基于SCL-90的中国潜艇部队官兵心理状况影响因素系统评价

职业与健康 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (23): 3284-3288.

基于SCL-90的中国潜艇部队官兵心理状况影响因素系统评价

谭坤^a, 梁景童^b, 崔阳^c, 肖楚兰^d

解放军联勤保障部队第九二医院 a药剂科,b内分泌科,c心内科,d中医科,云南昆明 650000

收稿日期:2024-04-10 修回日期:2024-05-07 出版日期:2024-12-01 发布日期:2026-04-09
通信作者: 肖楚兰,主治医师,E-mail：741974508@qq.com
作者简介:谭坤,男,药师,主要从事临床药学与军事医学研究工作。
基金资助:
联勤保障部队第九二医院院管课题（2023YGY29）

Systematic evaluation of factors influencing the psychological status of Chinese submarine force officers and soldiers based on SCL-90

TAN Kun^a, LIANG Jingtong^b, CUI Yang^c, XIAO Chulan^d

a Department of Pharmacy, b Department of Endocrinology, c Department of Cardiology, d Traditional Chinese Medicine Department,PLA Joint Logistics Support Force 920 Hospital,Kunming,Yunnan 650000,China

Received:2024-04-10 Revised:2024-05-07 Online:2024-12-01 Published:2026-04-09
Contact: XIAO Chulan,Attending physician,E-mail：741974508@qq.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的基于症状自评量表（symptom checklist 90,SCL-90）结果,探究中国潜艇部队官兵心理健康状况影响因素及其发展变化趋势。方法利用Review Manager 5.3软件对中国知网（CNKI）、维普（VIP）、万方（Wanfang）等数据库自建库以来关于中国潜艇部队官兵SCL-90相关调查研究进行整理分析,根据不同影响因素进行系统评价。结果共纳入9篇文献、20个组别,潜艇部队官兵共1 395人。潜艇部队官兵航后航前心理状况差异meta分析结果显示,潜艇部队官兵航后相较于航前的9个SCL-90因子平均效应量均为正值,其中躯体化、强迫、人际敏感、抑郁、焦虑、敌对、恐怖及精神病的差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）,而偏执的差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）;核潜艇和常规潜艇心理状况差异meta亚组分析结果显示,核潜艇部队官兵总体的SCL-90因子相较于2016年军人常模的平均效应量均为正值,且躯体化、强迫、人际敏感、抑郁、焦虑、恐怖、偏执及精神病性的差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.01）,仅敌对的差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。常规潜艇官兵各SCL-90因子评分相较于2016年军人常模,仅躯体化、强迫及抑郁的差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.01）,且d值为正值,而人际敏感、焦虑、敌对、恐怖、偏执及精神病性的差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）,且敌对、恐怖及偏执因子的d值为负值。结论基于SCL-90结果,中国潜艇部队官兵航后的整体心理健康状况显著低于航前。核潜艇官兵的整体心理健康状况较2016年军人常模差,而常规潜艇官兵的整体心理健康状况虽不及2016年军人常模,但却优于核潜艇官兵,其敌对、恐怖及偏执情绪水平低于2016年军人常模。

关键词: 症状自评量表, 潜艇部队, Meta分析

Abstract: Objective Based on the results of the symptom checklist 90（SCL-90）,this study aims to explore the influencing factors and development trends of the psychological health status of Chinese submarine troops. Methods The Review Manager 5.3 software was used to organize and analyze the investigation and research on SCL-90 related to Chinese submarine troops in databases such as CNKI,VIP,and Wanfang since their establishment. A systematic evaluation was conducted based on different influencing factors. Results A total of 9 articles and 20 groups were included,with a total of 1 395 officers and soldiers in the submarine unit. The meta-analysis results of the psychological status differences between submarine force officers and soldiers before and after the voyage showed that the average effect sizes of 9 SCL-90 factors after the voyage was positive compared to before the voyage. Among them,the differences in somatization,compulsion,interpersonal sensitivity,depression,anxiety,hostility,terror and psychosis were statistically significant（all P<0.05）,while the differences in paranoia were not statistically significant（P>0.05）. The results of meta-analysis on the differences in psychological status between nuclear submarines and conventional submarines showed that the overall SCL-90 factor of officers and soldiers in the nuclear submarine force was positive compared to the average effect size of the military norm in 2016,and the differences in somatization,compulsion,interpersonal sensitivity,depression,anxiety,terror,paranoia,and psychosis were statistically significant（all P<0.01）,while only the differences in hostility were not statistically significant（P>0.05）. Compared with the 2016 military norm,the SCL-90 factor scores of conventional submarine officers and soldiers showed statistically significant differences only in somatization,compulsion,and depression（all P<0.01）,with positive d values. However,there were no statistically significant differences in interpersonal sensitivity,anxiety,hostility,terror,paranoia,and psychosis（all P>0.05）,with negative d values for hostility,terror,and paranoia factors. Conclusion Based on the SCL-90 results,the overall psychological health status of Chinese submarine officers and soldiers after voyage is significantly lower than before voyage. The overall psychological health status of nuclear submarine officers and soldiers is significantly lower than the 2016 military norm,while the overall psychological health status of conventional submarine officers and soldiers is lower than the 2016 military norm,but better than that of nuclear submarine officers and soldiers. Moreover,their levels of hostility,terror,and paranoia are even lower than the 2016 military norm.

Key words: Symptom checklist 90, Submarine force, Meta-analysis

中图分类号:

R181.2

谭坤, 梁景童, 崔阳, 肖楚兰. 基于SCL-90的中国潜艇部队官兵心理状况影响因素系统评价. [J]职业与健康, 2024, 40(23): 3284-3288.

TAN Kun, LIANG Jingtong, CUI Yang, XIAO Chulan. Systematic evaluation of factors influencing the psychological status of Chinese submarine force officers and soldiers based on SCL-90. [J]OCCUPATION AND HEALTH, 2024, 40(23): 3284-3288.

参考文献

[1] 石玥,余涛,刘焕亮,等.潜艇舱室环境理化因素对艇员健康影响的研究进展[J].职业与健康,2022,38(5):716-720.
[2] 李新利,李清果,姜玉奇,等.潜艇远航卫勤保障[J].解放军医院管理杂志,2016,23(7):643-644.
[3] 谢华. SCL-90量表品质及其在我国心理健康测量中的应用评价[D].南昌:江西师范大学,2005.
[4] 李逢战,邱凡硕,周姿言,等.中国军人症状自评量表测评结果的横断历史研究[J].空军军医大学学报,2022,44(5):461-466.
[5] 汪洋. Cochrane偏倚风险评估工具简介[J].中国全科医学,2019,22(11):1322.
[6] 邱兴旺,孙香萍.近10年中国岛礁驻守部队官兵SCL-90结果的Meta分析[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2021,29(6):912-918.
[7] 刘关键,吴泰相,康德英.Meta-分析中的统计学过程[J].中国临床康复,2003,7(4):538-539.
[8] 郑昊敏,温忠麟,吴艳.心理学常用效应量的选用与分析[J].心理科学进展,2011,19(12):1868-1878.
[9] 王强,许毅,施步程,等.潜艇艇员出海训练对心理卫生影响的调查[J].中华航海医学杂志,1997,4(3):12-15.
[10] 余浩,李政年,项光强,等.长航对潜艇艇员心理的影响[J].海军医学杂志,1999,20(1):33-35.
[11] 赵红,吴力克,梁冰,等.水面舰艇及核潜艇长航对艇员心理健康水平的影响[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2002,20(5):332-335.
[12] 黄兴,许家央.潜艇艇员远航前后心理状态分析[J].国防卫生论坛,2004,13(1):52-53.
[13] 马海鹰,张小远,肖蓉,等.海军舰艇舰员的心理健康评估及与人格特征的相关性研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2005,13(5):361-363.
[14] 谢喜强. 潜艇密闭作业环境艇员健康评价[D].重庆:第三军医大学,2013.
[15] 卢山,许鹏,徐珺洋,等.潜艇官兵出海前后心理健康状态比较分析[J].中国疗养医学,2014,23(6):543-544.
[16] 倪伟. 长潜任务对潜艇艇员心理健康的影响[D].北京:中国人民解放军军事医学科学院,2014.
[17] 刘晓峰,王额尔敦,阎少波,等.核潜艇远航艇员心理健康状况调查与分析[J].解放军预防医学杂志,2016,34(3):396-397.
[18] 李征斌,王海涛.潜艇艇员心理健康状况调查及干预措施研究概述[J].海军医学杂志,2015,36(1):71-73.
[19] GERETTO M,FERRARI M,DE ANGELIS R,et al.Occupational exposures and environmental health hazards of military personnel[J].Int J Environ Res Public Health,2021,18(10):5395.
[20] 张洪彬. 潜艇空气污染与污染检测技术[J].舰船科学技术,2006,28(2):5-8.
[21] MILLER A C,GILSTAD J,BRENNER D J.Military global health engagement and low-dose ionizing radiation[J].Mil Med,2017,182(9):1677-1679.
[22] 张冬梅,王宏,于丽华.某部涉核官兵核辐射损伤体检项目结果分析[J].实用医药杂志,2016,33(9):773-774.
[23] VELEZ D L C J,RACHOU E,LE MARTELOT M T,et al.Male infertility risk factors in a French military population[J].Hum Reprod,2001, 16(3):481-486.
[24] 李立新,吕晓鹏,莫东平,等.接触放射性物质官兵职业健康研究进展[J].人民军医,2017,60(11):1071-1074.
[25] BLAKE P K,KOMP G R.Radiation exposure of U.S.military individuals[J].Health Phys,2014,106(2):272-278.
[26] 翁鸿,王颖,李柄辉,等.系统评价与Meta分析的类型及制作步骤[J].同济大学学报(医学版),2019,40(2):248-253.