职业与健康 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 731-735.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同职业健康风险评估方法在地埋式污水处理厂的应用研究

范小猛1, 冯玉超1, 张海1, 苏艺伟1, 王致1, 林婧舒2   

  1. 1.广州市第十二人民医院职业环境与健康重点实验室,广东 广州 510620;
    2.广州市净水有限公司安环部,广东 广州 510655
  • 收稿日期:2024-06-18 修回日期:2024-07-08 出版日期:2025-03-15 发布日期:2025-12-16
  • 通信作者: 王致,主任医师,E-mail:zhi_wang@outlook.com;林婧舒,助理工程师,E-mail:42164502@qq.com
  • 作者简介:范小猛,男,高级工程师,主要从事职业卫生与应急救援工作。
  • 基金资助:
    广州市卫生健康科技项目(20221A011054); 广州市卫生健康科技项目(20221A010033); 广州市医学重点学科建设项目(2021—2023年); 广州市科学技术局重点研发计划项目(202206010061); 地埋式净(污)水厂职业健康风险控制研究项目—职业健康管理及大数据采集与分析评估(10432021000010); 广州市科技计划项目(2023A03J0497)

Application research of different occupational health risk assessment methods in buried sewage treatment plants

FAN Xiaomeng1, FENG Yuchao1, ZHANG Hai1, SU Yiwei1, WANG Zhi1, LIN Jingshu2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Occupational Environment and Health,Guangzhou Twelfth People's Hospital,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510620,China;
    2. Safety and Environment Department,Guangzhou Water Purification Co.,Ltd.,Guangzhou,Guangdong 510655,China
  • Received:2024-06-18 Revised:2024-07-08 Online:2025-03-15 Published:2025-12-16
  • Contact: WANG Zhi,Chief physician,E-mail:zhi_wang@outlook.com;LIN Jingshu,Assistant engineer,E-mail:42164502@qq.com

摘要: 目的 以6家地埋式污水处理厂为研究对象,采用国际采矿和金属委员会(International Council on Mining and Metals,ICMM)职业健康风险评估模型法、综合指数法、澳大利亚法评估职业健康风险,并比较3种方法的评估结果与适用性。方法 2022年选取广州市6家地埋式污水处理厂为评估现场,分别采用ICMM法、综合指数法和澳大利亚法评估职业健康风险,评估结果风险等级换算成风险比值进行比较。结果 6家地埋式污水处理厂各岗位接触硫化氢、氨、氯气、其他粉尘和矽尘检测结果均符合国家职业接触限值要求。ICMM定量法的评估结果显示,硫化氢、氨和氯气的职业健康风险为可容忍的风险,其他粉尘为高风险,矽尘为非常高的风险;ICMM矩阵法的评估结果显示,硫化氢、氨、氯气和其他粉尘的职业健康风险为风险非常低,矽尘为低风险;综合指数法的评估结果显示,硫化氢、氨和氯气的职业健康风险为低风险,其他粉尘为可忽略风险,矽尘为中等风险;澳大利亚法的评估结果显示,硫化氢、氨、氯气和矽尘的职业健康风险为高,其他粉尘为重大。ICMM矩阵法与综合指数法所得的评估结果一致性较好(P>0.01),其他风险评估方法所得的评估结果一致性较差(P<0.01)。结论 3种评估方法应用于地埋式污水处理厂风险评估结果存在明显差异,综合指数法更适用于地埋式污水处理厂职业健康风险评估。

关键词: 地埋式污水处理厂, 职业健康, 风险评估

Abstract: Objective Taking six buried sewage treatment plants as research objects,the International Council on Mining and Metals(ICMM),composite index method,and Australian method were used to evaluate occupational health risks,and the evaluation results and applicability of the three methods were compared. Methods In 2022,six buried sewage treatment plants in Guangzhou were selected as evaluation sites,and the ICMM method,comprehensive index method,and Australian method were used to evaluate occupational health risks. The risk levels of the evaluation results were converted into risk ratios for comparison. Results The detection results of exposure to hydrogen sulfide,ammonia,chlorine gas,other dust,and silica dust in all positions of 6 buried sewage treatment plants met the national occupational exposure limit requirements. The evaluation results of the ICMM quantitative method showed that the occupational health risks of hydrogen sulfide,ammonia,and chlorine gas were tolerable risks,other dust were high risk,and silica dust was very high risk. The evaluation results of the ICMM matrix method showed that the occupational health risks of hydrogen sulfide,ammonia,chlorine gas,and other dust were very low,while silicon dust was low risk. The evaluation results of the comprehensive index method showed that the occupational health risks of hydrogen sulfide,ammonia,and chlorine gas were low risks,other dust was negligible risks,and silica dust was moderate risks. The evaluation results of Australian method showed that the occupational health risks of hydrogen sulfide,ammonia,chlorine gas,and silica dust were high,while other dust was significant. The consistency of the evaluation results obtained by the ICMM matrix method and the comprehensive index method was good(P>0.01),while the consistency of the evaluation results obtained by other risk assessment methods was poor(P<0.01). Conclusion There are significant differences in the risk assessment results of three evaluation methods applied to buried sewage treatment plants,and the comprehensive index method is more suitable for occupational health risk assessment in buried sewage treatment plants.

Key words: Buried sewage treatment plant, Occupational health, Risk assessment

中图分类号: