层次分析法计算各指标归一权重值,建立高校健康校园综合评价指标体系。结果 3轮专家咨询函回收率分别为100.00%、90.48%、95.24%,提出意见修改百分比分别为85.71%、68.42%、35.00%,全部专家对指标的熟悉程度系数Cs值和权威系数Cr值分别是0.82、0.84,表明专家的积极程度、对指标熟悉程度和权威程度均较高。专家意见协调系数分别为0.26、0.41、0.62（P<0.01）,表明3轮专家咨询后,专家给出的意见拥有比较好的协调性,建立的高校健康校园综合评价指标体系包括5个1级指标、16个2级指标和49个3级指标。结论构建的高校健康校园综合评价体系科学合理,可有效地对高校校园健康进行综合评价。

关键词: 健康校园, 综合评价, 德尔菲法, 层次分析法

Abstract: Objective To construct a set of scientific,reasonable and practical comprehensive evaluation index system for healthy campus in university. Methods From August 5,2022 to December 23,2022,six Chinese and English databases including CNKI,Wanfang,Weipu,PubMed,Springer and Web of Science were searched through computers to analyze and summarize the main index factors that affect campus health in university. The search period was from July 2012 to July 2022. From February 20 to April 15,2023,21 experts were invited to assign importance values to each index using the Likert 5 rating method. Indicators with an average importance of ≥3.50 and a coefficient of variation <25.00% would be included in the next round. After three rounds of Delphi method,the final evaluation index system was determined,and the hierarchical structure model of the index was established,through the analytic hierarchy process（AHP） to calculate the normalized weight of each index,the comprehensive evaluation index system for health campus in university was established. Results The recovery rates of the three rounds of expert consultation letters were 100.00%,90.48% and 95.24%,respectively,and the percentage of the opinions revised were 85.71%,68.42% and 35.00%,respectively,the familiar degree coefficient Cs and authority coefficient Cr of all experts were 0.82 and 0.84,respectively,which indicated that the experts had a high level of enthusiasm,familiarity,and authority. The coordination coefficients of expert opinions were 0.26,0.41 and 0.62（P<0.01）,which indicated that after three rounds of expert consultation,the opinions given by experts had better coordination. The comprehensive evaluation index system for health campus in university included 5 first-class indexes,16 second-class indexes and 49 third-class indexes. Conclusion The comprehensive evaluation system for health campus in university constructed is scientific and reasonable,and can effectively carry out comprehensive evaluation for campus health in university.

Key words: Healthy campus, Comprehensive evaluation, Delphi method, Analytic hierarchy process

中图分类号:

R195

芦万华. 基于AHP模型构建的高校健康校园综合评价体系. [J]职业与健康, 2024, 40(18): 2549-2553.

LU Wanhua. Comprehensive evaluation system for healthy campus in university based on AHP model. [J]OCCUPATION AND HEALTH, 2024, 40(18): 2549-2553.

参考文献

[1] 黎雅思,雷诗琪,韦海妮,等.健康中国背景下大学生的体质健康教育研究[J].农村经济与科技,2019,30(3):293-295.
[2] 于文洁,赵俊林,赵心书.医学院校文化育人路径探索—以青岛大学医学部为例[J].山东高等教育,2022,10(4):22-27.
[3] 王慧芳,王丹波,陈英汉,等.穴位按压缓解宫颈癌术后尿潴留的临床研究[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2015,35(4):425-428.
[4] 潘晓洁. SRS视角下的高校大学生健康管理评价指标体系研究[D].太原:山西医科大学,2018.
[5] 毛阿燕,孟月莉,严晓玲,等.促进健康中国建设中公共卫生体系的职责与使命[J].中国公共卫生,2021,37(9):1313-1318.
[6] 陈筱. 美国学校综合健康教育WSCC模式研究[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2021.
[7] NA P,WENGUANG L,RUOYUAN W,et al.Safety evaluation of commercial vehicle driving behavior using the AHP—critic Algorithm[J].J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ Sci,2023,28(1):126-135.
[8] 王雅晴. 基于层次分析法的数据中心选址研究[D].北京:对外经济贸易大学,2020.
[9] 刘颜颜,付微,张艳霞,等.妊娠期糖尿病患者饮食依从性量表的编制与信效度检验[J].实用临床医学,2023,24(3):113-118,133.
[10] 潘晓洁,郑晓,赵慧宁,等.大学生健康管理能力评价指标体系框架研究[J].卫生软科学,2017,31(8):16-19.
[11] 许新月. 医学类本科院校评价指标体系构建研究[D].重庆:重庆医科大学,2023.
[12] 傅亚丽. 早产儿住院期间家庭参与式护理方案的构建研究[D].重庆:重庆医科大学,2023.
[13] 杨毅,张昕男,田侃.基于Delphi和AHP的公立医院声誉评价指标体系构建[J].中国卫生事业管理,2017,34(4):241-246,283.
[14] JIE L,MU X,YUE J.Building a personalized patient education model for general practice by Delphi method[J].Fam Pract,2023,40(1):105-112.
[15] 海青山,金亚菊.大健康概念的内涵和基本特征[J].中医杂志,2017, 58(13):1085-1088.
[16] 徐墨,苑大勇.公共卫生危机与高等教育治理再反思[J].中国人民大学教育学刊,2021(4):79-94.
[17] 钱俊伟,郑重,安钰峰.新时代中国“健康校园”体系的理论与实践—以北京大学为例[J].北京体育大学学报,2021,44(9):145-155.
[18] 何曦冉. 健康校园规划评价指标体系研究[D].衡阳:南华大学,2021.
[19] 李伟. 正念教养对5-6岁幼儿学习品质的影响:亲子关系的中介作用[D].长春:吉林外国语大学,2023.
[20] 王晶亚. 中医药国际标准实施效果评价指标体系构建与应用研究[D].北京:中国中医科学院,2023.
[21] 任志方,高学莉,王艳玲,等.基于三维质量理论与服务质量评价模型的“互联网+护理服务”质量评价指标体系的构建[J].中国护理管理,2022,22(3):391-396.
[22] ELG,MARIAN R,SELINA A,et al.Storytelling for impact:The creation of a storytelling program for patient partners in research[J].Res Involv Engagem,2023,9(1):57.
[23] MIEHE J.Expanding school-based health centers:Sustainable partnerships and building access[J].J Sch Health,2023,93(10):930-933.
[24] 孙英豪. 现代管理学理论发展及其研究方法探究[J].中国管理信息化,2020,23(22):144-145.