西安市某机加厂电镀车间逸散酸雾综合治理方案研究

职业与健康 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (3): 309-314.

西安市某机加厂电镀车间逸散酸雾综合治理方案研究

孙玉玺^1a,2, 邢亚飞^1a,2, 刘仓^1a,2, 王明^1a,2, 孟荣荣^1a,2, 刘思奇^1b

1.兵器工业卫生研究所 a科研八室,b科研管理处,陕西西安 710065;
2.陕西省职业病危害工程防护技术指导中心,陕西西安 710065

收稿日期:2024-05-31 修回日期:2024-06-17 出版日期:2025-02-01 发布日期:2025-12-17
通信作者: 邢亚飞,正高级工程师,E-mail：GCFH521@163.com
作者简介:孙玉玺,男,助理工程师,主要从事职业卫生工程治理与防护技术研究工作。
基金资助:
中国兵器工业集团统筹安全生产经费资助项目（JTK2023-01）; 陕西省疾控职业病危害工程防护技术成果转移转化项目（HSJK-88）

Research on comprehensive management scheme of scattered acid mist in plating workshop of a machine shop in Xi'an City

SUN Yuxi^1a,2, XING Yafei^1a,2, LIU Cang^1a,2, WANG Ming^1a,2, MENG Rongrong^1a,2, LIU Siqi^1b

1. a Eighth Research Department,b Scientific Research Management Office,Institute for Hygiene of Ordnance Industry,Xi'an,Shaanxi 710065,China;
2. Occupational Disease Hazard Engineering Protection Technology Guidance Center of Shaanxi Province,Xi'an,Shaanxi 710065,China

Received:2024-05-31 Revised:2024-06-17 Online:2025-02-01 Published:2025-12-17
Contact: XING Yafei,Senior engineer,E-mail：GCFH521@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的了解电镀车间电镀作业过程中盐酸酸雾等有害物质浓度超标现状,为电镀车间侧吸式排风系统的合理设计提供参考依据。方法 2023年7月以西安市某机加厂电镀车间为研究对象,采用职业卫生现场调查、现场检测、理论分析计算、仿真数值模拟等方法,核算排风系统风量需求,提出逸散酸雾综合治理方案,并验证改进效果。结果经过现场勘查与检测,当前排风系统实测总风量为11 057.04 m³/h,不满足实际排风风量需求。对电镀车间槽边排风系统所需风量进行核算,并对设计方案进行改进,数值模拟得出,风量核算结果满足系统排风需求。电镀车间原排风罩口风速最大为3.4 m/s,最小为0.292 m/s,风速不均匀度为0.65;进行方案优化后的排风罩口风速最大为12.984 m/s,最小为12.032 m/s,风速不均匀度为0.03,改进效果良好。结论电镀车间盐酸酸雾浓度超标,这是由于排风系统风量过小、风压不足、排风设施及管道酸蚀严重、排风罩设计不合理引起,经改进与验证,综合治理方案对盐酸酸雾的控制效果较好。

关键词: 电镀车间, 侧吸式排风, 均流设计, 数值模拟, 工程治理, 通风防护技术

Abstract: Objective To understand the situation of excessive concentrations of harmful substances such as hydrochloric acid mist during the electroplating process in the workshop,provide reference guidelines for the rational design of a side suction exhaust system for the electroplating workshop. Methods In July 2023,the plating workshop of a machine shop in Xi'an City was selected as the research object. The occupational hygiene on-site investigation,on-site testing,theoretical analysis and calculation,simulation and numerical analysis and other methods were used to calculate the air volume demand of the exhaust system,propose a comprehensive management scheme for scattered acid mist,and verify the improvement effect. Results Following on-site inspection and testing,it was found that the measured total air volume of the current ventilation system is 11 057.04 m³/h,which does not meet the actual exhaust volume requirements. The required air volume for the side exhaust system in the electroplating workshop was recalculated,and the design proposal was improved. The numerical simulations demonstrated that the calculated air volume meets the exhaust requirements of the system. The original air velocity at the exhaust hood openings in the electroplating workshop ranged from 3.4 m/s to 0.292 m/s,with an unevenness index of 0.65. After plan optimization,the maximum air velocity at the exhaust hood openings reached 12.984 m/s,with a minimum of 12.032 m/s,and an air velocity unevenness index of 0.03,indicating significant improvement in performance. Conclusions The excessive concentration of hydrochloric acid mist in the plating workshop is caused by insufficient air volume of the exhaust system,inadequate wind pressure,serious corrosion of exhaust facilities and pipes,and unreasonable design of exhaust hoods. After improvement and verification,the comprehensive management scheme has a good control effect on hydrochloric acid mist.

Key words: Plating workshop, Side suction exhaust, Uniform flow design, Numerical simulation, Engineering management, Ventilation protection technology

中图分类号:

R134⁺.2

孙玉玺, 邢亚飞, 刘仓, 王明, 孟荣荣, 刘思奇. 西安市某机加厂电镀车间逸散酸雾综合治理方案研究. [J]职业与健康, 2025, 41(3): 309-314.

SUN Yuxi, XING Yafei, LIU Cang, WANG Ming, MENG Rongrong, LIU Siqi. Research on comprehensive management scheme of scattered acid mist in plating workshop of a machine shop in Xi'an City. [J]OCCUPATION AND HEALTH, 2025, 41(3): 309-314.

参考文献

[1] 任英欣,刘金伟.环境保护法视角下电镀行业发展策略研究[J].电镀与精饰,2022,44(11):107-108.
[2] 宋文恩. 电镀企业重金属污染场地土壤修复技术研究[J].皮革制作与环保科技,2022,3(11):133-135.
[3] 张胜,陈金茹,涂晓志,等.深圳辖区内电镀企业主要职业病危害因素检测结果[J].职业与健康,2014,30(14):1895-1897.
[4] 杨健. 电镀企业土壤污染隐患排查研究[J].中国资源综合利用,2023, 41(12):195-197.
[5] 吕惠中,余新天,代浩.深圳市沙井街道某电镀企业职业病危害现状[J].职业与健康,2017,33(9):1161-1164.
[6] 雍正,罗泽娇,宋萌萌.武汉某退役电镀车间场地土壤重金属污染及形态分析[J].安全与环境工程,2014,21(3):46-50,59.
[7] 金祖华,尤佳恺,梁继仁,等.电镀厂职业病危害现状调查[J].职业与健康,2015,31(2):249-250,253.
[8] 徐爱国,王飞霞,孙振国.某电镀产业园废水处理中心职业病防护设施设计探讨[J].中国卫生工程学,2021,20(2):193-197,200.
[9] 贾燕,白群华,肖虹.重庆市某电镀厂聚集区域铬污染状况调查[J].现代预防医学,2014,41(6):978-980,983.
[10] 张志刚,张体艳.郑州市某企业电镀车间职业病危害因素检测结果[J].职业与健康,2013,29(21):2772-2774.
[11] 吴钢,吉俊敏,刘炘,等.电镀企业中重金属污染现状和接触途径调查[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2017,35(11):858-861.
[12] 龚伟,吉俊敏,吴林林,等.某电镀企业工人低水平六价铬接触调查[J].中国职业医学,2018,45(2):235-238.
[13] 宾海华,张胜,朱志良,等.电镀行业职业病危害的现场干预[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2014,32(6):433-435.
[14] 范新芳. 苏州高新区某电镀企业职业危害的防治效果研究[J].中国卫生工程学,2010,9(6):444-446.
[15] 姚卓城,叶春嫦,游春年,等.2020年惠州市企业噪声危害现状调查[J].职业与健康,2024,40(1):24-31,36.
[16] 李勇. 白山市职业病危害现状调查[J].中国卫生工程学,2023,22(6):780-782.
[17] 国家质量监督检验检疫总局,国家标准化管理委员会.排风罩的分类及技术条件:GB/T 16758—2008[S].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008: 8-9.
[18] 孙一坚. 简明通风设计手册[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1997:133-138.
[19] 孙一坚,沈恒根.工业通风[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010:49-52.
[20] 国家住房和城乡建设部,国家质量监督检验检疫总局.工业建筑供暖通风与空气调节设计规范:GB 50019—2015[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2015:43-45.
[21] 杨斌,胡萍,陈建武,等.天津市某造船厂涂装车间吹吸式通风系统排风效果数值模拟研究[J].职业与健康,2019,35(15):2020-2024.
[22] 杜文霞,刘仓,刘寅超,等.数值模拟及发烟测试在某研究所喷砂间矽尘危害治理中的应用[J].中国卫生工程学,2021,20(4):559-562.
[23] 刘仓,孙苑菡,唐虹,等.某炸药切药生产工房乙醇空间浓度分布规律研究[J].中国卫生工程学,2020,19(2):174-178.