职业与健康 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 606-612.

• 论著 • 上一篇    

太原市某高效单晶电池项目职业健康风险评估

王震1, 寇志萍2, 赵晓鹏2, 李帅2   

  1. 1.山西医科大学公共卫生学院,山西 太原 030001;
    2.山西弘茂技术服务有限公司,山西 太原 030002
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-14 修回日期:2022-08-15 发布日期:2026-03-03
  • 作者简介:王震,男,讲师,主要从事职业病危害评价工作。

Occupational health risk assessment of a high-efficiency monocrystalline battery project in Taiyuan City

WANG Zhen1, KOU Zhi-ping2, ZHAO Xiao-peng2, LI Shuai2   

  1. 1. School of Public Health,Shanxi Medical University,Taiyuan Shanxi 030001,China;
    2. Shanxi HongMao Technology Service Co.,Ltd.,Taiyuan Shanxi 030002,China
  • Received:2022-07-14 Revised:2022-08-15 Published:2026-03-03

摘要: 目的 对太原市某高效单晶电池项目化学有害因素所导致的职业健康风险进行评估,为该项目职业病危害风险管理提供技术依据。方法 2021年5—7月,对太原市某高效单晶电池项目进行职业卫生调查,运用工程分析法识别化学有害因素,采用GBZ/T 298—2017《工作场所化学有害因素职业健康风险评估技术导则》中推荐的半定量风险评估法进行风险评估。结果 属于高风险等级(4级)的岗位有2个,分别为贮运系统的氨贮运岗(氨)和磷烷贮运岗(磷化氢);属于中等风险等级(3级)的岗位有13个,分别为贮运系统的氢氟酸贮运岗(氟化氢)、氢氧化钠贮运岗(氢氧化钠)、盐酸贮运岗(盐酸)、特气贮运岗(三氯化硼和三氯氧磷)、笑气贮运岗(一氧化二氮),电池车间的制绒岗(氢氧化钠和氟化氢)、刻蚀岗(氟化氢)、离子注入岗(磷化氢)、退火岗(三氯氧磷)、清洗岗(氟化氢)、镀膜岗(氨和一氧化二氮)和辅助系统的酸性废气处理岗(氟化氢)、镀膜废气处理岗(氨和一氧化二氮);属于低风险等级(2级)的岗位有6个,分别为贮运系统双氧水贮运岗(过氧化氢)、硅烷贮运岗(四氢化硅)、综合贮运岗(导体浆料),电池车间的硼扩散岗(三氯化硼)、金属化岗(导体浆料)和辅助系统废水处理岗(氟及其化合物)。结论 该项目生产过程中存在的化学有害因素会对劳动者身体健康产生不良影响,其中需重点关注的岗位是贮运系统的氨贮运和磷烷贮运岗位,职业病危害风险管理应根据不同的风险水平采取相应的风险控制措施。

关键词: 高效单晶硅, 隧穿氧化层钝化接触, 化学有害因素, 半定量风险评估, 职业健康

Abstract: Objective To evaluate theoccupational health risk caused by chemical harmful factors in a high-efficiency monocrystalline battery project in Taiyuan City,provide technical basis for occupational health risk management of the project. Methods From May to July 2021,the occupational health investigation was performed on a high-efficiency monocrystalline battery project in Taiyuan City. The engineering analysis method was used to identify the chemical hazardous factors. The risk assessment was carried out by suing the semi-quantitative risk assessment method recommended in the Technical guidelines for occupational health risk assessment of chemical harmful factors in the workplace(GBZ/T 298-2017). Results There were two high risk posts(level 4),which were the ammonia post(ammonia) and phosphorane post(phosphine) in the storage and transportation system. There were13medium risk posts(level 3),which were hydrofluoric acid post(hydrogen fluoride),sodium hydroxide post(sodium hydroxide),hydrochloric acid post(chlorhydricacid),special gas post(borontrifluorideand phosphorus oxychloride),laughing gas post(nitrous oxide)of the storage and transportation system,making fluff post(sodium hydroxideand hydrogen fluoride),etching post(hydrogen fluoride),ion implantation post(phosphine),annealing post(phosphorus oxychloride),cleaning post(hydrogen fluoride),coating post(ammoniaand nitrous oxide) of the battery workshop,and waste gas treatment post(hydrogen fluoride),coating gas treatment post(ammonia and nitrous oxide) of the auxiliary system. There were six low risk posts(level 2),which were hydrogen peroxide post(hydrogenperoxide),silane post(silicontetrahydride),comprehensive post(conductive paste) of the storage and transportation system,boron diffusion post(boron trifluoride),metallization post(conductive paste)of the battery workshop,and waste water treatment post(fluoridesand compounds) of auxiliary system. Conclusion The chemical harmful factors existing in the production process of the project may have adverse effects on the physical health of the workers,the attention should be paid to ammonia post and phosphorane post in the storage and transportation system,and corresponding control measures should be taken according to different risk levels in the management.

Key words: High-efficiency monocrystalline, Tunnel oxide passivating contacts, Chemical harmful factors, Semi-quantitative risk assessment, Occupational health

中图分类号: