天津市某电子元件制造企业职业病危害因素现状调查

职业与健康 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (22): 3050-3054.

天津市某电子元件制造企业职业病危害因素现状调查

郭笑笑¹, 封琳敏¹, 张慧庆², 刘静¹

1.天津市疾病预防控制中心职业病健康研究所,天津 300011;
2.天津医科大学公共卫生学院,天津 300070

收稿日期:2023-04-04 修回日期:2023-05-09 出版日期:2023-11-15 发布日期:2026-03-26
通信作者: 刘静,副主任医师,E-mail：liujing6@tj.gov.cn
作者简介:郭笑笑,女,工程师,主要从事职业病危害监测与防控工作。
基金资助:
天津市医学重点建设学科（TJYXZDXK-066B）

Investigation on current situation of occupational hazard factors in an electronic component manufacturing enterprise in Tianjin

GUO Xiaoxiao¹, FENG Linmin¹, ZHANG Huiqing², LIU Jing¹

1. Institute for Occupational Health,Tianjin Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,Tianjin 300011,China;
2. School of Public Health,Tianjin Medical University,Tianjin 300070,China

Received:2023-04-04 Revised:2023-05-09 Online:2023-11-15 Published:2026-03-26
Contact: LIU Jing,Associate chief physician,E-mail：liujing6@tj.gov.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的掌握天津市某电子元件制造企业生产环节存在的主要职业病危害因素种类及暴露程度,评价该企业作业环境职业病危害暴露现状是否符合职业病防治要求,根据存在问题提出针对性改进措施。方法于2021年8—9月对该企业进行职业卫生调查、职业病危害因素检测,并结合职业健康检查结果等资料对劳动者的接触水平及所采取的职业健康措施进行综合分析与评价。结果该企业现有项目主要职业病危害因素有噪声、二甲苯、异丙醇、丙酮、丁酮、二氧化锡、环己酮、石墨粉尘及树脂粉尘等,物理和化学有害因素的检测结果均符合要求,其中噪声8 h等效声级为68.1~84.0 dB（A）,存在噪声作业岗位。2019—2021年职业健康监护资料显示,双耳高频听力损失人数呈上升趋势。结论噪声为天津市某电子元件制造企业职业病危害防控的重点,该企业现有防噪声、防粉尘等防护措施能显著降低作业环境职业病危害因素浓度。职业卫生管理较为完善,现状评价结果基本符合国家标准,但噪声防护需进一步加强,应定期开展职业健康检查。

关键词: 电子元件, 现状调查, 职业健康

Abstract: Objective To master the types and exposure degree of the leading occupational hazards existing in the production process of an electronic component manufacturing enterprise in Tianjin,evaluate whether the current situation of occupational hazard exposure in the working environment of the enterprise meets the requirements for the prevention and control of occupational diseases,and propose targeted improvement measures according to the existing problems. Methods The occupational health survey and occupational hazard factor detection in the enterprise were conducted from August to September 2021,and the comprehensive analysis and evaluation were performed on the exposure level of workers and the occupational health measures taken in combination with the occupational health examination results and other data. Results The main occupational hazard factors of the current project in the enterprise included noise,xylene,isopropanol,acetone,butanone,tin dioxide,cyclohexanone,graphite dust,and resin dust. The detection results of the physical and chemical hazardous factors of the enterprise met the requirements,of which the equivalent sound level of noise for 8 hours was 68.1-84.0 dB（A）,and there were noise jobs. The occupational health monitoring data from 2019 to 2021 showed that the number of people with high frequency hearing loss in both ears showed an upward trend. Conclusions The noise is the key point of prevention and control of occupational hazards in an electronic component manufacturing enterprise in Tianjin,and the existing protective measures against noise and dust can significantly reduce the concentration of occupational hazards in the working environment. The occupational health management is relatively complete,and the current evaluation results basically meet the national standards,but the noise protection needs to be further strengthened,and the occupational health inspection should be carried out regularly.

Key words: Electronic components, Current situation surveys, Occupational health

中图分类号:

R134⁺.2

郭笑笑, 封琳敏, 张慧庆, 刘静. 天津市某电子元件制造企业职业病危害因素现状调查. [J]职业与健康, 2023, 39(22): 3050-3054.

GUO Xiaoxiao, FENG Linmin, ZHANG Huiqing, LIU Jing. Investigation on current situation of occupational hazard factors in an electronic component manufacturing enterprise in Tianjin. [J]OCCUPATION AND HEALTH, 2023, 39(22): 3050-3054.

参考文献

[1] 卫婷婷,梅良英.我国电子行业职业暴露及对女工健康危害的现状[J].中华预防医学杂志,2018,52(2):206-209.
[2] 徐凯丽,杨红,谢景欣,等.我国电子行业职业病危害与防护现状[J].环境与职业医学,2018,35(6):572-577.
[3] 范银华,丁浩,刘利岳,等广州市电子企业有机溶剂职业危害现状调查[J].中国卫生工程学,2017,16(5):559-562.
[4] 国家安全生产监督管理总局.电子工业防尘防毒技术规范:AQ 4201—2008[S].北京:煤炭工业出版社,2009:1-11.
[5] 中华人民共和国职业病防治法[J].中国工业医学杂志,2019,32(1):3-9.
[6] 国家市场监督管理总局,国家标准化管理委员会.个体防护装备配备规范第1部分:总则:GB 39800.1—2020[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2020:1-24.
[7] 中华人民共和国卫生部.工作场所有害因素职业接触限值第1部分:化学有害因素:GBZ 2.1—2019[S].北京:人民卫生出版社,2019:4-35.
[8] 中华人民共和国卫生部.工作场所有害因素职业接触限值第2部分:物理因素:GBZ 2.2—2007[S].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:2-6.
[9] 中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.职业健康监护技术规范:GBZ 188—2014[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2014:1-107.
[10] 中华人民共和国卫生部.工作场所空气中有害物质监测的采样规范:GBZ 159—2004[S].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:1-7.
[11] 中华人民共和国卫生部.工作场所空气中粉尘测定第1部分:总粉尘浓度:GBZ/T 192.1—2007[S].北京:人民卫生出版社,2007:1-3.
[12] 丁璐,胡凤霞,姚建华,等.苏州市某电子设备制造企业职业病危害现状评价[J].职业与健康,2018,34(24):3313-3317.
[13] 杨光涛,香映平,朱晓玲,等.深圳市39家电子企业有机溶剂职业病危害现状调查[J].中国职业医学,2019,46(3):403-406.
[14] 田亚锋,陈智健,王丽华,等.深圳市某区电子行业噪声职业健康危害状况[J].职业与健康,2019,35(23):3285-3287.
[15] 吴鑫,皮嵩云,陈秀兵,等.长沙市某电子设备制造企业噪声作业人群听力损失现状及趋势分析[J].职业与健康,2020,36(11):1441-1444.
[16] 张晓玲,龚伟.某电子企业工作场所中职业病危害分析与治理对策[J].职业与健康,2015,31(19):2593-2596,600.
[17] 胡浩,林凯平,张志杰.深圳市某电子企业职业卫生状况5年动态观察[J].职业与健康,2017,33(9):1153-1155.
[18] 赖晖,胡凯,皮伟.321家制造企业职业卫生现状调查分析[J].公共卫生与预防医学,2019,30(6):55-58.
[19] 温先华,曾燕萍,薛晓辉.漳州市某电子专用设备制造企业职业病危害现状评价[J].职业与健康,2017,33(7):865-868,871.
[20] 刘军,余青,李燕.基于城市大数据的企业职业病危害现状调查[J].公共卫生与预防医学,2021,32(5):71-75.
[21] 段佳丽,吴能简.深圳市坪山区家具制造企业职业卫生管理干预效果研究[J].江苏预防医学,2022,33(5):596-599.
[22] 马奎,王雪涛,纪蒙蒙,等.天津市某农药厂职业病危害现状与对策[J].职业与健康,2022,38(21):2889-2893,2898.
[23] 臧静,魏振江,孙瑞霞.石化钻井行业工程服务公司职业病危害调查与现状评价[J].职业与健康,2022,38(21):2885-2888.
[24] 徐少文. 佛山市某涂料生产企业职业病危害现状评价[J].绿色科技,2019(12):150-153.
[25] 任绍梅,徐明伟,王薇,等.芯片制造业电子化学品职业病危害因素及案例研究[J].北京石油化工学院学报,2021,29(4):56-61,70.