北京市某区职业性尘肺病患者现状调查

职业与健康 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 609-612.

北京市某区职业性尘肺病患者现状调查

胡洁, 胡在方, 周国伟, 张丽, 甄国新

北京市顺义区疾病预防控制中心职业与放射卫生科,北京 101300

收稿日期:2023-03-21 修回日期:2023-04-17 发布日期:2026-03-16
作者简介:胡洁,女,主治医师,主要从事职业卫生相关工作。
基金资助:
北京市重点职业病监测与风险评估分支子项目（BJZW 2018-09）

Investigation on status of patients with occupational pneumoconiosis in a district of Beijing City

HU Jie, HU Zaifang, ZHOU Guowei, ZHANG Li, ZHEN Guoxin

Institute of Occupational and Radiological Health,Shunyi Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Beijing,101300, China

Received:2023-03-21 Revised:2023-04-17 Published:2026-03-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的了解北京市某区职业性尘肺病患者的现状,为政府等相关部门制定尘肺病保障及救治政策提供参考依据。方法将2001—2020年北京市某区报告的全部职业性尘肺病患者作为调查对象,采取电话随访的方式,对尘肺病患者年龄、性别、地区、尘肺期别、类型、病种、诊断年龄、接尘工龄、行业、企业规模、经济类型、社会保障和并发症情况等进行描述分析。结果截至2020年底,某区累计报告职业性尘肺病132例,其中尘肺壹期54例（40.91%）,贰期36例（27.27%）,叁期42例（31.82%）,尘肺病病种分布以矽肺（112例,84.85%）为主。不同期别患者性别间差异有统计学意义（χ²=6.217,P<0.05）,不同期别患者接尘工龄和诊断年龄差异均无统计学意义（均P>0.05）。132例尘肺病患者,实际随访130例,随访率为98.48%,其中存活112例（84.85%）,死亡18例（13.64%）;性别以女性（89例,67.42%）为主;尘肺病病种分布以矽肺（112例,84.85%）为主;接尘工龄M（P₂₅,P₇₅）为12（8,16）年,诊断年龄为（52.43±10.67）岁。存活患者年龄分布以45~<55岁年龄组（47例,41.96%）最多,接尘工龄主要集中在5~20年（96例,85.71%）,诊断年龄主要集中在40~<50和50~<60岁两个年龄段;111例存活尘肺病患者均至少落实了1项社会保障措施,主要为城乡居民基本医疗保险109例（97.32%）,工伤保险30例（26.79%）。结论北京市某区尘肺病仍存在较高的续发风险,应切实做好源头管控和善后处置工作,持续加强尘肺病防治工作力度。

关键词: 职业性尘肺病, 矽肺, 社会保障

Abstract: Objective To understand the current situation of occupational pneumoconiosis patients in a district of Beijing City,provide scientific basis for the government and other departments to formulate pneumoconiosis protection and treatment policies. Methods All occupational pneumoconiosis patients reported in a district of Beijing City from 2001 to 2020 were selected,telephone follow-up was conducted to collect information. The descriptive analysis was performed on the age,gender,region,stage and type of pneumoconiosis,age of diagnosis,working years,industry,enterprise size,economic type,social security and comorbidities. Results By the end of 2020,a total of 132 cases were reported in a district of Beijing,including 54 cases（40.91%） of phage Ⅰ,36 cases（27.27%） of phage Ⅱ,and 42 cases（31.82%） of phage Ⅲ,silicosis（112 cases,84.85%） was the predominant. There was a statistically significant difference in stage between the genders（χ²=6.217,P<0.05）,and there was no significant difference in the age of exposure to dust and the age at diagnosis among the patients at different stages（P>0.05）. Among 132 pneumoconiosis patients,130 cases were actually followed up,with the follow up rate of 98.48%,of which 112 cases（84.85%） survived and 18 cases（13.64%） died. Most of cases were female（89 cases,67.42%） and silicosis was the dominant type of pneumoconiosis（112 cases,84.85%）. The median length of exposure[M（P₂₅,P₇₅）] was 12（8,16） years. The average age of diagnosis was （52.43±10.67）years old. 41.96%（47 cases） of survival cases were in the age group of 45-<55,96 cases（85.71%） were exposed to dust for 5-20 years,the age of diagnosis was mainly concentrated in 40-<50 years old and 50-<60 years old. Totally 111 survived cases had at least one social security,which were the basic medical insurance for urban and rural residents（109 cases,97.32%） and occupational injury insurance（30 cases,26.79%）. Conclusion The risk of occupational pneumoconiosis is still high in a district of Beijing City,and it is necessary to effectively control the source and deal with the aftermath,and continue to strengthen the prevention and control of pneumoconiosis.

Key words: Occupational pneumoconiosis, Silicosis, Social security

中图分类号:

R135.2

胡洁, 胡在方, 周国伟, 张丽, 甄国新. 北京市某区职业性尘肺病患者现状调查. [J]职业与健康, 2024, 40(5): 609-612.

HU Jie, HU Zaifang, ZHOU Guowei, ZHANG Li, ZHEN Guoxin. Investigation on status of patients with occupational pneumoconiosis in a district of Beijing City. [J]OCCUPATION AND HEALTH, 2024, 40(5): 609-612.

参考文献

[1] 张雁林,赵建,赵怡然,等.细胞外组蛋白在煤工尘肺发病中的作用[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2020,38(8):566-569.
[2] 李涛. 新时期职业病防治形势分析及对策建议[J].中国职业医学,2018,45(5):537-542.
[3] 国家卫生健康委宣传司.国家卫生健康委员会2022年4月25日新闻发布会文字实录[EB/OL].(2022-04-25)[2022-06-16].http://www.nhc.gov.cn/xcs/s3574/202204/2fbf355668df4fd0ade8b5c3cf455f95.shtml.
[4] 胡在方,周国伟,张丽,等.北京市顺义区新发职业性尘肺病流行病学特征[J].职业与健康,2021,37(18):2563-2567.
[5] 国家统计局.2017年国民经济行业分类:GB/T 4754—2017[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017:21-34.
[6] 国家统计局.关于划分企业登记注册类型的规定[EB/OL].(2011-09-26)[2022-06-16].http://www.stats.gov.cn/xxgk/tjbz/gjtjbz/201310/t20131031_1758907.html.
[7] 国家统计局.统计上大中小微型企业划分办法(2017)[EB/OL].(2017-12-18)[2022-06-16].http://www.stats.gov.cn/xxgk/tjbz/gjtjbz/202008/t20200811_1782335.html.
[8] 王海涛,杨荔,苏亚娇,等.2009—2018年中国职业病发病规律及特征[J].职业卫生与应急救援,2020,38(2):178-181.
[9] 谢丽庄,周琅,赵圆,等.江苏省尘肺病患者随访与回顾性调查研究[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2020,38(4):251-255.
[10] 金蕾,唐天统.1949—2019年海南省职业性尘肺病患者回顾性调查[J].中国预防医学杂志,2021,22(12):946-951.
[11] 唐艳红,邢漪,李亚娟.2009—2018年云南省职业性尘肺病现状及保障调查[J].职业卫生与应急救援,2020,38(6):638-642.
[12] 瞿菁,刘美霞,窦婷婷,等.1949—2019年上海市职业性尘肺病回顾性调查分析[J].中国工业医学杂志,2021,34(4):301-305.
[13] 李征,房云,李海月,等.2010—2016年北京市职业病发病情况[J].首都公共卫生,2018,12(4):175-177.
[14] 张丽,胡在方,胡洁,等.2004—2017年北京市某区职业病发病情况及趋势分析[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2019,37(1):46-49.
[15] 庄家毅,辛全兵,时晓梦.1949—2019年连云港市尘肺病患者随访和回顾性调查[J].职业与健康,2021,37(17):2417-2419.
[16] 邹华,方兴林,陈苘,等.2006至2009年浙江省尘肺发病分析[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2011,29(5):358-360.
[17] 曹伟. 芜湖市尘肺病回顾性调查[J].职业与健康,2021,37(17),2305-2312.
[18] 乔雪梅,王书超,宋静.商丘市尘肺病随访与回顾性调查情况分析[J].实用预防医学,2022,29(2):185-188.
[19] 杨群,徐东,袁义昌,等.潍坊市尘肺病患者随访与回顾性调查[J].预防医学论坛,2022,28(4):241-244,273.
[20] 许丹,严茂胜,曹献磅,等.1964—2019年广州市黄埔区尘肺病患者随访调查[J].职业与健康,2021,37(6):739-743.
[21] 李颖,张晓华,罗光明,等.职业性尘肺病患者并发症临床分析[J].中国职业医学,2019,46(1):75-77.
[22] 王龙义,李姣,金蕾,等.海南省30年尘肺病发病特征分析[J].中国工业医学杂志,2020,33(2):160-163.
[23] 石蕊,安金英,孙志谦.尘肺患者合并COPD的相关危险因素分析[J].职业与健康,2021,37(10):1311-1314.
[24] 周军,扬怀宇,石江涛.104例尘肺死亡原因调查研究[J].四川解剖学杂志,2016,24(1):21-22.
[25] TRAULSEN L K,BAELUM J,HALLING A,et al.Risk factors for incident asthma and COPD in a cohort of young adults[J].Clin Respir J,2017,12(3):1021-1029.