职业与健康 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (14): 1952-1957.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

江门市某农村饮水安全工程卫生学评价

梁东兴, 李艳清, 李彦斌, 文美贞   

  1. 江门市疾病预防控制中心环境与学校卫生所,广东 江门 529000
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-03 修回日期:2024-11-18 出版日期:2025-07-15 发布日期:2025-12-12
  • 通信作者: 李艳清,副主任医师,E-mail:anniecow@qq.com
  • 作者简介:梁东兴,男,副主任医师,主要从事生活饮用水等环境卫生监测与评价工作。

Hygienic evaluation of a rural drinking water safety project in Jiangmen City

LIANG Dongxing, LI Yanqing, LI Yanbin, WEN Meizhen   

  1. Institute of Environmental and School Health,Jiangmen Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Jiangmen,Guangdong 529000,China
  • Received:2024-10-03 Revised:2024-11-18 Online:2025-07-15 Published:2025-12-12
  • Contact: LI Yanqing,Associate chief physician,E-mail:anniecow@qq.com

摘要: 目的 评估广东省江门市某宗流砂过滤工艺的农村饮水安全工程在设计、施工和运行管理等阶段的风险因素,并提出合理科学且可行性的卫生学建议。方法 2023年6—10月,通过资料查阅、现场调查、样品检测与组织专家会商等多种形式,对该工程供水全流程包括水源到用户端的工程设计、建设、运行管理和监测等各个环节开展评价,并提出有效的整改意见和建议。结果 该工程的水源和厂址的选择、厂区布局和管理情况、制水工艺、输水管网、调节构筑物和各类水质检验结果等基本符合供水单位卫生规范要求,抽检2021—2023年水源水、出厂水和末梢水检测,2021年10月水源水总磷和总氮检测值分别为0.05和0.76 mg/L,2022年10月总氮检测值为0.76 mg/L,均超过Ⅱ类地表水限值要求(总磷≤0.025 mg/L,总氮≤0.5 mg/L),其他指标均达标,暂无备用供水水源,厂区厕所蓄粪池距离生产构筑物<10 m,存在安全隐患。结论 该工程总体供水规模能满足实际需要,整体出厂水质良好,在水源水水质、常规指标检测能力和漏损率等方面存在一定的卫生学风险,建议加强水源防护巡检,尽快考虑备用水源,提升实验室的水质检测能力,加强供水管网的维护管理,确保工程供水安全。

关键词: 农村, 流砂过滤, 饮水安全工程, 卫生学评价

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the risk factors in the design,construction,and operation management stages of a rural drinking water safety project using a sand flow filtration process in Jiangmen City,Guangdong Province,and to propose reasonable,scientific,and feasible hygiene recommendations. Methods From June to October 2023,various forms such as data review,on-site investigation,sample testing,and expert consultation were conducted to evaluate the entire water supply process of the project,including engineering design,construction,operation management,and monitoring from the water source to the user end,and effective rectification opinions and suggestions were proposed. Results The selection of the water source and plant site,the layout and management of the plant area,the water production process,the water supply network,the regulating structures,and various water quality inspection results of the project basically met the hygiene standards of the water supply unit. From 2021 to 2023,the source water,factory water,and terminal water were sampled for testing. In October 2021,the total phosphorus and total nitrogen detection values of the source water were 0.05 and 0.76 mg/L,respectively,and in October 2022,the total nitrogen detection value was 0.76 mg/L,all exceeding the Class II surface water limit requirements(total phosphorus ≤0.025 mg/L,total nitrogen ≤0.5 mg/L). Other indicators met the standards,and there was currently no backup water supply source. The toilet septic tank in the plant area was less than 10 m away from the production structure,which posed a safety hazard. Conclusion The overall water supply scale of the project can meet practical needs,and the overall factory water quality is good. There are certain hygiene risks in terms of water quality,conventional indicator detection ability,and leakage rate of the source water. It is recommended to strengthen water source protection inspections,consider backup water sources as soon as possible,improve the laboratory's water quality detection ability,strengthen the maintenance and management of the water supply network,and ensure the safety of the engineering water supply.

Key words: Rural areas, Flowing sand filtration, Drinking water safety project, Hygiene evaluation.

中图分类号: