父母教养方式与青少年反刍思维的相关性分析

职业与健康 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (24): 3402-3406.

父母教养方式与青少年反刍思维的相关性分析

张芳芳¹, 高睿², 李小梅¹, 王新凯², 张于巾², 杨海燕²

1.西安交通大学第一附属医院精神心理卫生科,陕西西安 710061;
2.西安交通大学医学部护理系,陕西西安 710061

收稿日期:2023-05-08 修回日期:2023-05-29 出版日期:2023-12-15 发布日期:2026-03-26
通信作者: 高睿,副教授,E-mail：gaorui@xjtu.edu.cn
作者简介:张芳芳,女,护师,主要从事精神心理护理工作。

Correlation analysis between parental rearing patterns and adolescents' rumination

ZHANG Fangfang¹, GAORui², LI Xiaomei¹, WANG Xinkai², ZHANG Yujin², YANG Haiyan²

1. Department of Psychiatry,the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an Shaanxi 710061,China;
2. Department of Nursing,Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center,Xi'an Shaanxi 710061,China

Received:2023-05-08 Revised:2023-05-29 Online:2023-12-15 Published:2026-03-26
Contact: GAO Rui,Associate professor,E-mail：gaorui@xjtu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的了解目前青少年反刍思维水平,分析父母教养方式对青少年反刍思维的影响。方法 2022年3—4月,采取分层抽样的方法选取甘肃省宁县某中学初一至初三、高一至高三302名同学,使用一般资料调查问卷、简式父母教养方式量表、中文版反刍思维量表进行调查。采用多元逐步线性回归分析青少年反刍思维的影响因素,采用Pearson相关分析父母教养方式与青少年反刍思维之间的关系。结果 302名青少年反刍思维总得分为（45.90±11.92）分,症状反刍得分为（23.84±6.96）分,强迫思考得分为（11.86±3.38）分,反复深思得分为（10.20±3.03）分。性别、长期居住地是影响青少年反刍思维的独立影响因素,共解释青少年反刍思维4.00%的变异。父母教养方式中的父母情感温暖维度与青少年的反刍思维总得分、反刍思维各维度得分呈负相关（均P<0.05）,父母拒绝和过度保护维度与青少年反刍思维总得分、反刍思维各维度得分呈正相关（均P<0.05）。结论青少年反刍思维处于中等水平。女生较男生的反刍思维更严重,农村青少年较城镇青少年的反刍思维更严重。在干预的过程中应重点关注女性和农村青少年,提倡父母在养育子女的过程中多采用情感温暖的教养方式。

关键词: 青少年, 父母教养方式, 反刍思维

Abstract: Objective To understand the current level of ruminating thinking in adolescents and analyze the influence of parental rearing patterns on ruminating thinking in adolescents. Methods From March to April 2022,302 middle school students from grades 7 to 9,10 to 12 in a middle school in Ning County,Gansu Province were selected using stratified sampling method. General information questionnaire,simplified parental rearing pattern scale,and Chinese version of ruminating thinking scale were used for investigation.Multiple stepwise linear regression analysis was used to investigate the influencing factors of ruminating thinking in adolescents,and Pearson correlation analysis was used to analyze the relationship between parental rearing patterns and ruminating thinking in adolescents. Results The total score of ruminating thinking in 302 middle school students was （45.90±11.92）points,the score of symptom ruminating was （23.84±6.96）points,the score of obsessive thinking was （11.86±3.38）points,and the score of repetitive thinking was（10.20±3.03）points.Gender and long-term residence were independent factors affecting ruminating thinking in adolescents,accounting for 4.00% of the variance in ruminating thinking in adolescents.The dimension of parental emotional warmth in parental rearing patterns was negatively correlated with the total score of ruminating thinking in adolescents and the scores of each dimension of ruminating thinking（all P<0.05）,while the dimension of parental rejection and overprotection was positively correlated with the total score of ruminating thinking in adolescents and the scores of each dimension of ruminating thinking（all P<0.05）. Conclusion Ruminating thinking in adolescents is at a moderate level.Ruminating thinking in girls is more severe than that in boys,and ruminating thinking in rural adolescents is more severe than that in urban adolescents.In the process of intervention,attention should be paid to girls and rural adolescents,and parents should be encouraged to adopt emotional warmth in parenting.

Key words: Teenagers, Parenting style, Ruminant thinking

中图分类号:

R395.6

张芳芳, 高睿, 李小梅, 王新凯, 张于巾, 杨海燕. 父母教养方式与青少年反刍思维的相关性分析. [J]职业与健康, 2023, 39(24): 3402-3406.

ZHANG Fangfang, GAORui, LI Xiaomei, WANG Xinkai, ZHANG Yujin, YANG Haiyan. Correlation analysis between parental rearing patterns and adolescents' rumination. [J]OCCUPATION AND HEALTH, 2023, 39(24): 3402-3406.

参考文献

[1] NOLEN-H0EKSEMA S,WISCO B E,LYUBOMIRSKY S.Rethinking Rumination[J].Perspect Psychol Sci,2008,3(5):400-424.
[2] 宣之璇. 大学生反刍思维、心理韧性和抑郁、焦虑的关系及干预[D].杭州:浙江大学,2017.
[3] WATKINS E E,BROWN R G.Rumination and executive function in depression:An experimental study[J].J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,2002,72(3):400-402.
[4] DARLING N,STEINBERG L.Parenting Style as Context:An Integrative Model[J].Pol Psychol Bull,1993,113(3):487-496.
[5] NOLEN-HOEKSEMA S.Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes[J].J Abnorm Psychol,1991,100(4):569-582.
[6] GATE M A,WATKINS E R,SIMMONS J G,et al.Maternal Parenting Behaviors and Adolescent Depression:The Mediating Role of Rumination[J].J Clin Child Adolesc,2013,42(3):348-357.
[7] 甘小荣,郝彦斌,胡雯.父母教养方式对大学生反刍思维的影响——完美主义和情绪智力的中介作用分析[J].现代预防医学,2017,44(6):1149-1152.
[8] 程宝珏. 父母教养方式对中学生抑郁的影响[D].徐州:江苏师范大学,2018.
[9] 李峥嵘. 大学生父母教养方式、反刍思维与自杀意念的关系研究[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2019.
[10] 韩秀,杨宏飞.Nolen-Hoeksema反刍思维量表在中国的试用[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2009,17(5):550-551.
[11] 蒋奖,鲁峥嵘,蒋苾菁.简式父母教养方式问卷中文版的初步修订[J].心理发展与教育,2010,26(1):94-99.
[12] 周伊伦. 高中生正念水平、反刍思维与抑郁的关系及教育对策[D].郑州:河南大学,2020.
[13] 陈庆平,赵丽霞,孙明月.高中生反刍思维、惧怕否定评价心理及其对交往焦虑的影响[J].西部素质教育,2015,1(3):82-83.
[14] 沈燕. 高中生反刍思维、自尊、心理韧性与社交焦虑的关系[D].湘潭:湖南科技大学,2020.
[15] 王琛. 负性生活事件对大学新生适应性的影响:反刍思维的中介作用及其干预研究[D].石家庄:河北师范大学,2022.
[16] 侯金柱. 高中生自卑、隐性自恋、友谊质量对孤独感的影响:反刍思维的作用[D].广州:广州大学,2022.
[17] 丁文. 高中生反刍思维、学习自我效能感与学业拖延的关系研究[D].扬州:扬州大学,2022.
[18] NOLEN-HOEKSEMA S,MORROW J.Effects of rumination and distraction on naturally occurring depressed mood[J].Cognition Emotion,1993,7(6):561-570.
[19] 张鹤. 高中生反刍思维、心理韧性和自杀意念的关系及干预研究[D].淮北:淮北师范大学,2020.
[20] 李璐. 人际关系敏感对攻击行为的影响[D].郑州:郑州大学,2020.
[21] 彭惠琼. 青少年网络受欺负与消极情绪、积极情绪的关系[D].长沙:湖南师范大学,2019.
[22] 许可. 父母教养方式对反刍思维的影响:完美主义和自尊的作用[D].赣州:赣南师范大学,2019.
[23] 张国雯,马雪辉,陈淑娟.父母教养方式对高中生反刍思维的影响[J].山西青年,2021(7):153-154.
[24] HILT L M,ARMSTRONG J M,ESSEX M J.Early family context and development of adolescent ruminative style:Moderation by temperament[J].Cognition Emotion,2012,26(5):916-926.