职业与健康 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 233-237.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

网络团体心理干预对天津市某医院医护人员心理干预效果研究

孙丽丽1a, 郭晓夏1b, 司纪剑2, 李洪涛1b   

  1. 1.天津医科大学总医院空港医院 a临床心理科,b医务部,天津 300308;
    2.天津医科大学总医院临床心理科,天津 300052
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-14 修回日期:2024-05-28 出版日期:2025-01-15 发布日期:2025-12-11
  • 通信作者: 李洪涛,副研究员,E-mail:kgyylht@126.com
  • 作者简介:孙丽丽,女,副主任医师,主要从事心理健康工作。
  • 基金资助:
    天津医科大学2022年度医院管理创新研究项目(2022 YG08); 天津市医院协会医院管理研究项目(2022zz08)

Study on psychological intervention effect of network group psychological intervention on medical staff in a hospital in Tianjin

SUN Lili1a, GUO Xiaoxia1b, SI Jijian2, LI Hongtao1b   

  1. 1. a Department of Clinical Psychology, b Medical Administration Department, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin 300308, China;
    2. Department of Clinical Psychology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300052, China
  • Received:2024-05-14 Revised:2024-05-28 Online:2025-01-15 Published:2025-12-11
  • Contact: LI Hongtao,Associate researcher,E-mail:kgyylht@126.com

摘要: 目的 探索网络团体心理干预与心理健康教育对医护人员焦虑、抑郁及失眠严重程度的干预效果及3个月随访的效果。方法 选取2022年5—11月在天津市某医院参与医疗救治工作的医护人员109名,采用随机对照实验设计,随机分成综合干预组(网络团体心理干预联合心理健康教育)(n=53)和心理健康教育组(n=56),在干预前、干预结束后和干预结束后3个月分别采用焦虑自评量表(self-rating anxiety scale,SAS)、抑郁自评量表(self-rating depression scale,SDS)、失眠严重程度指数量表(insomnia severity index,ISI)评估干预效果。结果 两组医护人员在性别、年龄、婚姻状况、学历、职业类型、参与医疗救治工作的时间等基本资料比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。干预前综合干预组医护人员SAS得分为(41.46±10.38)分、SDS得分为(46.34±14.50)分、ISI得分为(7.62±5.12)分,与心理健康教育组的得分[(40.47±9.59)分、(45.29±11.60)分、(7.50±4.72)分]比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。干预结束后综合干预组医护人员SAS得分为(31.44±5.38)分、SDS得分为(33.96±7.55)分,明显低于心理健康教育组的得分[(35.47±7.88)和(39.44±11.88)分](均P<0.05);3个月随访时综合干预组医护人员SAS得分为(35.97±8.37)分、SDS得分为(38.56±10.58)分,仍明显低于心理健康教育组的得分[(39.91±11.89)和(43.50±14.29)分](均P<0.05);两组医护人员在干预结束后的焦虑、抑郁评分均明显低于干预前(均P<0.05),且综合干预组医护人员在3个月随访时的焦虑、抑郁评分仍明显低于干预前(均P<0.05)。综合干预组医护人员干预结束后ISI得分为(5.70±3.70)分,明显低于干预前(P<0.05),且明显低于心理健康教育组的得分[(7.21±3.94)分](P<0.05),但3个月随访时的ISI得分为(6.19±3.86)分,与干预前的得分[(7.62±5.12)分]比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);心理健康教育组医护人员的ISI得分在干预结束后和3个月随访时较干预前比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 网络团体心理干预联合心理健康教育能有效改善医护人员的焦虑、抑郁和失眠情况,效果优于单纯心理健康教育。

关键词: 医护人员, 焦虑, 抑郁, 失眠, 网络团体心理干预, 心理健康教育

Abstract: Objective To explore the effect of network group psychological intervention and mental health education on the anxiety,depression and insomnia severity of medical staff and the effect of 3-month follow-up. Methods From May to November 2022,a total of 109 medical staff who participated in medical treatment work in a hospital in Tianjin were selected and randomly divided into comprehensive intervention group(network group psychological intervention combined with mental health education,n=53) and mental health education group(n=56) by a randomized controlled experiment design. Self-rating anxiety scale(SAS),self-rating depression scale(SDS) and insomnia severity index(ISI) were used to evaluated before,after the intervention and at 3-month follow-up. Results There were no statistically significant differences in gender,age,marital status,education background,occupation type and time of participating in medical treatment work between the two groups of medical staff(all P>0.05). Before the intervention,the scores of SAS[(41.46±10.38)points],SDS[(46.34±14.50)points] and ISI[(7.62±5.12)points] in the comprehensive intervention group were not statistically significantly different from those in the mental health education group [(40.47±9.59),(45.29±11.60),and (7.50±4.72)points](all P>0.05). After the intervention,the scores of SAS[(31.44±5.38)points] and SDS[(33.96±7.55)points] in the comprehensive intervention group were significantly lower than those in the mental health education group[(35.47±7.88),(39.44±11.88)points](both P<0.05). At 3-month follow-up,the scores of SAS[(35.97±8.37)points] and SDS[(38.56±10.58)points] in the comprehensive intervention group were still significantly lower than those in the mental health education group[(39.91±11.89) and (43.50±14.29)points](both P<0.05). The scores of anxiety and depression after the intervention were significantly lower than before the intervention in the two groups(both P<0.05),and the scores of anxiety and depression in the comprehensive intervention group at 3 months follow-up were still significantly lower than before the intervention(both P<0.05). The score of ISI among medical staff in the comprehensive intervention group after the intervention was (5.70±3.70)points,significantly lower than before the intervention(P<0.05),and significantly lower than the score of the mental health education group[(7.21±3.94)points](P<0.05). However,the ISI score at the 3 month follow-up was (6.19±3.86)points,and there was no statistically significant difference compared with the score of before the intervention[(7.62±5.12)points](P>0.05). The ISI scores of medical staff in the mental health education group showed no statistically significant difference after the intervention and at 3 month follow-up compared to before the intervention(both P>0.05). Conclusion Network group psychological intervention combined with mental health education can effectively improve the anxiety,depression and insomnia of medical staff,and the effect is better than simple mental health education alone.

Key words: Medical staff, Anxiety, Depression, Insomnia, Network group psychological intervention, Mental health education

中图分类号: