柳州市汽车制造企业职工生命质量现状及影响因素分析

职业与健康 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (19): 2684-2688.

柳州市汽车制造企业职工生命质量现状及影响因素分析

肖荣清^1a, 漆光紫^1abc,2, 唐玉航^1b, 韦俊宏^1abc,2, 曾维德^1a, 庞雅琴^1bcd,2

1.右江民族医学院a公共卫生与管理学院,b基础医学院,c“环境污染与健康风险评价”重点实验室,d医学检验学院,广西百色 533000;;
2.广西高校生态铝工业基地环境与人群健康研究重点实验室,广西百色 533000

收稿日期:2024-01-23 修回日期:2024-02-08 发布日期:2026-03-17
通信作者: 庞雅琴,教授,E-mail：pangyaqin@126.com
作者简介:肖荣清,男,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为环境污染物对人体健康的影响与防治。

Analysis on current situation and influencing factors of quality of life of employees in automobile manufacturing industry in Liuzhou City

XIAO Rongqing^1a, QI Guangzi^1abc,2, TANG Yuhang^1b, WEI Junhong^1abc,2, ZENG Weide^1a, PANG Yaqin^1bcd,2

1. a School of Public Health and Management,b School of Basic Medical Sciences,c Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health Risk Assessment,d School of Medical Laboratory,Youjiang Medical University For Nationalities,Baise,Guangxi 533000,China;
2. Key Laboratory of Environment and Population Health Research,Guangxi University Ecological Aluminum Industrial Base,Baise,Guangxi 533000,China

Received:2024-01-23 Revised:2024-02-08 Published:2026-03-17
Contact: PANG Yaqin,Professor,E-mail：pangyaqin@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的了解柳州市汽车制造企业职工生存质量状况及可能的影响因素,为维护职工身心健康提供参考。方法于2023年2—4月,采用自行设计的问卷和健康调查简表（the medical outcomes study 36-item short from health survey,SF-36）（中文版）对柳州市汽车制造企业1 150名职工进行生命质量调查,并对柳州市汽车制造企业职工生命质量影响因素进行分析。结果柳州市汽车制造企业职工生理功能维度得分为（92.93±13.08）分,生理职能维度得分为（88.07±25.59）分,躯体疼痛维度得分为（94.14±10.83）分,总体健康维度得分为（76.40±17.52）分,活力维度得分为（73.64±16.53）分,社会功能维度得分为（90.20±14.63）分,情感职能维度得分为（88.31±26.34）分,精神健康维度得分为（73.71±14.83）分,生理健康总评分（physical component score,PCS）为（87.88±11.44）分,心理健康总评分（mental component score,MCS）为（81.47±12.92）分。其中职工在躯体疼痛维度得分最高,为（94.14±10.83）分;活力维度得分最低,为（73.64±16.53）分。影响PCS的因素是接害工龄、在岗情况、月收入、教育程度、体质量指数（body mass index,BMI）,影响MCS的因素是接害工龄、在岗情况、饮酒、月收入（均P<0.05）。结论柳州市汽车制造企业职工在躯体健康上得分高于心理健康,应多关心职工的心理及情绪,对影响职工人生存质量的关键影响因素进行调控。

关键词: 汽车制造企业职工, SF-36, 生存质量, 影响因素

Abstract: objective To understand the status of quality of life and its possible influencing factors of employees in automobile manufacturing enterprises in Liuzhou,and provide reference for maintaining the physical and mental health of employees. Methods From February to April 2023,a self-designed questionnaire and the medical outcomes study 36-item short from health survey（SF-36）（Chinese version） was used to investigate the quality of life on 1 150 employees in Liuzhou automobile manufacturing enterprises,and the factors affecting the quality of life of employees in automobile manufacturing enterprises in Liuzhou were analyzed. Results The scores of physiological function dimension,physical function dimension and physical pain dimension of employees in Liuzhou automobile manufacturing enterprises were （92.93±13.08）,（88.07±25.59） and （94.14±10.83）points,respectively. The scores of overall health dimension,vitality dimension,social function dimension and emotional function dimension were （76.40±17.52）,（73.64±16.53）,（90.20±14.63） and （88.31±26.34）points,respectively. The mental health dimension score was （73.71±14.83）points,the physical component score（PCS） was （87.88±11.44）points,and the mental component score（MCS） was （81.47±12.92）points. Among them,employees scored the highest in the dimension of physical pain,at （94.14±10.83）points,the vitality dimension scored the lowest,at （73.64±16.53）points. The factors that affected PCS were length of service,employment status,monthly income,education level,and body mass index（BMI）,while the factors that affected MCS were length of service,employment status,alcohol consumption,and monthly income. Conclusion The score of physical health is higher than that of mental health of employees in automobile manufacturing in Liuzhou. Therefore,more attention should be paid to the psychological and emotional well-being of employees,and key factors affecting their quality of life should be regulated.

Key words: Employees of automobile manufacturing enterprises, the medical outcomes study 36-item short from health survey, Quality of life, Influencing factors

中图分类号:

R181.3⁺7

肖荣清, 漆光紫, 唐玉航, 韦俊宏, 曾维德, 庞雅琴. 柳州市汽车制造企业职工生命质量现状及影响因素分析. [J]职业与健康, 2024, 40(19): 2684-2688.

XIAO Rongqing, QI Guangzi, TANG Yuhang, WEI Junhong, ZENG Weide, PANG Yaqin. Analysis on current situation and influencing factors of quality of life of employees in automobile manufacturing industry in Liuzhou City. [J]OCCUPATION AND HEALTH, 2024, 40(19): 2684-2688.

参考文献

[1] 刘素香. 我国职业卫生形势严峻原因浅析及对策[J].职业卫生与应急救援,2011,29(1):17-19.
[2] TAVAKOLI-FARD N,MORTAZAVI S A,KUHPAYEHZADEH J,et al.Quality of life,work ability and other important indicators of women's occupational health[J].Int J Occup Med Environ Health,2016,29(1):77-84.
[3] 谢克红,赵德发,杨光红.2015—2016年贵州省某煤矿工人生命质量影响因素分析[J].职业与健康,2017,33(4):461-464.
[4] 康利霞. 汽车制造四大工艺质量控制要点[J].汽车实用技术,2018, 44(11):112-114.
[5] 王斌,王冰,刘淼,等.某汽车制造企业职业危害识别及关键控制岗位分析[J].中国卫生工程学,2020,19(2):191-194.
[6] 胡志昊,王娜,刘星,等.饮茶与常见慢性疾病及生化指标的相关性研究[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,2021,29(11):847-850.
[7] 《中国高血压防治指南》修订委员会.中国高血压防治指南(2018年修订版)[J].中国心血管杂志,2019,24(1):24-56.
[8] 李鲁,王红妹,沈毅.SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J].中华预防医学杂志,2002,36(2):38-42.
[9] 李医博. 不同类型职业病危害因素影响暴露企业工人的生命质量调查研究[J].广州医药,2019,50(2):110-112,130.
[10] 林凯平,黄旭,胡浩,等.应用SF-36量表评价低浓度苯系物、正己烷职业接触人群的生命质量[J].职业与健康,2017,33(10):1303-1305.
[11] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.职业健康监护技术规范:GBZ 188—2014[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2014:27-62.
[12] 刘昕,付爱玲,李欣泽,等.2020—2022年乌鲁木齐市煤矿工人职业紧张与心理健康调查[J].中国预防医学杂志,2023,24(10):1009-1014.
[13] 邵华,齐旭光,刘丽萍,等.2021年通辽市煤尘及噪声作业工人职业健康检查结果分析[J].中国卫生工程学,2023,22(4):440-443.
[14] 张缨,万崇华,谭健烽,等.东莞市社区居民生命质量影响因素及其对策研究[J].社区医学杂志,2022,20(19):1067-1071.
[15] 刘丽霞,韩延柏,汪宏莉.青少年晚期大学生体质量指数与健康相关体能关系[J].中国公共卫生,2023,39(5):645-649.
[16] 杨会棉,林恒娜,李超楠.北京市门头沟区成人超重肥胖流行现状及其与常见慢性病的关系[J].应用预防医学,2023,29(2):90-93.
[17] 聂鹰,李铃铃,王月华,等.住院酒依赖患者合并酒精所致其他精神障碍及独立精神障碍的特征[J].中国药物依赖性杂志,2023,32(5):430-435.
[18] 张秋雨,魏辰,杨蕾,等.山东某精神专科医院酒精所致精神障碍的精神疾病共病及相关因素[J].中国药物依赖性杂志,2023,32(1):65-70.