职业与健康 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5): 582-586.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

4种风险评估法在采矿业矽尘职业健康风险评估中的应用

李勇, 周丹, 张宏, 陈浩, 杨冰   

  1. 达州市疾病预防控制中心,四川 达州 635000
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-29 修回日期:2025-07-21 出版日期:2026-03-01 发布日期:2026-03-10
  • 作者简介:李勇,男,主任医师,主要从事职业卫生检测评价工作。

Application of four risk assessment methods in occupational health risk assessment of silica dust in mining industry

LI Yong, ZHOU Dan, ZHANG Hong, CHEN Hao, YANG Bing   

  1. Dazhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Dazhou,Sichuan 635000,China
  • Received:2025-06-29 Revised:2025-07-21 Online:2026-03-01 Published:2026-03-10

摘要:

目的 探讨4种风险评估方法在采矿企业矽尘职业健康风险评估中的适用性,为优化采矿业职业卫生管理提供依据。方法 2024年5—12月,以达州市18家采矿企业7类矽尘作业岗位为研究对象开展粉尘浓度检测,运用改良的粉尘作业分级法、半定量接触比值法、职业危害风险指数法和改良的国际采矿和金属委员会(International Council on Mining and Metals,ICMM)定量评估法,开展职业健康风险评估,并对各种方法评估结果进行一致性检验,对评估结果与接触浓度(E)/职业接触限值(occupational exposure limits,OEL)进行相关性分析。结果 7类岗位(掘进工、筛分工、破碎工、切割工、打眼工、装载工和运输工)矽尘时间加权平均接触浓度(exposure concentration of time weighted average,CTWA)最高值为2.69、0.37、0.65、 0.69、0.57、2.02和2.79 mg/m3,掘进、装载、运输工矽尘危害职业健康风险水平较高。4种评估方法结果与E/OEL的相关性均极强,其中,改良粉尘作业分级法、半定量接触比值法、职业危害风险指数法和改良ICMM法评估结果与E/OEL的相关性分别为rs=0.866、0.926、0.898和0.926(均P<0.05)。各种评估方法结果不完全一致,其中,改良的粉尘作业指数法评估结果偏低保守,结果无高风险岗位;半定量接触比值法整体偏高,结果无低风险岗位;职业危害风险指数法与改良的ICMM定量评估法较为符合采矿业矽尘作业实际情况,两者的一致性较强(Kappa=0.641,P<0.05)。结论 掘进、装载、运输工存在较高的职业健康风险。职业危害风险指数法与改良的ICMM定量评估法在采矿业矽尘职业健康风险评估中有较好的适用性。

关键词: 采矿企业, 矽尘暴露, 职业健康, 风险评估, 适用性

Abstract:

Objective To explore the applicability of four risk assessment methods in the occupational health risk assessment of silica dust in mining enterprises,and to provide basis for optimizing occupational health management in mining industry. Methods From May to December 2024,dust concentration testing was conducted targeting 7 types of silica dust operation posts across 18 mining enterprises in Dazhou City,the modified dust operation classification method,semi-quantitative exposure ratio method,occupational hazard risk index method,and the modified International Council on Mining and Metals(ICMM) quantitative assessment method were used to conduct occupational health risk assessment. The consistency of the assessment results of various methods was tested,and the correlation between the assessment results and E/OEL was analyzed. Results The highest exposure concentration of time weighted average(CTWA) of silica dust in seven types of positions(tunneling,screening,crushing,cutting,drilling,loading, and transportation) was 2.69,0.37,0.65,0.69,0.57,2.02,and 2.79 mg/m3,respectively,and the occupational health risk level of silica dust hazards to tunneling,loading and transportation workers was relatively high. The correlations between the results of the four assessment methods and E/OEL were all extremely strong. Among them,the correlations between the assessment results of the modified dust operation classification method,semi-quantitative exposure ratio method,occupational hazard risk index method,and modified ICMM method and E/OEL were rs=0.866,0.926,0.898,and 0.926,respectively(all P<0.05). The results of various evaluation methods were not completely consistent. Among them,the assessment results of the modified dust operation index method was relatively low and conservative,and there were no high-risk positions in the result. The semi-quantitative contact ratio method was overall on the high side,and as a result,there were no low-risk positions. The occupational hazard risk index method and the modified ICMM quantitative assessment method were more in line with the actual situation of silica dust operations in the mining industry,and the consistency between the two was relatively strong(Kappa=0.641,P<0.05). Conclusion Tunneling,loading and transportation workers have relatively high occupational health risks. The occupational hazard risk index method and the modified ICMM quantitative assessment method have good applicability in the occupational health risk assessment of silica dust in the mining industry.

Key words: Mining enterprise, Silica dust exposure, Occupational health, Risk assessment, Application

中图分类号: