职业与健康 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (14): 1990-1996.

• 卫生管理与研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于德尔菲法和层次分析法构建重大活动医疗应急保障工作能力评价指标体系的研究

田恺1, 李连崇2, 金鑫2, 刘先夺2, 邵林静1()   

  1. 1 天津市保健事务中心天津 300070
    2 天津市卫生健康委员会天津 300070
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-18 修回日期:2026-01-23 出版日期:2026-07-15 发布日期:2026-07-16
  • 通信作者: 邵林静,E-mail:shaolinjing@126.com
  • 作者简介:田恺,男,助理研究员,主要从事卫生应急管理与保健医疗质量控制管理研究工作。

Research on the construction of an evaluation index system for medical emergency support capacity in major events based on the Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process

TIAN Kai1, LI Lianchong2, JIN Xin2, LIU Xianduo2, SHAO Linjing1()   

  1. 1 Tianjin Health Affairs CenterTianjin 300070, China
    2 Tianjin Municipal Health and Health CommissionTianjin 300070, China
  • Received:2025-11-18 Revised:2026-01-23 Online:2026-07-15 Published:2026-07-16
  • Contact: SHAO Linjin,E-mail:shaolinjing@126.com

摘要:

目的 构建科学、准确、有效的重大活动医疗应急保障工作能力评价指标体系,为合理评估并提高天津市各相关医疗机构重大活动医疗应急保障工作能力、全面推动我市医疗应急保障工作高质量发展提供参考。方法 基于文献检索分析、专家访谈和理论研究的基础上,初步拟定重大活动医疗应急保障工作能力评价指标体系,采用德尔菲法和层次分析法确定评价指标体系并计算权重。结果 2轮咨询专家积极程度、权威系数与意见协调程度较好,最终构建了重大活动医疗应急保障工作能力评价指标体系,包括一级指标7个,组织管理、队伍管理、物资管理、财务管理、任务管理、院内救治保障管理、满意度管理,二级指标23个,如组织体系建立、医疗专家库建立、建立和更新物资台账等,三级指标53个,如明确各项管理工作制度、人员职责和工作流程;按照“平急结合、专兼结合”的原则,组建大、中、小型不同规模的专业医疗应急保障队伍;及时为本单位医疗应急保障队伍配备、更新必要的仪器设备,备齐备足必要的药品和耗材等。结论 本研究构建的重大活动医疗应急保障工作能力评价指标体系层次分明、权重合理,具有较高的可信度,可作为重大活动医疗应急保障工作能力评估、管理与决策的的有效工具。

关键词: 重大活动, 医疗应急保障工作能力, 评价指标, 体系, 德尔菲法, 层次分析法

Abstract:

Objective To establish a scientific,accurate and effective evaluation index system for medical-emergency support capacity during major events,so as to provide a reference for rationally assessing and improving the capacity of relevant medical institutions in Tianjin,and for comprehensively promoting the high-quality development of medical-emergency support in the city. Methods On the basis of literature retrieval and analysis,expert interviews and theoretical research,a draft evaluation index system for medical-emergency support capacity in major events was preliminarily formulated. The Delphi method and the analytic hierarchy process(AHP) were applied to finalize the index system and calculate the weights. Results The two rounds of expert consultation showed high positive response,authority coefficient and coordination of opinions. The final evaluation index system for medical-emergency support capacity during major events comprised 7 first-level indicators,including organization management,team management,material management,financial management,mission management,in-hospital treatment-support management and satisfaction management,23 second-level indicators,such as establishment of organizational system,establishment of medical expert database,creation and updating of material ledgers,etc.,and 53 third-level indicators,such as clarifying management rules,personnel responsibilities and work procedures; forming large-,medium- and small-scale professional medical-emergency support teams under the principle of "combining peacetime with emergency,full-time with part-time"; timely equipping and updating necessary instruments,medicines and consumables for the teams,etc.. Conclusion The constructed evaluation index system is well-structured and reasonably weighted,with high reliability,and can serve as an effective tool for assessing,managing and decision-making regarding medical-emergency support capacity in major events.

Key words: Major events, Medical-emergency support capacity, Evaluation index, System, Delphi method, Analytic hierarchy process

中图分类号: