职业与健康 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (11): 1441-1445.

• 论著 •    下一篇

大连市水泥制造企业粉尘岗位职业健康风险评估中3种风险评估方法的应用研究

邵小翠, 王艳艳, 刘双   

  1. 大连市疾病预防控制中心职业放射卫生科,辽宁 大连 116033
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-05 修回日期:2024-12-16 发布日期:2025-12-12
  • 作者简介:邵小翠,女,副主任医师,主要从事职业卫生工作。
  • 基金资助:
    大连市疾控中心预防医学科技攻关计划项目(DLCDC08)

Application of three risk assessment methods in occupational health risk assessment of dust operation posts in cement manufacturing enterprises in Dalian City

SHAO Xiaocui, WANG Yanyan, LIU Shuang   

  1. Department of Occupational Radiation Health, Dalian Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Dalian, Liaoning 116033, China
  • Received:2024-12-05 Revised:2024-12-16 Published:2025-12-12

摘要: 目的 运用3种风险评估方法对大连市水泥制造企业粉尘岗位进行职业健康风险评估,探讨不同风险评估方法在水泥行业粉尘岗位职业健康风险评估的适用性。方法 选取2019—2023年大连市7家生产工艺相似的水泥制造企业,运用半定量接触比值法、半定量综合指数法和国际采矿和金属委员会(International Council on Mining and Metals,ICMM)职业健康风险评估定量法开展各粉尘岗位的职业健康风险评估。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验对3种评估方法进行差异性检验,Spearman秩相关分析法进行相关性分析。结果 7家水泥制造企业共检测粉尘岗位35个,采集粉尘样品194个,检测结果显示,粉尘岗位存在石灰石粉尘、矽尘、煤尘和水泥粉尘,总粉尘浓度为0.70~21.13 mg/m3,呼吸性粉尘为0.37~11.60 mg/m3。运用半定量接触比值法和半定量综合指数法,各岗位总粉尘和呼吸性粉尘的职业健康风险等级差异无统计学意义(P>0.01)。3种风险评估方法评估结果相互间差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01),3种风险评估方法的评估结果均呈正相关(均P<0.01),其中半定量接触比值法和半定量综合指数法相关性最高。结论 运用半定量接触比值法和半定量综合指数法,各岗位总粉尘和呼吸性粉尘的职业健康风险等级一致性较好,3种风险评估方法中的半定量综合指数法评估结果最高,ICMM定量法最低。对于粉尘浓度不高且接触时间较短的粉尘岗位,半定量综合指数法更符合实际,对于接触时间较短但粉尘浓度较高岗位,运用ICMM定量法较为合适。

关键词: 水泥制造企业, 粉尘, 风险评估

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the occupational health risks of dust operation posts in cement manufacturing enterprises in Dalian using three risk assessment methods,and to explore the applicability of different risk assessment methods for occupational health risk assessment of dust operation posts in the cement industry. Methods Seven cement manufacturing enterprises in Dalian with similar production processes were selected from 2019 to 2023. The semi-quantitative contact ratio method,semi-quantitative comprehensive index method,and International Council on Mining and Metals(ICMM) occupational health risk assessment quantitative method were employed to evaluate the occupational health risks of dust operation posts. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test for differences among three evaluation methods,and Spearman rank correlation analysis was used for correlation analysis. Results A total of 35 dust operation posts and 194 dust samples were collected from the seven cement manufacturing enterprises. The test results indicated that the presence of limestone dust,silica dust,coal dust,and cement dust in the dust operation posts. The total dust concentration was 0.70-21.13 mg/m3,and respirable dust concentration was 0.37-11.60 mg/m3. No statistical differences were found in the occupational health risk levels of total dust and respirable dust among different positions between the semi-quantitative contact ratio method and the semi-quantitative comprehensive index method(P>0.01). There were statistically significant differences among the results of the three risk assessment methods(P<0.01). The evaluation results of the three risk assessment methods were positively correlated(P<0.01),with the highest correlation between the semi-quantitative contact ratio method and the semi-quantitative comprehensive index method. Conclusion The semi-quantitative contact ratio method and the semi-quantitative comprehensive index method shows good consistency in assessing the occupational health risks of total dust and respirable dust in various positions. Among the three risk assessment methods,the semi-quantitative composite index method has the highest evaluation results,while the ICMM quantitative method has the lowest results. For dust operation posts with low dust concentrations and shorter exposure time,the semi-quantitative comprehensive index method is more applicable. For dust operation posts with higher dust concentrations but shorter exposure time,the ICMM quantitative method is more suitable.

Key words: Cement manufacturing enterprises, Dust, Risk assessment