广东某高校大学生有恒性人格和不反应在父母科技干扰影响内化问题中的作用

职业与健康 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 254-258.

广东某高校大学生有恒性人格和不反应在父母科技干扰影响内化问题中的作用

张超^a, 李娇娇^b, 杨明^c, 陈少鸿^a

广州华商学院 a 外国语学院,b 心理健康教育与咨询中心, c马克思主义学院,广东广州 511300

收稿日期:2024-05-18 修回日期:2024-05-27 出版日期:2025-01-15 发布日期:2025-12-11
通信作者: 李娇娇,副教授,E-mail：lijiaojiao1209@163.com
作者简介:张超,男,助理研究员,主要从事大学生心理健康教育工作。
基金资助:
广东省2023年度教育科学规划课题（2023JKDY049）; 广州华商学院2023年校内导师制科研项目（2023HSDS23）; 广东省2023年度教育科学规划课题（2023JKDY048）

Effect of persistent personality and sense of non-reactivity in the relationship between parental technoference and college student internalizing problems in a certain university in Guangdong Province

ZHANG Chao^a, LI Jiaojiao^b, YANG Ming^c, CHEN Shaohong^a

a School of Foreign Languages, b Psychological Health Education and Counseling Center, c School of Marxism, Guangzhou Huashang Vocational College, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511300, China

Received:2024-05-18 Revised:2024-05-27 Online:2025-01-15 Published:2025-12-11
Contact: LI Jiaojiao,Associate professor,E-mail：lijiaojiao1209@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探究有恒性人格在父母科技干扰与大学生内化问题间所起的中介作用及不反应在有恒性人格和内化问题间的调节作用。方法 2023年9—10月,以随机抽样方式对广东省某所高校450名大学生采用父母科技干扰量表、有恒性人格量表、不反应量表和症状自评量表进行问卷调查,并对数据进行分析。结果父母科技干扰得分为（19.11±9.43）分,大学生内化问题得分为（66.79±39.11）分,有恒性人格得分为（9.63±4.49）分,不反应得分为（17.51±6.79）分。父母科技干扰与内化问题呈正相关（r=0.592,P<0.01）,与有恒性人格呈负相关（r=-0.601,P<0.01）;有恒性人格和内化问题呈负相关（r=-0.801,P<0.01）。有恒性人格在父母科技干扰与内化问题间起部分中介作用（95%CI：0.171~0.272）;不反应在有恒性人格影响内化问题过程中有显著的调节作用（β=0.330,P<0.01）。结论父母科技干扰不仅可以直接正向预测内化问题,还可以通过有恒性人格对其产生间接作用。不反应具有调节作用,相对于低不反应者,高不反应者的有恒性人格对内化问题的作用更小。

关键词: 父母科技干扰, 内化问题, 有恒性人格, 不反应, 大学生

Abstract: Objective To explore the mediating role of persistent personality in the relationship between parental technoference and internalization problems among college students,as well as the moderating role of sense of non-reactivity in the relationship between persistent personality and internalization problems. Methods From September to October in 2023,a random sampling method was used to conduct a questionnaire survey on 450 college students from a university in Guangdong Province,using the parental technoference scale,persistent personality scale,non-reactivity scale,symptom checklist 90 scale（SCL-90）,and the data was analyzed. Results The score of parental technoferenceamong college students was （19.11±9.43）point,the score of internalization problems among college students was （66.79±39.11）point,the score of persistent personality was （9.63±4.49） point,and the score of non-reactivity was （17.51±6.79）point. There was a positive correlation between parental technoference and internalization problems（r=0.59,P<0.01）,and a negative correlation with persistent personality（r=-0.60,P<0.01）. There was a negative correlation between persistent personality and internalization problems（r=-0.80,P<0.01）. Persistent personality partially mediated the relationship between parental technoference and internalization problems（95%CI：0.171-0.272）. There was a significant regulatory effect in the process of internalizing problems influenced by persistent personality（β=0.330,P<0.01）. Conclusion Parental technological interference can not only directly and positively predict internalizing problems,but also indirectly affect them through a persistent personality. Sense of non-reactivity have a regulatory effect,and compared to low responders,high non responders have a smaller effect on internalizing problems due to their persistent personality.

Key words: Parental technoference, Internalizing problems, Persistent personality, Non-reactivity, College student

中图分类号:

R181.3

张超, 李娇娇, 杨明, 陈少鸿. 广东某高校大学生有恒性人格和不反应在父母科技干扰影响内化问题中的作用. [J]职业与健康, 2025, 41(2): 254-258.

ZHANG Chao, LI Jiaojiao, YANG Ming, CHEN Shaohong. Effect of persistent personality and sense of non-reactivity in the relationship between parental technoference and college student internalizing problems in a certain university in Guangdong Province. [J]OCCUPATION AND HEALTH, 2025, 41(2): 254-258.

参考文献

[1] BUIST L K,DEKOVIC M,GERRIS R J.Dyadic family relationships and adolescent internalizing and externalizing problem behavior:Effects of positive and negative affect[J].Fam Sci,2011,2(1):34-42.
[2] 光明网.中科院发布心理健康蓝皮书——成年人群自评心理健康状况总体良好[EB/OL].(2023-02-27)[2023-12-25].https://m.gmw.cn/baijia/2023-02/27/36392013.html.
[3] LOPES M S D,MANUELA M P,FIGURIREDO S C.The association between externalizing and internalizing problems with bullying engagement in adolescents:The mediating role of social skills[J].Int J Environ Res Public Health,2021,18(19):10444.
[4] 肖健菁. 青少年父亲情感支持、应对策略与内化问题的关系研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2020.
[5] 杨志伟. 卡特尔人格因素问卷(中文智评版)的修订及检验[D].西安:第四军医大学,2015.
[6] 李金元. 高中生家庭功能、人格特质、网络欺负行为的关系研究[D].济南:济南大学,2020.
[7] JERUSHA L M,JELENA K,ALIX K H,et al.Impacts of parental technoference on parent-child relationships and child health and developmental outcomes:A scoping review protocol[J].Syst Rev,2022,11(1):45-45.
[8] 安蕾;赵国祥.高中生强迫思考倾向与抑郁状态:压力知觉的中介作用及不反应的调节作用[J].心理科学,2022,45(1):41-46.
[9] 刘勤学;胡琼;祁迪.亲子间科技干扰与青少年网络人际关系成瘾:有调节的中介模型[J].心理科学,2021,44(2):316-323.
[10] DIXON D,KAREN H.Parental technoference and adolescents' mental health and violent behaviour:A scoping review[J].BMC Public Health,2023,23(1):2053-2053.
[11] QIAO L,LIU Q.The effect of technoference in parent-child relationships on adolescent smartphone addiction:The role of cognitive factors[J].Child Youth Serv Rev,2020 24(3):1053-1040.
[12] 韩晶晶. 亲子间科技干扰对青少年抑郁的影响:功能失调性态度的中介作用与父母情感温暖的调节作用[D].沈阳:沈阳师范大学,2022.
[13] 宋雪. 亲子科技干扰对青少年智能手机成瘾的影响机制及其干预[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2020.
[14] 祝蓓里,戴忠恒.卡氏十六种人格因素中国常模的修订[J].心理科学通讯,1988,6(4):16-20.
[15] 邓玉琴. 心智觉知训练对大学生心理健康水平的干预效果[D].北京:首都师范大学,2009.
[16] 金华,吴文源,张明园.中国正常人SCL-90评定结果的初步分析[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,1986,12(5):260-263.
[17] 秦喆. 大学生感恩意识与人格特征、父母养育方式的关系研究[D].扬州:扬州大学,2009.
[18] JUANJUAN S,JUNSHENG L.Maternal overcontrol and young children's internalizing problems in China:The roles of social competence and teacher-child conflict[J].Early Educ Dev,2023,34(8):1816-1829.
[19] LIU Q,WU J Y,ZHOU Z K,et al.Parental technoference and smartphone addiction in Chinese adolescents:The mediating role of social sensitivity and loneliness[J].Child Youth Serv Rev,2020,30(2),118-119.
[20] PETERSON A C,SARIGIANI P A,KENNEDY R E.Adolescent depression:Why more girls? [J].J Youth Adolesc,1991,20(2):247-271.
[21] JUDEE K,BURGOON H G.Interpersonal expectations,expectancy violations,and emotional communication[J].J Lan Soc Psychol,2016, 10(8):220-221.
[22] METCALFE A,JANET M.A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification:Dynamics of willpower[J].Psychol Rev,1999,106(1):3.
[23] 李师. 青少年父母教养行为、人格特质与心理弹性的关系研究[D].乌鲁木齐:新疆师范大学,2022.
[24] CASPI B,AVSHALOM M,TERRIE E.Individual differences are accentuated during periods of social change:The sample case of girls at puberty[J].J Abnorm Soc Psychol,1991(17):97-99.
[25] GOUVEIA J M,CARONA C,CANVARRO C M,et al.Self-compassion and dispositional mindfulness are associated with parenting styles and parenting stress:The mediating role of mindful parenting[J].Mindfulness,2016,7(3):700-712.
[26] 王英杰,栾金鑫,李燕.母亲养育压力与幼儿焦虑的关系:亲子冲突的中介作用和母亲正念的调节作用[J].心理发展与教育,2023,39(5):702-709.