本科护生劳动素养测评量表的编制及信效度检验

职业与健康 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 390-394.

本科护生劳动素养测评量表的编制及信效度检验

王佳誉^a, 吴奇瑶^b, 苗慧^a, 王立妍^b, 曹亭^b, 王汕珊^b

天津中医药大学 a研究生院,b护理学院,天津 301617

收稿日期:2024-04-12 修回日期:2024-05-08 出版日期:2025-02-01 发布日期:2025-12-17
通信作者: 王汕珊,副教授,E-mail：rainshan_shan@163.com
作者简介:王佳誉,男,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为护理教育。
基金资助:
天津市教育科学规划课题（CIE220075）

Development of labor literacy scale for undergraduate nursing students and testing of reliability and validity

WANG Jiayu^a, WU Qiyao^b, MIAO Hui^a, WANG Liyan^b, CAO Ting^b, WANG Shanshan^b

a Graduate School,b School of Nursing,Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Tianjin 301617,China

Received:2024-04-12 Revised:2024-05-08 Online:2025-02-01 Published:2025-12-17
Contact: WANG Shanshan,Associate professor,E-mail：rainshan_shan@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的编制本科护生劳动素养测评量表并检验其信效度。方法通过文献回顾、德尔菲专家函询和预调查对量表条目进行修订和筛选,形成量表初稿。2023年5—6月选取天津市某高校450名本科护生进行问卷调查,检验量表信效度。结果本科护生劳动素养测评量表包含4个维度,22个条目。量表总Cronbach’s α系数为0.929,各维度Cronbach’s α系数在0.738~0.906之间,分半信度为0.866;总量表内容效度指数为1.00;探索性因子分析共提取出4个公因子,累计方差贡献率为61.502%;验证性因子分析显示模型拟合度良好。结论本科护生劳动素养测评量表信效度良好,可用于测量本科护生劳动素养情况。

关键词: 劳动素养, 量表编制, 本科护生, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To develop a labor literacy scale for undergraduate nursing students and test its reliability and validity. Methods The literature review,Delphi expert consultation and pre-investigation were used to revise and filter scale items,to form the first draft of the scale. From May to June 2023,450 undergraduate nursing students from a university in Tianjin were selected to conduct a questionnaire survey to test the reliability and validity of the scale. Results There were four dimensions and 22 items in the labor literacy scale for undergraduate nursing students. The total Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.929,the Cronbach's α coefficients of each dimension were 0.738-0.906,and the split-half reliability was 0.866.The content validity index of the total scale was 1.00. Four common factors were selected in exploratory factor analysis,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 61.502%. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model fit well. Conclusion The reliability and validity of the labor literacy scale for undergraduate nursing students is good,which can be used to measure the labor literacy of the undergraduate nursing students.

Key words: Labor literacy, Scale development, Undergraduate nursing student, Reliability, Validity

中图分类号:

R181.2

王佳誉, 吴奇瑶, 苗慧, 王立妍, 曹亭, 王汕珊. 本科护生劳动素养测评量表的编制及信效度检验. [J]职业与健康, 2025, 41(3): 390-394.

WANG Jiayu, WU Qiyao, MIAO Hui, WANG Liyan, CAO Ting, WANG Shanshan. Development of labor literacy scale for undergraduate nursing students and testing of reliability and validity. [J]OCCUPATION AND HEALTH, 2025, 41(3): 390-394.

参考文献

[1] 中共中央国务院关于全面加强新时代大中小学劳动教育的意见[EB/OL].(2020-03-20)[2024-03-30].http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/202003/t20200326_435127.html,2020-03-20.
[2] 教育部关于印发《大中小学劳动教育指导纲要(试行)》的通知[EB/OL].(2020-07-09)[2024-03-30].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A26/jcj_kcjcgh/202007/t20200715_472808.html.
[3] 王正青,刘涛,杜娇阳,等.新时代大学生劳动素养测评模型构建与测度研究[J].现代教育管理,2021(6):81-89.
[4] 谢春晓,孙丽媛,张筱晗.劳动教育在基础护理学实训教学中的应用研究[J].护理学杂志,2023,38(13):52-56.
[5] 刘明,WIPADA KUNAIKTIKUL,WILAWAN SENARATANA,等.中国注册护士能力架构的质性研究[J].中华护理杂志,2006,41(8):691-694.
[6] 杨玉美,王丽波,李艳双,等.层次分析法构建本科实习护生核心能力评价指标体系[J].护理学杂志,2015,30(2):63-68.
[7] 吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务——SPSS操作与应用[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2010:158-224.
[8] 张正敏,冯现刚,梁素娟,等.重症监护室护士职业悲伤支持量表的编制及信效度检验[J].解放军护理杂志,2021,38(12):9-12.
[9] 吴明隆. 结构方程模型:AMOS的操作与应用[M].2版.重庆大学出版社,2010:167-168.
[10] 王芳,费文玲,金曼,等.成人健康素养量表的汉化和信效度检验[J].军事护理,2023,40(7):73-76.
[11] 肖霖,吴秀梅,彭美芳,等.癌症患者参与治疗决策测评量表的编制及信效度检验[J].军事护理,2022,39(11):9-12.
[12] 李峥,刘宇.护理学研究方法[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:113-114.
[13] 檀传宝. 劳动教育的概念理解——如何认识劳动教育概念的基本内涵与基本特征[J].中国教育学刊,2019(2):82-84.
[14] 龚春燕,魏文锋,程艳霞.劳动素养:新时代人才必备素养[J].中小学管理,2020(4):9-11.
[15] 何静. 新时代大学生劳动教育的现状与实践路径探究[D].成都:西华大学,2021.
[16] 秦一帆. 新时代大学生劳动素养的实证研究[D].太原:山西师范大学,2021.
[17] 谭见君. 高职院校“三维度四策略”劳动教育模式研究[J].教育与职业,2022(17):103-107.
[18] 李立伟,黄晓梅.在校护生从事机构养老工作意愿影响因素的质性研究[J].中国老年学杂志,2019,39(23):5820-5823.
[19] 王建荣,丁淑贞,桑甜.本科护生职业认同与自我同一性的相关关系研究[J].护理管理杂志,2017,17(9):620-622.