职业与健康 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (16): 2274-2278.

• 卫生管理与研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

省级疾病预防控制机构人才培养项目阶段性实施效果评估

杜莹, 倪洋, 陈若男, 孙颖, 曾强(), 陈璐()   

  1. 天津市疾病预防控制中心天津 300011
  • 收稿日期:2026-04-09 修回日期:2026-06-05 出版日期:2026-08-15 发布日期:2026-08-10
  • 通信作者: 曾强,E-mail:tjcdczys@163.com;陈璐,E-mail:chenlu6@tj.gov.cn
  • 作者简介:杜莹,女,助理研究员,主要从事疾病预防控制人才培养工作。
  • 基金资助:
    天津市医学重点建设学科(TJYXZDXK-3-020B)

Interim implementation effect evaluation of talent cultivation program in provincial centers for disease control and prevention

DU Ying, NI Yang, CHEN Ruonan, SUN Ying, ZENG Qiang(), CHEN Lu()   

  1. Tianjin Centers for Disease Control and PreventionTianjin 300011, China
  • Received:2026-04-09 Revised:2026-06-05 Online:2026-08-15 Published:2026-08-10
  • Contact: ZENG Qiang,E-mail:tjcdczys@163.com;CHEN Lu,E-mail:chenlu6@tj.gov.cn

摘要:

目的 评估人才培养项目阶段性投入与产出结果,分析评价实施效果及存在问题,探索符合现代化疾病预防控制(疾控)体系的人才队伍培养路径和评价支持体系。方法 以2024年9月入选“人才梯队”培养支持项目的50名中青年人才作为研究对象,采用回顾性调查研究方法,收集研究对象基本情况、第一年度投入产出和考核结果情况,采用描述统计分析及非参数检验对其进行分析。结果 第一年度培养期间,三个梯队人才经费投入产出比分别为2.20、0.20和0.55,差异有统计学意义(χ2=12.374,P<0.01)。在产出方面,获批经费、学术产出与专业产出呈现不同趋势,获批经费和学术产出中,高梯队层次、高职称和高学历研究对象产出均较高(χ2=12.374、20.095、14.448,Z=-2.568,均P<0.05),而不同专业间无此特点;专业产出中,公共卫生、疾病控制、实验检测专业研究对象的产出呈现由高到低的趋势(χ2=9.109,P<0.05),但在不同梯队层次、职称学历方面无此趋势。结论 “人才梯队”培养项目顺应疾控事业高质量发展需求,应差异化设置多层次人才培养模式。目前疾控专业能力水平存在难以量化的难点,建立客观评价指标体系和专家评审特色工作业绩是现阶段评价疾控专业能力水平的可行合理方式。

关键词: 疾病预防控制, 人才培养, 效果评估, 投入, 产出, 培养策略

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the phased input and output results of talent cultivation program,analyze the implementation effect and problems,and explore the talent cultivation path and evaluation support system that conforms to the modern centers for disease control and prevention(CDC) system. Methods Fifty middle-aged and young talents selected into the "Talent Team Cultivation" program were chosen as the research subjects.A retrospective investigation was adopted to collect the basic information of the research subjects,the input-output of the first year and the assessment results,and descriptive statistical analysis and non-parametric tests were used to analyze them. Results During the first year of training,the input-output ratios of funds for the three tiers of talents were 2.20,0.20,and 0.55,respectively,and the differences were statistically significant(χ2=12.374,P<0.01).For output,approved funds,academic output and professional output showed different trends. Among the approved funds and academic outputs,the output of high tier levels,high professional titles and high academic qualifications were relatively high(χ2=12.374,20.095,14.448,Z=-2.568,all P<0.05),while there was no such characteristic among different specialties. Among the professional outputs,the outputs of public health,disease control,and laboratory detection showed a trend from high to low(χ2=9.109,P<0.05),but there were no such trend in terms of different echelon levels,professional titles,and educational qualifications. Conclusion The "Talent Team Cultivation" program conforms to the high-quality development needs of the CDC,and should set up a differentiated multilevel talent cultivation model. At present,there are difficulties in quantifying the professional competence of talent in CDC. Establish an objective evaluation index system and expert review of characteristic work achievements are feasible and reasonable way to evaluate the CDC's professional competence of talent now.

Key words: Disease prevention and control, Talent team cultivation, Effect evaluation, Investment, Output, Cultivation strategy

中图分类号: