工作场所韧性量表的汉化及信效度检验

职业与健康 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 55-58.

工作场所韧性量表的汉化及信效度检验

张祎凡^a, 张旺喆麒^a, 王梦佳^a, 贾乂扬^a, 师文文^b, 桂莉^b

海军军医大学 a基础医学院学员三大队八队，b 护理系急救护理学教研室，上海 200433

收稿日期:2022-08-26 修回日期:2022-09-06 发布日期:2026-02-28
通信作者: 师文文，讲师，E-mail：xiaowenz@126.com
作者简介:张祎凡，女，在读本科生。
基金资助:
海军军医大学本科生孵化基地项目（FH2021142）

The Chinese version and assessment of reliability and validity of the workplace resilience scale

ZHANG Yi-fan^a, ZHANGWANG Zhe-qi^a, WANG Meng-jia^a, JIA Yi-yang^a, SHI Wen-wen^b, GUI Li^b

a Basic Medical University, b Department of Emergency Nursing, Department of Nursing, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China

Received:2022-08-26 Revised:2022-09-06 Published:2026-02-28
Contact: SHI Wen-wen，lecturer，E-mail：xiaowenz@126.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的翻译、修订工作场所韧性量表，并检验其信效度。方法基于改良Brislin翻译模型对工作场所韧性量表进行汉化，形成中文版工作场所韧性量表，并通过便利抽样方法于2022年1—3月抽取上海、北京等城市共8所军队医院的317名护理人员进行问卷调查，从而评价量表的信效度。结果工作场所韧性量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.956，折半信度为0.943;量表各条目内容效度指数（item-level content validity index，I-CVI）为0.8~1.0，全体一致内容效度指数（scale-level content validity index，S-CVI）为 0.92;探索性因子显示，量表KMO（Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin）值为0.964。中文版工作场所韧性量表共19个条目，划分为4个维度，主动解决问题、团队效能、自信构建和拼凑，累积方差贡献率达到77.9%。结论中文版工作场所韧性量表具有良好的信效度，可作为护理人员评估工作场所韧性的可靠工具。

关键词: 工作场所韧性, 护理人员, 信度, 效度

Abstract: Objective To translate and revise the workplace resilience scale（WRS） into Chinese version，then to assess the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the WRS. Methods The Chinese version of WRS was formed in the light of the modified Brislin translation model. Totally 317 nurses were selected from eight military hospitals in Shanghai，Beijing and other cities by convenient sampling method from January to March 2022，then the reliability and validity were investigated. Results The Cronbach′s α of WRS was 0.956，split reliability was 0.943. Analysis of content validity of the WRS indicated that the item-level content validity index（I-CVI） was 0.8-1.0，and the scale-level content validity index（S-CVI） was 0.92. Exploratory factor analysis found that the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin（KMO） was 0.964. The Chinese version of WRS consists of 19 items，divided into 4 dimensions： active problem solving，team efficacy，confident sense-making，bricolage，and the cumulative variance contribution rate reached 77.9%. Conclusion The Chinese version of WRS has good reliability and validity，and can be used as a reliable tool to evaluate workplace resilience for nurses.

Key words: Workplace resilience scale, Nurses, Reliability, Validity

中图分类号:

R181.2

张祎凡, 张旺喆麒, 王梦佳, 贾乂扬, 师文文, 桂莉. 工作场所韧性量表的汉化及信效度检验. [J]职业与健康, 2023, 39(1): 55-58.

ZHANG Yi-fan, ZHANGWANG Zhe-qi, WANG Meng-jia, JIA Yi-yang, SHI Wen-wen, GUI Li. The Chinese version and assessment of reliability and validity of the workplace resilience scale. [J]OCCUPATION AND HEALTH, 2023, 39(1): 55-58.

参考文献

[1] ABURN G,GOTT M,HOARE K.What is resilience? An Integrative Review of the empirical literature[J].J Adv Nurs,2016,72(5):980-1000.
[2] 汪辉,徐蕴雪,卢思琪,等.恢复力,弹性或韧性?——社会-生态系统及其相关研究领域中"Resilience"一词翻译之辨析[J].国际城市规划,2017,32(4):29-39.
[3] ANDERSEN S,MINTZ-BINDER R,SWEATT L,et al.Building nurse resilience in the workplace[J].Appl Nurs Res,2021,59(3):151433.
[4] 张斯晋,朱璇,万世惠.新冠肺炎疫情期间临床护士压力情况研究[J].当代医学,2022,28(5):179-182.
[5] CONNOR K M,DAVIDSON J R.Development of a new resilience scale:The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale(CD-RISC)[J].Depress Anxiety,2003,18(2):76-82.
[6] WANGILD G M,YOUNG H M.Development and psychometric evaluation of the Resilience Scale[J].J Nurs Meas,1993,1(2):165-178.
[7] FRIBORG O,HJEMDAL O,ROSENVINGE J H,et al.A new rating scale for adult resilience:What are the central protective resources behind healthy adjustment?[J].Int J Methods Psychiatr Res,2003,12(2):65-76.
[8] 朱厚强,万金,时勘,等.医护人员抗逆力结构研究与测评量表编制[J].统计与信息论坛,2016,31(2):107-112.
[9] MALLAK L A,YILDIZ M.Developing a workplace resilience instrument[J].Work,2016,54(2):241-253.
[10] 王晓娇,夏海鸥.基于Brislin经典回译模型的新型翻译模型的构建及应用[J].护理学杂志,2016,31(7):61-63.
[11] 汪晓寒,吴松起,付悦,等.昼夜节律类型量表的汉化及在医学生中的信效度检验[J].国际医药卫生导报,2022,28(4):479-483.
[12] 刘婷婷,郭静,张天竹,等.护士逆境商自我评价量表的编制及信效度检验[J].护理研究,2022,36(5):830-834.
[13] 卓俟岐,马芳,白阳娟.我国护理人员流失现状的文献计量分析[J].当代护士:中旬刊,2021,28(4):103-105.
[14] WEICK K E.Enacted sensemaking in crisis situations[J].J Manage Stud,1988,25(4):305-317.
[15] KESTER K,WEI H.Building nurse resilience[J].Nurs Manage,2018,49(6):42-45.
[16] 王亚飞,张青,刘宇苗.护士职业韧性的研究进展[J].职业与健康,2022,38(7):1004-1008.
[17] 许珂.护士心理弹性状况特点及影响因素的量性与质性研究[D].重庆:第三军医大学,2017.
[18] 汤小丽,陈利敏,董芬,等.职业韧性在工作负荷与护士情绪衰竭间的调节作用[J].中华全科医学,2022,20(5):890-893.