职业与健康 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (14): 1873-1880.

• 论著 •    下一篇

层次分析法在职业病危害风险评估指标体系权重确立中的应用

苏莹1,2, 罗磊2, 李继猛2, 黄邵玲2, 徐明忠2, 肖芳1   

  1. 1.中南大学湘雅公共卫生学院,湖南 长沙 410078;
    2.长沙市疾病预防控制中心,湖南 长沙 410004
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-27 修回日期:2022-11-21 出版日期:2023-07-15 发布日期:2026-03-24
  • 通信作者: 徐明忠,主任技师,E-mail:33087521@qq.com;肖芳,教授,E-mail:fangxiao@csu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:苏莹,女,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为工业毒理。
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省自然科学基金项目(2021JJ30752); 中南大学研究生自主探索创新项目(2022ZZTS0999)

Application of analytic hierarchy process in determiningweight coefficients of index system for occupational hazard risk assessment

SU Ying1,2, LUO Lei2, LI Jimeng2, HUANG Shaoling2, XU Mingzhong2, XIAO Fang1   

  1. 1. Xiangya School of Public Health,Central South University,Changsha Hunan,410078,China;
    2. Changsha Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Changsha Hunan,410004,China
  • Received:2022-10-27 Revised:2022-11-21 Online:2023-07-15 Published:2026-03-24
  • Contact: XU Mingzhong,Chief technician,E-mail:33087521@qq.com;XIAO Fang,Professor,E-mail:fangxiao@csu.edu.cn

摘要: 目的 分析工作场所职业病危害风险评估体系指标,筛选重点评估要素,为卫生行政部门监管和用人单位主体防治提供技术依据。方法 2020年8—12月分别对湖南省职业病防治医务人员、用人单位职业健康管理人员及重点接害作业劳动者进行问卷调查,运用层次分析法建立职业病危害风险评估层次结构,构建两两比较判断矩阵,并对判断矩阵进行一致性检验,确立各级指标的权重。结果 职业病危害风险评估指标体系可分解为9个一级指标,59个二级指标,各层次指标权重系数均满足一致性检验。一级指标权重系数由高到低排列分别为职业病防治医务人员最重视职业健康监护(0.196 9)、职业病危害防护设施(0.169 6)、化学毒物自身特性(0.165 6),用人单位职业健康管理人员最关注职业健康监护(0.198 3)、突发公共卫生事件调查(0.152 5)、应急救援措施(0.135 0),接害劳动者最关心应急救援措施(0.167 3)、职业健康监护(0.154 9)、职业病危害防护设施(0.148 1)。结论 应用层次分析法确立职业病危害风险评估指标体系权重科学可行,可为筛选关键职业病危害风险评估指标和职业病危害风险管理与预防控制提供技术依据。

关键词: 层次分析法, 职业病危害因素, 风险评估, 权重

Abstract: Objective To analyze the indexes of the occupational hazard risk assessment system in the workplace,screen the key assessment elements,and provide technical basis for the supervision of health administration departments and the prevention of employers. Methods From August to December 2020,a questionnaire survey was conducted among the occupational disease prevention and control medical personnel,occupational health management personnel of the employer and key workers exposed to occupational hazards in Hunan Province. The analytic hierarchy process was performed to establish the hierarchical structure of occupational hazard risk assessment,construct a pairwise comparison judgment matrix,and conduct a consistency test on the judgment matrix,in order to determine the weight coefficients of index at all levels. Results The index system of occupational hazard risk assessment can be divided into nine first-level indices and 59 second-level indices. All these index weights satisfied the consistency test. The weight coefficients of the first-level indexes were ranked from high to low as follows:the medical personnel of occupational disease prevention and control paid most attention to occupational health monitoring(0.196 9),the occupational hazard protection facilities(0.169 6),the characteristics of chemical poisons(0.165 6),the occupational health management personnel of the employer attached great importance to occupational health monitoring(0.198 3),the investigation of public health emergencies (0.152 5), the emergency rescue measures(0.135 0),exposed workers paid most attention to emergency rescue measures(0.167 3),the occupational health surveillance(0.154 9),and the protective facilities for occupational hazards(0.148 1). Conclusion It is scientific and feasible to determine the weight of index system for occupational hazard risk assessment by using analytic hierarchy process,which is conducive to screening key indexes of occupational hazard risk assessment and providing technical basis for occupational hazard risk management,prevention and control.

Key words: Analytic hierarchy process, Occupational hazard factors, Risk assessment, Weight

中图分类号: