海军某批亚丁湾护航舰艇官兵人格特征及应对方式的相关分析

职业与健康 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 1479-1483.

海军某批亚丁湾护航舰艇官兵人格特征及应对方式的相关分析

田宜禾^1,2, 吴菁¹, 张蕾¹, 杨婕¹, 燕宏丽¹, 储静¹

1.海军军医大学护理系人文护理学教研室,上海 200433;
2.中国人民武装警察部队海警总队医院外一科,浙江嘉兴 314001

收稿日期:2022-12-19 修回日期:2023-02-06 发布日期:2026-03-15
通信作者: 储静,教授,E-mail：chujing1999@smmu.edu.cn
作者简介:田宜禾,女,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为护理心理。
基金资助:
军委后勤保障部卫勤保障能力创新与生成专项重大课题（20WQ010）; 军委后勤保障部卫生局保健课题面上项目（22BJZ09）

Analysis on correlation between personality traits and coping styles of navy soldiers on Gulf of Aden escort

TIAN Yi-he^1,2, WU Jing¹, ZHANG Lei¹, YANG Jie¹, YAN Hong-li¹, CHU Jing¹

1. Humanities Nursing Teaching and Research Section,Department of Nursing,Naval Medical University,Shanghai 200433,China;
2. First Surgery Department,Marine Police Corps Hospital,Chinese People's Armed Police Force,Jiaxing Zhejiang 314001,China

Received:2022-12-19 Revised:2023-02-06 Published:2026-03-15
Contact: CHU Jing,Professor,E-mail：chujing1999@smmu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨某批亚丁湾护航舰艇官兵的人格特征和应对方式的相关性。方法 2021年6月采用艾森克人格问卷简式量表中国版（Eysenck personality questionnaire-r short scale Chinese,EPQ-RSC）和应对方式评定量表（coping style questionnaire,CSQ）对刚参加完某批亚丁湾护航任务的某驱逐舰上的157名舰艇官兵进行问卷调查,并对数据进行分析。结果应对方式各因子中,舰艇官兵解决问题和求助得分显著高于中国军人常模,自责、幻想、退避和合理化因子得分显著低于中国军人常模（均P<0.01）。人格特征中神经质维度与应对方式各维度得分两两显著相关,外-内倾维度与应对方式中解决问题、求助、自责维度得分两两相关,精神质维度与应对方式中解决问题、求助维度得分两两显著相关,掩饰维度与应对方式中自责、幻想、退避、合理化维度得分两两相关（均P<0.05）。回归分析结果显示,舰艇官兵人格特征是其应对方式的重要影响因素。官兵精神质水平正向显著预测合理化应对（β=18.050,P<0.01）,外-内倾水平正向预测解决问题应对（β=3.680,P<0.01）和求助应对（β=1.740,P<0.05）,而神经质水平正向显著预测自责应对（β=5.480,P<0.01）。结论护航舰艇官兵人格特征和应对方式呈显著相关,其中外倾人格官兵易于选择成熟型应对方式,精神质人格官兵更倾向于选择混合型应对方式,神经质人格官兵易于非成熟型应对方式。

关键词: 舰艇官兵, 长远航, 人格特征, 应对方式

Abstract: Objective To explore the correlation between personality traits and coping styles of navy soldiers onescort at the Gulf of Aden. Methods In June 2021,the Eysenck personality questionnaire-r short scale Chinese（EPQ-RSC） and the coping style questionnaire（CSQ） were used to perform a questionnaire survey on 157 navy soldiers from a troop,who had just participated in the Gulf of Aden escort. And the data were analyzed. Results Among the factors of coping style,the scores of problem solving and seekinghelp were significantly higher than the Chinese military norms（both P<0.01）,while the scores of self-accusation,fantasy, avoidance and rationalization were significantly lower than Chinese military norms（all P<0.01）. The neurotic dimension of personality traits was significantly correlated with the scores of dimensions of coping styles,the extroversion-introversion dimension was significantly correlated with the scores of the problem solving,seeking help and self-blame dimensions of coping styles,the psychic dimension was significantly correlated with the the scores of problem solving,seeking help dimensions of coping styles,and the lying dimension was significantly correlated with the scores of self-blame,fantasy,withdrawal and rationalization dimensions of coping styles（all P<0.05）. The regression analysis results showed that the personality traits of navy soldiers werethe important factor affecting their coping style. The psychoticism level of navy soldiers significantly positively predicted rationalized coping（β=18.050,P<0.01）,extroversion-introversion level positively predicted problem solving coping（β=3.680,P<0.01） and seeking help coping（β=1.740,P<0.05）,and neuroticism level significantly positively predicted self-blame coping（β=5.480,P<0.01）. Conclusion The personality traits and coping styles are highly correlated among the navy soldiers on the escort,those with higherextraversion levels are more likely to choose mature coping styles,those with higher psychoticism levels tend to choose mixed coping style,and those with higher neuroticism levels are prone to respond immaturely.

Key words: Naval soldiers, Long voyage, Personality traits, Coping styles

中图分类号:

R395.6

田宜禾, 吴菁, 张蕾, 杨婕, 燕宏丽, 储静. 海军某批亚丁湾护航舰艇官兵人格特征及应对方式的相关分析. [J]职业与健康, 2023, 39(11): 1479-1483.

TIAN Yi-he, WU Jing, ZHANG Lei, YANG Jie, YAN Hong-li, CHU Jing. Analysis on correlation between personality traits and coping styles of navy soldiers on Gulf of Aden escort. [J]OCCUPATION AND HEALTH, 2023, 39(11): 1479-1483.

参考文献

[1] 孔德华,吴菁,张蕾,等.长远航舰艇官兵心理健康维护的研究现状[J].解放军护理杂志,2019,36(2):77-80.
[2] 吴杲,程祺,许恒,等.某批亚丁湾护航官兵心理健康水平研究[J].海军医学杂志,2015,36(1):7-9.
[3] 肖春红,刘妮,柴培俊.新冠肺炎疫情期间系统心理干预对长远航官兵心理健康的影响[J].海军医学杂志,2021,42(6):688-691.
[4] 周锡芳,薛蓓蕾,王杨,等.远航前护航舰队官兵应对方式与人格特征的相关性[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2015,23(11):1651-1654.
[5] 屠志浩,彭丽,沈兴华.长远航前后海军官兵心理健康对照研究的Meta分析[J].人民军医,2018,61(6):487-492.
[6] 张帆,刘伟志.我国海军官兵心理健康研究:2009—2019[J].第二军医大学学报,2020,41(9):1031-1036.
[7] SU H,CAO J,ZHOU Y,et al.The mediating effect of coping style on personality and mental health among elderly Chinese empty-nester:A cross-sectional study[J].Arch Gerontol Geriatr,2018,75:197-201.
[8] 钱铭怡,武国城,朱荣春,等.艾森克人格问卷简式量表中国版(EPQ-RSC)的修订[J].心理学报,2000,32(3):317-323.
[9] HUANG I C,LEE J L,KETHEESWARAN P,et al.Does personality affect health-related quality of life? A systematic review[J].PLoS One,2017,12(3):e0173806.
[10] LIPOWSKI M,LIPOWSKA M,PEPLINSKA A,et al.Personality determinants of health behaviours of merchant navy officers[J].Int Marit Health,2014,65(3):158-165.
[11] 郭刚军,马慧.大学生抑郁情绪与人格的关系:应对方式的中介和调节效应[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2022,30(3):426-431.
[12] FOLKMAN S.Stress,coping,and hope[J].Psychooncology,2010,19(9):901-908.
[13] LAI H L,CHEN C I,LU C Y,et al.elationships among personality,coping,and concurrent health-related quality of life in women with breast cancer[J].Breast Cancer,2019,26(5):544-551.
[14] KWIATOSZ-MUC M,FIJALKOWSKA-NESTOROWICZ A,FIJALKOWSKA M,et al.Stress coping styles among anaesthesiology and intensive care unit personnel-links to the work environment and personal characteristics:A multicentre survey study[J].Scand J Caring Sci,2019,33(3):661-668.
[15] 王晓燕,汪微,吴海清,等.执行远洋护航任务官兵心身状况及与应对方式的关系[J].实用预防医学,2017,24(1):82-84.
[16] 汪向东,王希林,马弘,等.心理卫生评定量表手册[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999:109-115,122-126.
[17] 冯正直,夏本立,杨国愉,等.军人应对方式量表的常模及结果分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2006,20(10):667-670.
[18] 易淑媛,张新华,罗成宜,等.肺结核患者人格特征与应对方式的相关性研究[J].中国健康教育,2020,36(1):66-70.
[19] 杨玲玲,张西正,时慧琦,等.长远航对舰艇人员健康的影响及对策分析[J].海军医学杂志,2017,38(3):203-206.
[20] 李云波,郭静利,田阳,等.导弹部队官兵心理应激与人格特征、应付方式的关系[J].职业与健康,2017,33(21):2931-2934.
[21] 胡昌奇,吴婧,朱娅丽.心理干预对部队官兵心理健康影响分析[J].心理月刊,2021,16(18):39-40.
[22] 田宜禾,吴菁,张蕾,等.自我表露团体干预疗法国内外研究进展及启示[J].医学与哲学,2021,42(3):37-40,76.
[23] 孔德华,吴菁,张蕾,等.长远航舰船人员自我表露与心理健康水平的相关性[J].解放军护理杂志,2019,36(5):77-80.
[24] MADDI S R,KAHN S,MADDI K L.The effectiveness of hardiness training[J].Consult Psychol J,1998,50(2):78-86.
[25] 高秋平,任杭,赵光,等.积极心理干预对军队疗养官兵负性情绪及应对方式的影响[J].华南国防医学志,2019,33(9):629-632.