生物安全实验室人员职业倦怠的常模构建

职业与健康 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (10): 1302-1305.

生物安全实验室人员职业倦怠的常模构建

巨珂珂¹, 刘琦¹, 高孙玉洁², 卢耀勤³

1.新疆医科大学公共卫生学院,新疆乌鲁木齐 830054;
2.新疆军区保障部疾病预防控制中心传染病防控科,新疆乌鲁木齐 831499;
3.乌鲁木齐市疾病预防控制中心科教科,新疆乌鲁木齐 830026

收稿日期:2022-07-07 修回日期:2023-02-06 发布日期:2026-03-13
通信作者: 卢耀勤,副主任医师,E-mail：lyq_superior@163.com
作者简介:巨珂珂,男,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为劳动卫生与环境卫生学。
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金（2020D0A27）

Norm construction of job burnout of biosafety laboratory staff

JU Ke-ke¹, LIU Qi¹, GAOSUN Yu-jie², LU Yao-qin³

1. School of Public Health,Xinjiang Medical University,Urumqi Xinjiang 830054,China;
2. Infectious Disease Prevention and Control Department,Center for Disease Control and Prevention of Xinjiang Military Region Support Department,Urumqi Xinjiang 831499,China;
3. Science and Education Department,Urumqi Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Urumqi Xinjiang 830026,China

Received:2022-07-07 Revised:2023-02-06 Published:2026-03-13
Contact: LU Yao-qin,Associate chief physician,E-mail：lyq_superior@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的建立生物安全实验室工作人员通用版倦怠量表（mbi-general survey,MBI-GS）常模,为生物安全实验室工作人员职业倦怠状况的进一步研究提供参考依据。方法 2020年12月—2021年5月采用整群抽样的方式,按照性别、年龄、文化程度、工龄等统计学指标,用MBI-GS对新疆地区生物安全实验室7 911名职工的职业倦怠状况进行调查,采用两独立样本t检验（或t’检验）和单因素方差分析对不同统计学变量工作倦怠得分进行比较,分别建立均数常模、分类常模、百分位数常模和划界常模。结果总体同质信度（Cronbach’s α）系数为0.872,折半信度（Guttman）值为0.939,各分量表相关性为0.059~0.660（均P<0.01）,KMO值为0.924,信度、效度良好。7 911名生物安全实验室工作人员MBI-GS量表职业倦怠得分方面,不同性别、文化程度比较,差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）,不同年龄、工龄、职称、岗位类别、婚姻状况比较,差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.01）。结论生物安全实验室工作人员MBI-GS量表具有良好的信度和效度。本研究建立了生物安全实验室工作人员职业倦怠常模,为生物安全实验室工作人员职业倦怠的研究提供线索和依据,也对生物安全实验室工作人员的健康管理和改善职业倦怠提供一定的参考依据。

关键词: 通用版倦怠量表, 常模, 生物安全实验室人员

Abstract: Objective To establish the norm of job burnout scale（mbi-general survey,MBI-GS） for biosafety laboratory staff,provide theoretical basis and reference for further research on job burnout of biosafety laboratory staff. Methods From December 2020 to May 2021,by a cluster sampling method,according to statistical indicators such as gender,age,education level,and length of service,the MBI-GS scale was used to in vestigate the status of job burnout of 7 911 employees in biosafety laboratories in Xinjiang. The two independent samples t test（t' test） and one-way ANOVA were used to compare job burnout scores of different statistical indicators,and the norms of mean,classification,percentile and demarcation were established. Results The total homogeneity reliability（Cronbach’s α） was 0.872,half reliability（Guttman） was 0.939,the correlation of each subscale was 0.059-0.665（all P<0.01）,and KMO value was 0.924,indicating good reliability and validity.Among 7 911 biosafety laboratory employees,the differences in the job burnout score of MBI-GS scale were statistically significant among groups in different gender and education level（all P<0.05）,and the differences were statistically significant among groups in different age,length of service,title,job category and marital status（all P<0.05）. Conclusion The MBI-GS scale for biosafety laboratory staff has good reliability and validity.This study establishes a norm for job burnout among biosafety laboratory staff,provides clues and basis for the study of job burnout of biosafety laboratory staff,and also provides certain reference basis for health management and improvement of job burnout of biosafety laboratory staff.

Key words: MBI-general survey, Norm, Biosafety laboratory staff

中图分类号:

R181.3⁺1

巨珂珂, 刘琦, 高孙玉洁, 卢耀勤. 生物安全实验室人员职业倦怠的常模构建. [J]职业与健康, 2023, 39(10): 1302-1305.

JU Ke-ke, LIU Qi, GAOSUN Yu-jie, LU Yao-qin. Norm construction of job burnout of biosafety laboratory staff. [J]OCCUPATION AND HEALTH, 2023, 39(10): 1302-1305.

参考文献

[1] RODRIGUES H,COBUCCI R,OLIVEIRA A,et al.Burnout syndrome among medical residents:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].PLoS One,2018,13(11):e0206840.
[2] ŞANLITURK D.Perceived and sources of occupational stress in intensive care nurses during the covid-19 pandemic[J].Intensive Crit Care Nurs,2021,67:103107.
[3] 王冬冬.同情心疲乏、职业倦怠对护理人员离职意愿的影响研究[D].锦州:锦州医科大学,2016.
[4] DULKO D,ZANGARO G.Comparison of factors associated with physician and nurse burnout[J].Nurs Clin North Am,2022,57(1):53-66.
[5] 曹蕾,曾德唯,曾艺,等.基层疾控公共卫生人员职业倦怠现状及影响因素[J].现代医药卫生,2021,37(17):2893-2898.
[6] 高健,王秀云,于春泉,等.天津地区护士职业倦怠状况及其影响因素[J].职业与健康,2012,28(3):278-281.
[7] 张利,阙建宇,王一杰,等.新冠肺炎疫情期间精神卫生工作者职业倦怠与心理健康相关性[J].中国药物依赖性杂志,2021,30(6):428-434.
[8] 李超平,时勘.分配公平与程序公平对工作倦怠的影响[J].心理学报,2003,35(5):677-684.
[9] 林春梅,黄益苗.粤西地区中职卫生学校“双师型”护理教师工作倦怠状况的调查[J].卫生职业教育,2016,34(14):113-114,115.
[10] 朱伟,娄小平,王治明.Maslash工作倦怠量表通用版在护理人员中应用的信度与效度评价[J].中国行为医学科学,2007,16(9):849-851.
[11] BIANCHI R,SCHONFELD I S,LAURENT E.Is it time to consider the "burnout syndrome" a distinct illness?[J].Front Public Health,2015,3:158.
[12] 林红梅,艾海霞,郭先一,等.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情下一线医护工作者职业压力的影响因素[J].武汉大学学报(医学版),2021,42(5):729-732.
[13] 邱倩文,黄冰,张弘玥,等.新冠肺炎疫情期间疾控人员工作状况及情绪耗竭的影响因素分析[J].暨南大学学报(自然科学与医学版),2020,41(6):534-542.
[14] 徐彭杰,李东文,徐朝霞,等.新型冠状病毒流行期间急诊护士工作倦怠水平及其影响因素[J].西南军医,2021,23(Z1):458-461.
[15] 陈秋竹,吴思娴,余洋,等.新型冠状病毒肺炎COVID-19的实验室诊断技术及相关疾病的鉴别诊断[J].中国测试,2020,46(3):64-72.
[16] 丁悦娜,袁璧斐,刘金也,等.三级生物安全防护实验室职业紧张分析[J].中国比较医学杂志,2014,24(10):82-89.
[17] MASLACH C,JACKSON S E.The measurement of experienced burnout[J].J Organ Behav,1981,2(2):99-113.
[18] MASLACH C,SCHAUFELI W B,LEITER M P.Job burnout[J].Annu Rev Psychol,2001,52(1):397-422.
[19] 李静,尔西丁·买买提,李豫凯.新疆高校涉密人员职业倦怠现状及其影响因素[J].新疆医学,2018,48(4):410-413.
[20] 王敏.某院心外科重症监护室护理人员MBI-GS评分的影响因素分析及干预策略[J].检验医学与临床,2022,19(2):271-273.
[21] 于萍,孙启隆.基于MBI-GS量表的高校青年教师职业倦怠研究[J].继续教育研究,2012(11):89-90.
[22] 梁东如,张丽,孟杨.临床医护人员职业倦怠相关因素及其与职业生涯规划关系[J].华南预防医学,2021,47(12):1625-1628.
[23] 李雪.新疆某三甲医院医务人员职业紧张、职业倦怠与工作能力的相关性研究[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆医科大学,2014.