职业与健康 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (22): 3056-3062.

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于全产业链的7家锂离子电池生产企业职业病危害调查

祁羽倩1,2, 汪国海3a, 付强3a, 陆强3a, 朱建全3a, 谈立峰1,2,3b   

  1. 1.南京医科大学公共卫生学院,江苏 南京 211166;
    2.南京医科大学常州公共卫生高等研究院,江苏 常州 213022;
    3.常州市疾病预防控制中心 a 职业与放射疾病科, b 副主任室,江苏 常州 213022
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-27 修回日期:2025-09-02 发布日期:2025-12-15
  • 通信作者: 谈立峰,主任医师,E-mail:cztanlifeng@163.com
  • 作者简介:祁羽倩,女,在读硕士研究生,研究方向为职业与健康。
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省卫健委职业健康科研项目(JSZJ20231202)

Investigation on occupational hazards of 7 lithium-ion battery manufacturers based on the entire industrial chain

QI Yuqian1,2, WANG Guohai3a, FU Qiang3a, LU Qiang3a, ZHU Jianquan3a, TAN Lifeng1,2,3b   

  1. 1. School of Public Health,Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 211166,China;
    2. Changzhou Advanced Institute of Public Health,Nanjing Medical University,Changzhou,Jiangsu 213022,China;
    3. a Department of Occupational and Radiological Disease,b Deputy Director Office,Changzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention,Changzhou,Jiangsu 213022,China
  • Received:2025-04-27 Revised:2025-09-02 Published:2025-12-15
  • Contact: TAN Lifeng,Chief physician,E-mail:cztanlifeng@163.com

摘要: 目的 调查并识别锂离子电池生产全产业链各作业岗位的职业病危害因素,为提出针对性的防控对策提供科学依据。方法 选取常州市覆盖正极材料、负极材料、隔膜、电解液和总装锂离子电池生产全产业链代表性的7家企业为研究对象,分别采用调查表方式进行职业卫生现场调查;收集2022—2024年职业病危害因素检测报告进行职业病危害因素检测结果分析,并进一步按照相关国家职业卫生标准开展职业病危害作业分级和接触等级分级。结果 7家覆盖全产业链锂离子电池生产企业主要涉及正极材料、负极材料、电解液、隔膜及总装5个生产单元18个作业岗位,职业病危害因素包括其他粉尘、石墨粉尘、炭黑粉尘、氧化铝粉尘、聚乙烯粉尘、铝金属粉尘、电焊烟尘及铜尘等8种粉尘,乙酸乙酯、钴及其化合物、锆及其化合物、镍及难溶性镍化合物、氟及其化合物、氟化氢、二氯甲烷以及锰及其化合物等8种毒物,噪声、X射线以及β射线等3种物理因素。在锂离子电池生产全产业链的全部作业岗位中,接触噪声岗位数最多,为94.44%,接触粉尘、毒物及放射性因素岗位数分别为66.67%、61.11%及11.11%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=26.743,P<0.01)。以上作业岗位接触的所有职业病危害因素的检测结果合格率均为100.00%,所有岗位的作业分级均为0级。在接触粉尘岗位的接触等级中Ⅱ级最多、占78.13%,Ⅰ级、0级、Ⅲ级和Ⅳ级分别占9.38%、6.25%、6.25%及0,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);其中,总装涂布烘干岗位的石墨粉尘(总尘)以及正极材料生产称量投料岗位的铝金属粉尘的接触等级为Ⅲ级。在接触毒物岗位的接触等级中0级最多,占87.88%,Ⅱ级、Ⅰ级、Ⅲ级和Ⅳ级分别占6.06%、3.03%、3.03%及0,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);其中,正极材料生产除磁包装岗位的钴及其化合物的接触等级为Ⅲ级。结论 应重点关注总装涂布烘干岗位的石墨粉尘、正极材料生产称量投料岗位的铝金属粉尘,正极材料生产包装岗位的钴及其化合物,正极材料生产粉碎和称量投料、总装压片制片和注液等作业岗位的噪声等职业病危害因素;总装一次注液、二次注液岗位的氟化氢可能导致的化学性皮肤(眼)灼伤;以及隔膜生产测厚和总装正负极涂布烘干岗位的β射线引起的放射性危害。

关键词: 锂离子电池生产, 全产业链, 职业病危害因素

Abstract: Objective To investigate and identify the occupational hazard factors across all the operational positions in the lithium-ion battery production industrial chain for providing scientific basis for putting forward targeted prevention and control countermeasures. Methods Seven representative manufacturers in Changzhou,covering the entire lithium-ion battery industrial chain(including cathode materials,anode materials,separators,electrolytes,and battery assembly),were selected as the research subjects. The field investigation of occupational health was carried out by means of questionnaire. The results of occupational hazard factors test were analyzed by collecting the test reports of occupational hazard factors from 2022 to 2024,and were further carried out the occupational hazard classification as well as the contact grade classification in accordance with the relevant national occupational health standards. Results The occupational hazard factors were identified in the 7 lithium-ion battery manufacturers covering the entire industrial chain,involving 5 production units(cathode material,anode material,electrolyte,separator,and assembly) across 18 operational positions,including 8 types of dust such as other dust,graphite dust,carbon black dust,alumina dust,polyethylene dust,aluminum metal dust,welding fume and copper dust,8 types of toxic substances like ethyl acetate,cobalt and its compounds,zirconium and its compounds,nickel and insoluble nickel compounds,fluorine and its compounds,hydrogen fluoride,dichloromethane as well as manganese and its compounds,and 3 types of physical hazards including noise,X-rays,and beta rays. Among all the jobs positions in the entire industry chain of lithium-ion battery production,the number of positions exposed to noise was the largest(94.44%),and the number of positions exposed to dust,poison and radioactive factors were 66.67%,61.11% and 11.11%,respectively,and the difference was statistically significant(χ2=26.743,P<0.01). The compliance rate of all occupational hazard factors encountered in the above job positions was 100.00%,with all positions classified as level 0. Among the contact grades of dust exposure positions,the Ⅱ level was the most,accounting for 78.13%,and theⅠ,0,Ⅲ and Ⅳ levels accounted for 9.38%,6.25%,6.25% and 0,respectively,with no statistically significant difference(P>0.05).Among them,graphite dust(total dust) in the coating and drying position of the final assembly,aluminum metal dust in the weighing and feeding position of cathode material production were rated as contact level III. Moreover,among the exposure levels of toxic posts,the highest level was 0,accounting for 87.88%,while the levels Ⅱ,Ⅰ,Ⅲ and Ⅳaccounted for 6.06%,3.03%,3.03% and 0,respectively,with no statistically significant difference(P>0.05). Among them,cobalt and its compounds at the demagnetizing packaging position in cathode material production was rated as contact level III. Conclusion Attention should be paid to occupational hazard factors such as graphite dust in the coating and drying position of the final assembly,aluminum metal dust in the weighing and feeding position of positive material production,cobalt and its compounds in the packaging position of positive material production,and noise in the crushing and weighing and feeding positions of positive material production,final assembly sheet making and liquid injection,chemical skin(eye) burns that may be caused by hydrogen fluoride in primary and secondary injection positions,and the radioactive hazards caused by beta rays in the thickness measuring positions of diaphragm production as well as in the positive and negative electrode coating drying positions of battery assembly.

Key words: Lithium-ion battery production, Entire industrial chain, Occupational hazard factors

中图分类号: