职业与健康 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (3): 412-416.

• 卫生管理与研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

2022—2023年新疆35家健康企业复核结果分析

李雪丹1, 韩宜成1, 杨成新2, 杨丹3, 杨倩2, 何平2()   

  1. 1.新疆医科大学公共卫生学院新疆 乌鲁木齐 830011
    2.新疆维吾尔自治区第三人民医院新疆 乌鲁木齐 830091
    3.石河子大学新疆 石河子 832003
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-12 修回日期:2025-05-26 出版日期:2026-02-01 发布日期:2026-03-06
  • 通信作者: 何平,E-mail:304230180@qq.com
  • 作者简介:李雪丹,女,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为职业卫生与职业健康。
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区第三人民医院院内项目(2021QSYYK01)

Analysis of the review results of 35 healthy enterprises in Xinjiang from 2022 to 2023

LI Xuedan1, HAN Yicheng1, YANG Chengxin2, YANG Dan3, YANG Qian2, HE Ping2()   

  1. 1. School of Public HealthXinjiang Medical University,UrumqiXinjiang 830011,China
    2. The Third People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous RegionUrumqiXinjiang 830091,China
    3. Shihezi UniversityShiheziXinjiang 832003,China
  • Received:2025-05-12 Revised:2025-05-26 Online:2026-02-01 Published:2026-03-06
  • Contact: HE Ping,E-mail:304230180@qq.com

摘要:

目的 分析新疆自治区级创建健康企业的复核资料,为后续健康企业创建工作提供数据参考。方法 收集并汇总2022—2023年度参加新疆自治区级健康企业复核的35家企业复核表,采用方差分析比较不同门类及规模企业间的平均得分差异,采用χ2检验比较不同类别考核指标间得分率差异。结果 2022年度共复核自治区级健康企业22家,复核通过率为63.64%(14/22);2023年度共复核自治区级健康企业13家,复核通过率为84.62%(11/13)。2022—2023年度,不同规模企业的复核平均得分比较,差异均无统计学意义(F=0.901、0.827,均P>0.05);不同行业间企业平均得分比较,2022年差异有统计学意义(F=3.494,P<0.05),2023年差异无统计学意义(F=0.246,P>0.05)。2022—2023年,不同评估类别企业得分比较,差异均有统计学意义(χ2=402.7、17.248,均P<0.05)。2022—2023年度中均失分率较高的具体单项指标为有效落实病媒生物防制,占65.45%和26.15%;设立医务室,占72.73%和48.72%;设立心理健康辅导室,占39.09%和56.92%;制订并实施员工心理援助计划,占38.86%和30.77%。结论 2022—2023年度,新疆健康企业的复核评分通过率从63.64%提升至84.62%,企业在验收评分中的表现有所改进,整体评分通过率显著提高,但参评企业对健康企业建设的重视程度仍需加强。落实病媒生物防制、设立医务室、设立心理健康辅导室、制订并实施员工心理援助计划、落实职业病防护设施“三同时”制度等也是健康企业创建中需要关注的问题。

关键词: 健康企业, 复核评估, 评价指标

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the review data of Xinjiang Autonomous Region-level healthy enterprises,and provide data reference for future healthy enterprise creation efforts. Methods The review forms of 35 enterprises that participated in the Xinjiang Autonomous Region-level healthy enterprise review from 2022 to 2023 were collected and summarized. ANOVA was used to compare the differences in average scores among enterprises of different categories and scales,while the chi-square test was used to compare the differences in score rates among different assessment indicators. Results In 2022,a total of 22 autonomous region-level healthy enterprises were reviewed,with a pass rate of 63.64%(14/22). In 2023,13 enterprises were reviewed,with a pass rate of 84.62%(11/13). The differences in average review scores among enterprises of different scales were not statistically significant in both 2022 and 2023(F=0.901,0.827,both P>0.05). The differences in average review scores among enterprises of different industries were statistically significant in 2022(F=3.494,P<0.05),but no statistically significant difference in 2023(F=0.246,P>0.05). The differences in review scores among enterprises of different assessment categories were statistically significant in both 2022 and 2023(χ2=402.7,17.248,both P<0.05). The specific single indicators with a high average loss rate in both 2022 and 2023 were effective implementation of vector-borne disease prevention and control(65.45%,26.15%),establishment of a medical room(72.73%,48.72%),establishment of a psychological counseling room(39.09%,56.92%),and development and implementation of an employee assistance program(38.86%,30.77%). Conclusion From 2022 to 2023,the pass rate of review scores for healthy enterprises in Xinjiang increased from 63.64% to 84.62%,indicating an improvement in enterprises' performance in acceptance scoring and a significant increase in the overall pass rate. However,the attention of participating enterprises to healthy enterprise construction still needs to be strengthened. Key issues to be addressed in the creation of healthy enterprises include the implementation of vector-borne disease prevention and control,the establishment of medical rooms and psychological counseling rooms,the development and implementation of employee assistance programs,and the enforcement of the "Three Simultaneities" system for occupational disease prevention facilities.

Key words: Healthy enterprises, Review evaluation, Evaluation indicators

中图分类号: