职业与健康 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (17): 2383-2388.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

主动性人格对工作幸福感的影响

张岚1,2, 侯金芹3, 陈祉妍1   

  1. 1.中国科学院心理健康重点实验室(中国科学院心理研究所),北京 100101;
    2.中国科学院大学心理学系,北京 100049;
    3.中国教育科学研究院心理与特殊教育研究所,北京 100088
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-14 修回日期:2024-01-08 发布日期:2026-03-17
  • 通信作者: 陈祉妍,教授,E-mail:chenzy@psych.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:张岚,女,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为管理心理学。
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目(21BSH099)

Influence of proactive personality on work well-being

ZHANG Lan1,2, HOU Jinqin3, CHEN Zhiyan1   

  1. 1. CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health,Institute of Psychology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China;
    2. Department of Psychology,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China;
    3. Institute of Psychology and Special Education, China National Academy of Educational Sciences,Beijing 100088,China
  • Received:2023-12-14 Revised:2024-01-08 Published:2026-03-17
  • Contact: CHEN Zhiyan,Professor,E-mail:chenzy@psych.psych.ac.cn

摘要: 目的 基于社会生态系统理论,探讨员工主动性人格与工作幸福感的关系,以及心理资本的中介作用和教练型领导的调节作用。方法 2022年2—5月,采用方便取样法在国内8家企业选取调研样本,使用主动性人格量表、工作幸福感量表、心理资本量表和教练型领导量表对668名员工进行问卷调查。采用SPSS 26.0宏程序进行有调节的中介效应检验。结果 调研对象主动性人格、工作幸福感和心理资本得分分别为(5.67±0.88)(5.39±1.00)和(4.56±0.63)分;教练型领导得分为(5.67±0.96)分。不同年龄员工的工作幸福感得分比较,差异有统计学意义(t=2.73,P<0.05),40~<50岁员工幸福感最高;心理资本随年龄和学历的升高而升高(t=8.73、5.18,均P<0.01);主动性人格与工作幸福感、心理资本之间呈正相关(r=0.62、0.63,均P<0.01),心理资本与工作幸福感呈正相关(r=0.64,P<0.01)。主动性人格显著正向预测工作幸福感(β=0.62,P<0.01);心理资本在主动性人格与工作幸福感之间起部分中介作用,占总效应的44.34%;教练型领导正向调节主动性人格与工作幸福感的关系(β=0.06,P<0.05),以及心理资本中介效应前半段(β=0.05,P<0.05)。结论 主动性人格正向预测工作幸福感,心理资本在主动性人格与工作幸福感之间起中介作用。教练型领导在主动性人格、心理资本与工作幸福感的关系之间发挥调节作用。

关键词: 主动性人格, 工作幸福感, 心理资本, 教练型领导

Abstract: Objective Based on the theory of social ecosystem,to explore the relationship between employees' proactive personality and work well-being,as well as the mediating role of psychological capital and the moderating role of coaching leadership. Methods From February to May 2022,a convenience sampling method was used to select research samples from 8 domestic enterprises. A questionnaire survey was conducted on 668 employees using the proactive personality scale,work well-being scale,psychological capital scale and coaching leadership scale. The moderated mediation effect was tested using SPSS 26.0 macro program. Results The scores of proactive personality,work well-being,and psychological capital of the survey subjects were (5.67±0.88),(5.39±1.00) and (4.56±0.63)points,respectively. The score of coaching leadership was (5.67±0.96)points. There were statistically significant differences in work well-being among employees of different ages(t=2.73,P<0.05),with employees aged 40- <50 having the highest level of happiness. Psychological capital increased with age and education(t=8.73,5.18,both P<0.01). There were significant positive correlation between proactive personality and work well-being as well as psychological capital(r=0.62,0.63, both P<0.01),and a positive correlation between psychological capital and work well-being(r=0.64,P<0.01). Proactive personality significantly positively predicts work well-being(β=0.62,P<0.01). Psychological capital partially mediated the relationship between proactive personality and work well-being,accounting for 44.34% of the total effect. Coaching leadership positively moderates the relationship between proactive personality and work well-being(β=0.06,P<0.05),as well as the first half of the mediating effect of psychological capital(β=0.05,P<0.05). Conclusion Proactive personality positively predicts work well-being,and psychological capital plays a mediating role between proactive personality and work well-being. Coaching leadership plays a moderating role in the relationship between proactive personality,psychological capital and work well-being.

Key words: Proactive personality, Work well-being, Psychological capital, Coaching leadership

中图分类号: