职业与健康 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (15): 2132-2140.

• 论著—文献分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

2015—2025年深圳市、区、街道三级疾病预防控制机构科研论文发表情况分析

赵梦蓝, 蔡立芳, 林松兴, 刘昕怡, 杨梅, 段利娜()   

  1. 深圳市福田区疾病预防控制中心广东 深圳 518040
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-11 修回日期:2025-09-22 出版日期:2026-08-01 发布日期:2026-07-16
  • 通信作者: 段利娜
  • 作者简介:赵梦蓝,女,主管医师,主要从事卫生应急管理工作。
  • 基金资助:
    深圳市福田区卫生公益性科研项目(FTWS006)

Analysis of research publications from three-tier disease prevention and control institutions at the municipal,district,and subdistrict levels in Shenzhen from 2015 to 2025

ZHAO Menglan, CAI Lifang, LIN Songxing, LIU Xinyi, YANG Mei, DUAN Lina()   

  1. Shenzhen Futian District Center for Disease Control and PreventionShenzhenGuangdong 518040, China
  • Received:2025-04-11 Revised:2025-09-22 Online:2026-08-01 Published:2026-07-16
  • Contact: DUAN Lina
  • About author:DUAN Lina,E-mail:56631019@qq.com

摘要:

目的 分析深圳市三级疾病预防控制(疾控)机构科研论文发表现状与趋势,为促进城市疾控体系学术协同发展提供参考。方法 采用文献计量学与可视化方法检索2015年1月—2025年3月中国知网、万方及Web of Science数据库中深圳市、区、街道三级疾控机构为作者单位的期刊论文,分析发文量、论文质量、核心作者及研究热点。结果 三级机构共发表论文3 651篇,其中以第1单位发表2 085篇。深圳市疾控中心作为第1单位发文量最高,613篇,占比29.4%;区级机构平均99.0篇/家,街道级平均18.2篇/家。中文论文年发文量整体下降,英文论文数量平稳。国际核心及北大核心期刊论文占比呈上升趋势,所有机构国际核心及北大核心期刊论文占比41.8%,市级机构占65.7%,高于区级的37.0%和街道级的17.2%。中文核心作者主要来自区疾控中心,占80.0%;英文核心作者均来自市疾控中心,占100.0%。研究热点分层显著,区与街道级侧重疾病监测与流行病学实践,市级聚焦环境毒理与分子生物学机制研究。结论 深圳市疾控系统科研呈现“市级主导、区级潜力、街道薄弱”的分层格局,建议通过强化基层科研能力、加强内外部合作交流、完善现场科室与实验室合作机制,推动协同创新。

关键词: 疾病预防控制中心, 文献计量分析, 可视化分析, 研究热点, 科研管理

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the current status and trends of scientific research publications from three-tier Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC) in Shenzhen,providing reference for promoting academic collaborative development within the urban CDC system. Methods Bibliometrics and visualization methods were used to search for journal articles authored by municipal-,district-,and subdistrict-level CDC in Shenzhen from January 2015 to March 2025 in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang,and Web of Science databases. Publication volume,paper quality,core authors,and research hotspots were analyzed. Results A total of 3 651 papers were published by three-tier CDC,with 2 085 as first-author affiliations. The Shenzhen CDC had the highest output as the first-author institution(613 papers,29.4%),district-level institutions averaged 99.0 papers per unit,and subdistrict-level institutions averaged 18.2 papers. Annual Chinese-papers declined overall,while English-papers remained stable. The proportion of papers in internationally indexed core journals and Peking University Core indexed increased,accounting for 41.8% of all publications. Municipal institutions had higher proportions(65.7%) compared to district-level(37.0%) and subdistrict-level(17.2%). Core Chinese-language authors were predominantly from district CDC(80.0%),while English-language core authors concentrated at the municipal CDC(100.0%). Research hotspots exhibited stratification:district and subdistrict institutions focused on disease surveillance and epidemiological practices,while municipal-level research emphasized environmental toxicology and molecular biological mechanisms. Conclusion Shenzhen's CDC system exhibits a hierarchical pattern of "municipal dominance,district potential,and subdistrict weakness" in research output. To foster collaborative innovation,we recommend enhancing grassroots research capacity,strengthening internal and external collaborations,and refining collaboration mechanisms between field departments and laboratories.

Key words: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Bibliometric analysis, Visualization analysis, Research hotspots, Scientific research management

中图分类号: