海鲜产品中空肠弯曲菌2种检测标准的比较

职业与健康 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (18): 2494-2498.

海鲜产品中空肠弯曲菌2种检测标准的比较

刘楚云¹, 马艳萍¹, 段永翔¹, 张茂俊², 何娇明¹, 鞠长燕¹

1.深圳市南山区疾病预防控制中心微生物检验科,广东深圳 518054;
2.中国疾病预防控制中心传染病预防控制所诊断室,北京 102206

收稿日期:2023-01-15 修回日期:2023-03-07 出版日期:2023-09-15 发布日期:2026-03-25
通信作者: 鞠长燕,主任技师,E-mail：juchy3572@163.com
作者简介:刘楚云,女,主管技师,主要从事病原微生物检测工作。
基金资助:
深圳市基金项目（No.SZSM201803081）; 深圳市南山区基金项目（南科研卫第2020049号）; 深圳市南山区基金项目（传染病防控重点学科）

Comparison of two standards for detection of two types of Campylobacter jejuni in seafood

LIU Chuyun¹, MA Yanping¹, DUAN Yongxiang¹, ZHANG Maojun², HE Jiaoming¹, JU Changyan¹

1. Microbiological Testing Department,Shenzhen Nanshan Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Shenzhen Guangdong 518054,China;
2. Diagnosis Room,Institute for Infectious Disease Prevention and Control,Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Beijing 102206,China

Received:2023-01-15 Revised:2023-03-07 Online:2023-09-15 Published:2026-03-25
Contact: JU Changyan,Chief technician,E-mail：juchy3572@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的利用GB 4789.9—2014《食品安全国家标准食品微生物学检验空肠弯曲菌检验》（以下简称GB4789.9法）与T/CPMA 006—2019《空肠弯曲菌、结肠弯曲菌检验方法》（以下简称T/CPMA 006法）2种标准方法检测贝类样品中空肠弯曲菌的阳性率,并用模拟样本以2种检测标准对空肠弯曲菌的最低检出浓度及检出率差别开展讨论。方法 2020年11—12月采集深圳市某市场39份贝类海鲜样品,分别用GB4789.9和T/CPMA 006的2种标准方法进行空肠弯曲菌检测,对于检测阴性的标本,实验室掺入终浓度分别为10⁰、10¹、10² 、10³ 、10⁴ 、10⁵ CFU/g的活菌进行模拟实验,每个浓度模拟3个样品,分析比较2种标准方法的最低检出浓度。根据最低检出浓度,实验室掺入终浓度分别为10³和10⁴ CFU/g的空肠弯曲菌活菌,每个浓度各10份样品,比较2种标准方法的检出率差异。利用基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱（matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry,MALDI-TOF）和荧光聚合酶链反应（polymerase chain reaction,PCR）作为菌落验证和辅助检测。结果 39份原始样品中T/CPMA 006检测标准的空肠弯曲菌阳性率为2.6%（1/39）,而GB 4789.9标准方法均未检出。模拟样本的结果显示,GB 4789.9和T/CPMA 006的最低检出浓度分别是10³和10¹CFU/g,T/CPMA 006比GB 4789.9的最低检出浓度低2个数量级。当样品中空肠弯曲菌终浓度为10³和10⁴ CFU/g时,GB 4789.9的检出率分别为10%（1/10）和20%（2/10）,过滤培养法的检出率皆为100%（10/10）。结论海鲜中也存在空肠弯曲菌的污染,此前国内未见报道。与GB 4789.9标准方法相比,T/CPMA 006标准可显著提高海鲜样品中空肠弯曲菌的检出率,并将最低检出浓度降低2个数量级。

关键词: 空肠弯曲菌, 海鲜, 基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱, 荧光聚合酶链反应

Abstract: Objective To detect the positive rate of Campylobacter jejuni in shellfish samples by GB 4789.9-2014 National Food Safety Standard Food Microbiological Examination Examination of Campylobacter jejuni（hereinafter referred to GB 4789.9 method） and T/CPMA 006-2019 Examination of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli（hereinafter referred to T/CPMA 006 method）,discuss the differences in the minimum detection concentration and detection rate of Campylobacter jejuni between two methods with artificially contaminated samples. Methods From November to December 2020,39 shellfish samples were collected from a market in Shenzhen City,and the Campylobacter jejuni was detected by GB 4789.9 method and T/CPMA 006 method. The negative samples were artificially contaminated with 10⁰,10¹,10²,10³,10⁴ and 10⁵ CFU/g Campylobacter jejunifor the simulation experiment,three samples for each concentration,to analyze and compare the minimum detection concentration of two standard methods. According to the minimum detection concentration,the samples were contaminated with 10³ and 10⁴ CFU/g Campylobacter jejuni,10 samples for each concentration,to compare the detection rate of two standard methods. The matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry（MALDI-TOF） and fluorescent polymerase chain reaction（PCR） were used for the colony validation and auxiliary testing. Results Among 39 original samples,the positive rate of Campylobacter jejuniby T/CPMA 006 method was 2.6%（1/39）,and on sample was detected by GB4789.9 method. Among the artificially contaminated samples,the minimum detection concentration by GB 4789.9 method and T/CPMA 006 method was 10³ and 10¹ CFU/g,and the minimum detection concentration of T/CPMA 006 was 2 orders of magnitude lower than that of GB 4789.9. When the final concentration of Campylobacter jejuni was 10³ and 10¹ CFU/g,the detection rate by GB 4789.9 was 10%（1/10） and 20%（2/10） respectively,while the detection rate of filtration culture method were both 100%（10/10）. Conclusions The Campylobacter jejuni pollution exists in seafood,which has not been reported in China previously. Compared with GB 4789.9 method,the T/CPMA 006 method significantly improves the detection rate of Campylobacter jejuniin seafood,and reduced the minimum detection concentration by 2 orders of magnitude.

Key words: Campylobacter jejuni, Seafood, Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry, Fluorescence PCR

中图分类号:

R117

刘楚云, 马艳萍, 段永翔, 张茂俊, 何娇明, 鞠长燕. 海鲜产品中空肠弯曲菌2种检测标准的比较. [J]职业与健康, 2023, 39(18): 2494-2498.

LIU Chuyun, MA Yanping, DUAN Yongxiang, ZHANG Maojun, HE Jiaoming, JU Changyan. Comparison of two standards for detection of two types of Campylobacter jejuni in seafood. [J]OCCUPATION AND HEALTH, 2023, 39(18): 2494-2498.

参考文献

[1] COSTA D,IRAOLA G.Pathogenomics of Emerging Campylobacter Species[J].Clin Microbiol Rev,2019,32(4):e00072-8.
[2] RAHMAN M A,PAUL P R,HOQUE N,et al.Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter Species in Diarrheal Patients in Mymensingh,Bangladesh[J].Biomed Res Int,2021,2021:9229485.
[3] CONTRERAS-OMAÑA R,ESCORCIA-SAUCEDO A E,VELARDE-RUIZV J.Prevalence and impact of antimicrobial resistance in gastrointestinal infections:A review[J].Rev Gastroenterol Mex,2021,86(3):265-275.
[4] LEE H,YOON Y.Etiological Agents Implicated in Foodborne Illness World Wide[J].Food Sci Anim Resour,2021,41(1):1-7.
[5] DONNER V,CROXATTO A,TISSOT F.Invasive Campylobacter infections[J].Rev Med Suisse,2021,17(734):722-725.
[6] JACKSON B R,ZEGARRA J A,LÓPEZ-GATELL H,et al.Binational outbreak of Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with Campylobacter jejuni infection,Mexico and USA,2011[J].Epidemiol Infect,2014,142(5):1089-1099.
[7] SHAHRIZAILA N,LEHMANN H C,KUWABARA S.Guillain-Barré syndrome[J].Lancet,2021,397(10280):1214-1228.
[8] 邓晖,吴江,杨薇,等.长春市双阳区群发吉兰-巴雷综合征临床资料分析[J].中华神经科杂志,2009,42(1):30-33.
[9] JARAMILLO-VALVERDE L,LEVANO K S,VILLANUEVA I,et al.Guillain-Barre syndrome outbreak in Peru:Association with polymorphisms in IL-17,ICAM1,and CD1[J].Mol Genet Genomic Med,2019,7(10):e960.
[10] 国家卫生和计划生育委员会.食品安全国家标准食品微生物学检验空肠弯曲菌检验:GB 4789.9—2014[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2014:1-5.
[11] 吴平芳,贺连华,刘涛,等.深圳市肉类食品空肠弯曲菌的污染情况调查[J].热带医学杂志,2007,17(4):368-369.
[12] 巢国祥,徐勤,朱炳炎,等.扬州市2002—2003食源性致病菌监测研究[J].中国卫生检验杂志,2004,14(4):484-486.
[13] 中国预防医学会.空肠弯曲菌、结肠弯曲菌检验方法(T/CPMA 006-2019)[J].中国流行病学杂志,2019,40(9):1-8.
[14] 李颖,梁昊,王苗,等.北京市顺义区零售鸡胴体中弯曲菌分布与分子特征研究[J].中国食品卫生杂志,2019,31(4):351-355.
[15] 吴洁,金玉娟,刘丽红,等.深圳市龙岗区空肠弯曲菌感染状况及耐药性分析[J].热带医学杂志,2019,22(4):497-501.
[16] 鞠长燕,马艳萍,张茂俊,等.深圳市腹泻患者、禽源和牛源空肠弯曲菌的脉冲场凝胶电泳分析[J].中国热带医学,2018,18(11):1123-1128.
[17] LEBLANC-MARIDOR M,BEAUDEAU F,SEEGERS H,et al.Rapid identification and quantification of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni by real-time PCR in pure cultures and in complex samples[J].BMC Microbiol,2011,11:113.
[18] 炊慧霞,吴玲玲,李艳芬,等.2016年河南省市售生禽肉沙门菌和弯曲杆菌污染状况调查[J].中国家禽,2017(11):77-80.
[19] 周倩,唐梦君,张小燕,等.江苏省禽源空肠弯曲杆菌的分离鉴定及耐药性研究[J].中国人兽共患病学报,2017(6):495-500.
[20] 赵世铭. 质谱技术应用于临床微生物检测中的研究进展[J].中国医疗器械信息,2020(17):28-29.
[21] 韩硕. 全自动快速微生物质谱检测系统鉴定流感嗜血杆菌及其可靠性分析[J].名医,2020(8):138-139.
[22] 沈玲,白欢,李丽,等.AUTOF MS 1000质谱鉴定系统对临床实验室常见菌株鉴定能力的评估[J].现代检验医学杂志,2020,35(3):100-102.
[23] 左瑞菊. 质谱技术在微生物检测和鉴定中的应用[J].医学食疗与健康,2020(21):180-181.
[24] 李振,汪丙松,王昭俐,等.质谱法与聚合酶链式反应检测法检测百日咳鲍特菌[J].中国临床医生杂志,2020,48(1):92-94.
[25] 屠博文,吉俊敏,杜强,等.基质辅助激光解析飞行质谱法检测空肠弯曲菌及李斯特菌[J].食品科学. 2017,38(20):262-267.