职业与健康 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (19): 2627-2632.

• 论著——职业卫生与职业相关疾病 • 上一篇    下一篇

北京市某主题公园职业病危害检测分析与对策研究

庞志强, 潘兴富(), 李龙宇, 张洪达   

  1. 北京市职业病防治院北京 100093
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-13 修回日期:2025-12-15 出版日期:2026-10-01 发布日期:2026-08-17
  • 通信作者: 潘兴富,E-mail:pxf323@163.com
  • 作者简介:庞志强,男,检测检验工程师,主要从事职业病危害因素检测工作。

Occupational disease hazards detection analysis and countermeasure research in a theme park in Beijing

PANG Zhiqiang, PAN Xingfu(), LI Longyu, ZHANG Hongda   

  1. Beijing Occupational Disease Prevention and Treatment InstituteBeijing 100093, China
  • Received:2025-11-13 Revised:2025-12-15 Online:2026-10-01 Published:2026-08-17
  • Contact: PAN Xingfu,E-mail:pxf323@163.com

摘要:

目的 对北京市某主题公园存在的职业病危害因素进行识别与调查,测定其接触水平,评估现有职业病防护设施的实际效果,并基于评估结果提出针对性的控制对策与改进建议。方法 2025年5月,通过现场调查和工程分析识别关键危害点,对作业人员接触职业病危害因素浓度/强度进行检测,最终对所有信息进行分析和评价。结果 该企业主要职业病危害因素有粉尘、臭氧、盐酸、异丙醇、丙酮、噪声、激光辐射及手传振动等。园艺部门技术员、造型师接触的噪声超标,其中技术员8 h等效声级为88.2 dB(A),作业分级为Ⅰ级(轻度危害);造型师8 h等效声级为94.4 dB(A),作业分级为Ⅱ级(中度危害);其余各岗位的粉尘浓度、毒物浓度、噪声声级等均符合职业接触限值要求。该企业的职业病防护设施、应急救援设施、个体防护用品配置及职业健康监护基本符合相关规范要求。结论 该企业的职业病危害因素种类较多,企业通过改造项目等方式降低人员接触量,通过轮岗等方式缩短作业时间降低人员接触频次及接触时间。企业为作业人员配备相应的防护用品,但仍需重点关注产生噪声危害的岗位。建议保持定期监测,确保防护设施的有效性和个人防护用品佩戴的正确性。

关键词: 主题公园, 职业病危害, 作业分级, 职业病防护措施, 噪声, 盐酸

Abstract:

Objective To identify and investigate occupational hazard factors present in a theme park in Beijing,measure their exposure levels,evaluate the effectiveness of existing occupational protection facilities,and propose targeted control measures and improvement recommendations based on the evaluation results. Methods In May 2025,key hazard points were identified through field surveys and engineering analysis. The concentrations/intensities of occupational hazard factors to which workers were exposed were monitored,and all collected information was systematically analyzed and evaluated. Results The main occupational hazards identified included dust,ozone,hydrochloric acid,isopropanol,acetone,noise,laser radiation,and hand-transmitted vibration. Noise exposure exceeded the permissible limits for the technician and model artist in the horticulture department,with 8-hour equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure levels(LEX,8 h) of 88.2 and 94.4 dB(A),corresponding to Grade I(low hazard) and Grade Ⅱ(moderate hazard) exposure classifications,respectively. Concentrations of dust and chemical toxicants,as well as noise levels at other positions,all complied with occupational exposure limits. The enterprise's occupational hazard protection facilities,emergency rescue equipment,allocation of personal protective equipment,and occupational health surveillance were generally in line with relevant regulatory requirements. Conclusion There are many types of occupational hazards in this enterprise. The enterprise reduces personnel exposure through engineering modifications and other means,shortens work time through job rotation to reduce frequency and duration of exposure,and provides workers with appropriate personal protective equipment,but close attention should be placed on positions with significant noise hazards. It is recommended to maintain regular monitoring and ensure both the effectiveness of protective facilities and the correct use of personal protective equipment.

Key words: Theme park, Occupational disease hazards, Exposure assessment rating, Occupational disease protection measures, Noise, Hydrochloric acid

中图分类号: